Transparent child figure at the bedside during inner-child therapy
A caller who gives their name as [name withheld], calling from Genoa, Nevada, describes an experience about two years earlier. They were in recovery and in counseling with a girlfriend, and the couple were doing “inner child” therapy. They say that one night, lying in bed with their eyes open, they saw a transparent little girl of about eight, a smaller version of their girlfriend. She spoke without moving her lips, said she had come to play with them, then ran off with another child in a field. They report that the episode lasted roughly ten minutes, that they were not afraid, and that they invited her to return. The host ended the call.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1993.mp3”, starting at 1:04:19). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The caller, who gives their name as [name withheld] and says they are calling from Genoa, Nevada, describes something they say happened about two years before the broadcast. The caller says they were a recovering alcoholic and were dating a woman who had recently entered recovery. They were in counseling together and [quote withheld] and their therapist told them they got along because they played well together. They say the relationship went sour, that she began dating another man, and that the two of them planned to move to Cleveland, Ohio. One night, they say, they were lying in their bed with their eyes open when a little girl of about eight years old came up and stood next to their bed. She had a pixie haircut, shorts, and a small halter top. They describe her as a smaller version of their girlfriend. According to the caller, she spoke without opening her lips and said [quote withheld] (their name and, they say, their inner child). She said she was leaving and wanted to come and play first. The caller says she ran off with another small child they assumed was themself. The walls of their room were no longer visible, only the two of them running in a field. They say they kept asking out loud whether the other person could feel or see it, and they guess the episode lasted about ten minutes. They say she then returned, thanked them, said she was leaving, and hoped to come back. She was transparent but still present, and they told her she could come back any time. They say they were not afraid because it was someone they knew. The host thanked the caller and ended the call.
Reported events, in order
- 0:23
The caller, from Genoa, Nevada, says they are a recovering alcoholic and were dating a woman who had recently entered recovery. This was about two years before the broadcast.
- 0:34
They say they were in counseling and doing [quote withheld] and that their therapist said they got along because they played well together.
- 0:49
They say the relationship went sour, the woman began dating another man, and they planned to move to Cleveland, Ohio.
- 1:00
They describe lying in their bed at night and explain the therapy instruction to close the eyes and imagine the inner child.
- 1:10
They say that with their eyes open a little girl of about eight, with a pixie haircut, shorts, and a halter top, came and stood next to their bed.
- 1:32
They describe her as a smaller version of their girlfriend.
- 1:39
They say the girl, without opening her lips, said she had come to play with “[name withheld]” (their name and their inner child) and that she was leaving or moving.
- 2:00
They say she ran off with another small child they assume to be themself. The walls of the room vanished, and they saw the two running in a field.
- 2:29
They say they kept asking out loud whether the other person could feel or see the same thing.
- 2:35
They estimate the episode lasted about ten minutes, and say this is a guess.
- 2:40
They say the girl walked back, thanked them, said she was leaving, and hoped to come back to see them again.
- 2:50
They say she was transparent but still standing there, and they told her she could come back any time.
- 3:03
They say the experience was not a fear thing and that they were not afraid. Asked why, they say it was because it was somebody they knew, a shy eight- or nine-year-old.
- 3:19
The host comments that he would like to think he could react the same way, thanks the caller, and ends the call.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 1:10
The caller says that while lying in bed at night with their eyes open, a little girl about eight years old appeared and stood right next to their bed.
- observation· 1:19
The caller describes her appearance: pixie haircut, shorts, and a small halter top.
- interpretation· 1:32
The caller says the child looked like a smaller version of their girlfriend.
- observation· 1:39
The caller says the girl spoke without opening her lips, saying she had come to play with “[name withheld].”
- observation· 2:10
The caller says the walls of their room were no longer visible and they saw the two children running in a field.
- observation· 2:35
The caller estimates the episode lasted about ten minutes.
- observation· 2:50
The caller says the girl was transparent yet still standing right there.
- observation· 3:03
The caller says the experience was not frightening to them.
- interpretation· 2:24
The caller says they wondered whether there was a connection between the child and themself.
- hearsay· 0:38
The caller reports that their therapist said the caller and their girlfriend got along so well because they played so well together.
