Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·2 min·at 2:24:36 in the broadcast

Caller's employee dreams of three dead relatives; a grandmother dies two days later

A caller named [name withheld], in Phoenix, tells of an employee who came to work about a week earlier and described a dream. In it, the employee filmed from a front yard as three recently deceased people walked through a gate: their own mother, their girlfriend's grandfather, and their girlfriend's grandmother. The employee reportedly did not recognize the last woman, but their girlfriend identified her as her grandmother. Two days later, the caller says, the employee arrived late because that grandmother had died.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.88
How it was toldSecondhand · Live call
0:00 / 2:19
Play
0:07 · An employee of the caller comes to work and says they must describe a dream. The caller notes that the employee [quote withheld]0:24 · In the dream, the employee stands in the front yard of a house, filming with an old video camera from their mother. Nearby is a white picket fence with an open gate.0:48 · In the dream, the employee's mother walks through the gate. The caller says she had died the previous February.1:05 · The girlfriend's grandfather follows. The caller says he had also died that past year.1:21 · The girlfriend's grandmother follows behind.1:27 · The employee reportedly does not recognize the last woman and describes her to their girlfriend.1:32 · The girlfriend identifies her as her grandmother, in a pink dress with a bow. It is the dress the grandmother wants to be buried in.2:05 · Two days later, on Wednesday, the employee arrives late. The employee says the girlfriend's grandmother has just died.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 2:24:36). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

[name withheld], a caller in Phoenix, says that [quote withheld] one of the caller's employees, who [quote withheld] came to work and insisted on describing a dream. According to the caller, the employee dreamed they were standing in the front yard of a house, filming with an old video camera their mother had given them. There was a white picket fence and an open gate. In the dream the employee's mother walked through the gate. The caller says she had died the previous February. Next came their girlfriend's grandfather, who the caller says had also died that past year, and then their girlfriend's grandmother. The employee reportedly said they did not know who the last woman was, because they had never seen her. The employee described her to their girlfriend, who said it was her grandmother, wearing [quote withheld] and that this was the dress she wanted to be buried in. The caller then says that two days later, on Wednesday, the employee came to work late and explained that their girlfriend's grandmother had just died. A voice on the line calls the sequence “really weird,” and the host remarks that he hadn't been sure where the video fit in. The story ends there. The host thanks the caller and takes the next call.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:07

    An employee of the caller comes to work and says they must describe a dream. The caller notes that the employee [quote withheld]

  2. 0:24

    In the dream, the employee stands in the front yard of a house, filming with an old video camera from their mother. Nearby is a white picket fence with an open gate.

  3. 0:48

    In the dream, the employee's mother walks through the gate. The caller says she had died the previous February.

  4. 1:05

    The girlfriend's grandfather follows. The caller says he had also died that past year.

  5. 1:21

    The girlfriend's grandmother follows behind.

  6. 1:27

    The employee reportedly does not recognize the last woman and describes her to their girlfriend.

  7. 1:32

    The girlfriend identifies her as her grandmother, in a pink dress with a bow. It is the dress the grandmother wants to be buried in.

  8. 2:05

    Two days later, on Wednesday, the employee arrives late. The employee says the girlfriend's grandmother has just died.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 0:07

    The caller says an employee of theirs, who [quote withheld] came to work a week ago Monday (counting back from the broadcast) and insisted on telling them a dream.

  • hearsay· 0:24

    The employee reportedly dreamed they were standing in the front yard of a house, filming with an old video camera their mother had given them. There was a white picket fence and an open gate.

  • hearsay· 0:55

    In the dream, the employee's mother came walking through the gate. The caller says the mother had died the previous February.

  • hearsay· 1:21

    After her, the grandfather of the employee's girlfriend appeared in the dream, and then the girlfriend's grandmother. The caller says the grandfather had also died that past year.

  • hearsay· 1:27

    The employee reportedly said they did not know who the last woman was because they had never seen her. They described her to their girlfriend.

