Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 30, 1993 (verified)·Caller's story·2 min·at 2:36:46 in the broadcast

A small terrier greets family members outside a house after an uncle's death

An unnamed caller tells Art Bell that about three years earlier, after the caller's uncle died at around 2 a.m., a small dog was outside the aunt's house when the family returned in the morning. The caller says the dog greeted each immediate family member and waited to be petted. It left after the whole family had arrived and was never seen again.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.78
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 1:34
Play
0:03 · The caller says their uncle died about three years earlier at around 2 o'clock in the morning.0:10 · The family went to the hospital to condole the aunt.0:17 · The family went home for a few hours and returned to the aunt's house in the morning.0:30 · The caller reports a dog outside the front of the house.0:34 · The dog reportedly came up to each immediate family member who got out of the car.0:43 · The dog reportedly sat until petted and then walked away.0:47 · After the whole immediate family arrived, the dog reportedly went away and was never seen again.1:01 · The caller says the dog looked like a little terrier.1:09 · The caller says the dog was full of life, like the uncle, and that the episode was strange.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1993.mp3”, starting at 2:36:46). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller says they have a story about their uncle, who died about three years earlier at around 2 o'clock in the morning. According to the caller, the family went to the hospital to condole the aunt. They then went home for a few hours because it was getting early, and came back to the aunt's house in the morning. The caller reports that there was a small dog parked outside the front of the house. Each time a member of the immediate family got out of the car, the caller says, the dog came up to them and sat there until they petted it, then walked away. The caller says that once the whole immediate family had arrived at the house, the dog went away and they never saw it again. Art asks whether the caller has any idea whose dog it was or why it did what it did. The caller says it looked like a little terrier and that they do not know. The caller describes it as a little tiny dog that was full of life, and says the uncle was the same way, a guy who was just so full of life. The caller calls the episode strange, repeating that the dog waited to greet everyone who came to the house and then was gone after everyone got there. Art responds that it is a really weird story, and the call ends.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:03

    The caller says their uncle died about three years earlier at around 2 o'clock in the morning.

  2. 0:10

    The family went to the hospital to condole the aunt.

  3. 0:17

    The family went home for a few hours and returned to the aunt's house in the morning.

  4. 0:30

    The caller reports a dog outside the front of the house.

  5. 0:34

    The dog reportedly came up to each immediate family member who got out of the car.

  6. 0:43

    The dog reportedly sat until petted and then walked away.

  7. 0:47

    After the whole immediate family arrived, the dog reportedly went away and was never seen again.

  8. 1:01

    The caller says the dog looked like a little terrier.

  9. 1:09

    The caller says the dog was full of life, like the uncle, and that the episode was strange.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:30

    A dog was outside the front of the aunt's house when the family returned in the morning.

  • observation· 0:34

    The dog approached each immediate family member who got out of the car.

  • observation· 0:43

    The dog waited until petted and then walked away.

  • observation· 0:47

    After the whole immediate family arrived, the dog went away and was never seen again.

  • observation· 1:01

    The dog looked like a little terrier.

  • interpretation· 1:09

    The caller compares the dog's being full of life to the uncle, but does not say what caused it.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
52

This is a brief but consistent firsthand story with a clear sequence and a family connection. But it gives no names, places, or details that can be checked, and a stray-dog explanation fits easily. The caller is fairly careful, saying they do not know what it was while noting a resemblance to the uncle.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand framing: the caller refers to “my uncle” and “we all.”
  • A clear sequence: death, hospital, return home, return to the aunt's house, the dog greeting each person, the dog leaving.
  • A specific detail about the dog's behavior: it waited to be petted before walking away.
Against
  • No names, town, street, date, or other details that could be checked are given.
  • A stray or neighborhood dog approaching arriving people is an ordinary possibility the caller does not address.
  • The story is brief and relies on the caller's memory about three years later.
Uncertain or missing
  • The labels showing who is speaking are inconsistent in the automatic transcript, though the story is clear.
  • The exact number of family witnesses is not stated.
Passages cited
  • 0:03
  • 0:34
  • 1:09

What the model inferred (not said on air): The story holds together and is firsthand, but its credibility as testimony is limited by vagueness and by how easily a stray dog explains it.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
8

The support is the caller's word plus a claimed group of family witnesses, none of whom speaks on air. No documents, names, locations, or physical evidence are provided.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller gives a firsthand report.
  • The caller claims several immediate family members were there.
Against
  • No second witness speaks on air.
  • No names, places, dates, or records are supplied.
  • No photograph, recording, or physical trace is claimed.
Uncertain or missing
  • The number of witnesses and their relationship to the caller are not given beyond “immediate family.”
Passages cited
  • 0:47
  • 1:24

What the model inferred (not said on air): This falls in the lowest evidence range: a caller's word with claimed but unheard witnesses.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
25

The story is mostly gentle and even comforting in tone: a small dog greets mourners after a death. The unsettling part is the dog's disappearance after the family has gathered, which gives the story a mildly eerie ending without threat or harm.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The dog is said to wait for each family member and then vanish after the whole family arrives.
  • The timing right after a death gives the episode an in-between, uncanny feel.
Against
  • No threat, attack, ill will, or frightening image is reported.
  • The dog is described as small, lively, and friendly.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller does not say outright that the dog was the uncle or something beyond nature.
Passages cited
  • 0:47
  • 1:09

What the model inferred (not said on air): The mild creepiness comes from the uncanny timing and disappearance, not from any reported menace.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
49

An animal appearing around a death is a familiar ghost-story pattern. But the specific detail of a small dog greeting each immediate family member in turn and leaving only after the whole family has arrived gives the story a distinctive shape.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The strange event involves an animal rather than a human ghost.
  • The dog reportedly waits for each family member to pet it before walking away.
  • The dog leaves after the family has gathered and is never seen again.
Against
  • The [quote withheld] idea is a recognizable folk motif.
  • The story is short and lacks other unusual details.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller does not say outright that the dog was the uncle, so the link to the death stays implied.
Passages cited
  • 0:34
  • 0:47

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score reflects a familiar pattern with a distinctive greeting-and-departure detail.

Scoring confidence 0.76 · analysis confidence 0.80 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand account.; Several family witnesses claimed, none speaking on air.; No documents or physical evidence.. The originality score blends the model's score (62) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A stray or neighborhood dog happened to be outside the house and moved between the arriving people. · The caller describes a small dog outside the front of the house and says it approached family members. No owner or earlier sighting is given.
  • The dog left when the arrivals ended because there was no more activity or attention. · The caller says the dog went away after the whole immediate family had arrived, which could match the end of people getting out of cars and petting it.

What stands out

The reported strange event involves an animal rather than a human figure. A small dog is said to greet each immediate family member in turn and then disappear after the family has gathered. The caller offers only a comparison to the dead uncle, not a clear identification.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.