- host statement· 3:19
The host says he would like to think he could react as the caller did.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a clear, coherent first-person story with an identifiable setting and sequence. But it is not backed up by anyone else, and an ordinary explanation fits (bedtime imagery plus a therapy exercise built around imagining a child) that the caller never discusses.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand account by the person who reports the experience.
- Concrete setting and sequence: bed, eyes open, figure at the bedside, dialogue, ten-minute estimate.
- The call is calm, and the caller separates what they saw from what they assumed, as in [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
- An ordinary explanation fits easily (lying in bed at night, a therapy exercise built on imagining a child figure, a recent painful breakup), and the caller does not address that possibility.
- No second witness is said to have confirmed seeing or feeling anything. Their questions to the absent woman go unanswered in the transcript.
- Some lines are garbled (the name “Gary” appears in a confused sentence).
- The labels showing who is speaking alternate between the host and the caller within single sentences, so which person said a line is only approximate.
- 0:23
- 1:00
- 1:19
What the model inferred (not said on air): The split among the components, and the placement between the scoring guide’s anchors of 40 ([quote withheld]) and 55 ([quote withheld]), is my judgment. The caller says nothing about the ordinary possibility either way.
Only the caller’s word exists. A few details that could be checked (place, approximate date) are given, but nothing has been examined or verified.
Evidence for and against
- The caller gives a stated location (Genoa, Nevada, near Carson City) and a rough timeframe (about two years earlier), which could in principle be checked.
- No documentation, recording, photograph, or physical trace is claimed (none appears anywhere in this part of the broadcast).
- No second witness speaks on air. The person the caller addresses cannot be heard.
- No outside check was done. A cap of 50 applies but is not approached.
- 0:09
- 0:23
What the model inferred (not said on air): Placing this at the low end of the 11 to 25 range reflects that the details are given only as background and no independent support is claimed.
A ghost at the bedside at night is mildly eerie to a listener. But the story is framed as harmless, without threat, escalation, or harm, and the caller explicitly denies fear.
Evidence for and against
- A transparent figure appears unannounced at a bedside at night.
- The room apparently dissolves into a field, an intrusion into ordinary surroundings.
- The caller says it was not frightening: [quote withheld]
- They describe the figure as shy and child-sized, and they invite her to come back.
- The reported duration of about ten minutes is the caller’s own estimate ([quote withheld]), so the sense of a lasting presence rests on an approximate figure.
- 3:30
- 2:50
What the model inferred (not said on air): The creepiness rating is an editorial response to the content, not a claim about what occurred. The harmless framing lowers it well below the anchor of 50.
A stock bedside-figure pattern is combined with an unusual premise: a child-sized version of a living partner, met during inner-child therapy. That is not a standard haunting motif.
Evidence for and against
- The distinctive element is that the figure is described as a younger version of a living girlfriend, arising out of an “inner child” therapy exercise.
- She speaks without moving her lips, names the caller’s inner child, and the scene changes to a field where the children play.
- The pattern is familiar: a figure appears beside a bed at night and then disappears.
- A child ghost and a fading room are recurring ghost-story devices.
- The originality value published by the site is compared with the rest of the archive and is provisional for this pilot. The value here is the model’s estimate from the content.
- 0:34
- 1:32
What the model inferred (not said on air): The provisional model score reflects content only. How new this story is compared with the rest of the archive cannot be worked out from a single story in this pilot.
Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.68 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand spoken account only.; No photographs, recordings, or documents claimed or examined.; No second witness speaks on air. The caller addresses questions to an absent person.. The originality score blends the model's score (58) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- Vivid images while falling asleep or waking up: a strong visual experience in bed at night, which can include dreamlike scenery (the walls disappearing and a field appearing). · The caller says they were lying in bed at night when the figure appeared: [quote withheld]
- Suggestion from the therapy exercise: practiced inner-child visualization could plausibly shape the images (a child version of the girlfriend). · The caller says the couple were doing inner-child therapy in which [quote withheld]
- Emotional preoccupation with the breakup could plausibly supply the theme (the girlfriend leaving, wanting to play one last time). · The caller says the relationship “went sour” and the girlfriend was about to move away with another man.
What stands out
The report pairs a ghost at the bedside with an ongoing therapy exercise in which the caller was told to picture a child. The figure is a younger version of a living girlfriend, not a dead person. The caller also describes the bedroom walls dissolving into a field where the children play.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.