  • hearsay· 1:32

    The girlfriend said the woman the employee described was her grandmother, [quote withheld] and that this was the dress she wanted to be buried in.

  • hearsay· 2:05

    Two days later, on Wednesday, the employee arrived late and said their girlfriend's grandmother had just died.

  • observation· 2:10

    A voice on the line calls the sequence “really weird.” The label showing who is speaking names the caller, but who said it is uncertain.

  • host statement· 1:23

    The host calls the dream procession [quote withheld]

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
52

Scored as a typical short secondhand story with an easy ordinary explanation: coincidence plus identification after the fact. It is coherent and fairly specific. But the source is a claimed employee, and the second witness, the girlfriend, does not speak.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Concrete sequence: the dream on Monday, the death two days later on Wednesday.
  • Distinctive reported details: a white picket fence, an open gate, an old video camera given by their mother, and a pink dress with a bow.
  • A reported match within the story: the girlfriend identified a woman the employee had never seen, and a detail about her dress matched.
Against
  • Secondhand throughout. The dreamer is an unnamed employee and never speaks.
  • No names or addresses, and no dates beyond [quote withheld] “Wednesday,” and “this past February.”
  • A dream about elderly relatives followed two days later by the death of an elderly relative is easily explained by coincidence (an inference).
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller's relationship to the employee and how fully they pass on the dream are unknown.
  • The story does not say whether the grandmother was elderly, ill, or remote at the time of the dream. This affects whether coincidence explains it.
Passages cited
  • 0:07
  • 1:32

What the model inferred (not said on air): How close the source is (close but unnamed) and the penalty for other explanations are my judgments. The transcript supplies the sequence and details but no names or checks.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
12

At root this is the caller's claim, passed on secondhand, with one claimed witness who does not speak. That places it in the range of 11 to 25 on the scoring guide, but near the bottom.

Evidence for and against
For
  • One claimed detail backed up by someone else: the girlfriend identified the woman the employee had never seen, including a description of her dress.
  • Relative timing is given: the dream came [quote withheld] and the death on “Wednesday.”
Against
  • Nothing checkable is given: no names, no place of death, and no dates beyond relative ones.
  • No photograph or recording of the dream or of the grandmother.
  • The second witness, the girlfriend, does not speak on air.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the caller could name the employee or the girlfriend is not explored on air.
Passages cited
  • 1:27

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score range follows the scoring guide's “other witnesses claimed” description. No outside check was made or possible from this transcript.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
35

Mildly eerie rather than frightening. There is death-omen imagery but no menace or intrusion into a bedroom, and the story ends with the host thanking the caller.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A reported procession of the recently dead through a gate, which the host calls [quote withheld]
  • The dream describes a person who then dies two days later.
  • It leaves open how the dreamer could know the appearance of a woman they had never seen.
Against
  • No threat, harm, or physical contact is reported.
  • The dream images are described calmly: a yard, a gate, a dress.
Uncertain or missing
  • Only the caller's own reaction, [quote withheld] is on the record.
Passages cited
  • 1:23

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is my read of the imagery's effect on a listener. Nothing in the transcript describes fear.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
57

A familiar story of a death foreseen in a dream, with a couple of distinctive details: the camera, and the unknown woman identified by her burial dress.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The dream is framed as being filmed with an old video camera the employee's mother gave them, an odd and specific detail.
  • A three-person procession through a front-yard gate, with the last figure unknown to the dreamer.
  • The identifying detail is a pink dress with a bow that the grandmother reportedly wanted to be buried in.
Against
  • Dreams that foretell a death are a common ghost-story frame.
  • A recently deceased relative appearing in a dream is a stock element.
Uncertain or missing
  • Tagging the story's themes depends on an automatic transcript in which the labels showing who is speaking switch back and forth.
Passages cited
  • 1:32

What the model inferred (not said on air): A provisional score until the story can be compared with the rest of the archive. With few stories archived so far, that comparison carries little weight.

Scoring confidence 0.50 · analysis confidence 0.62 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's secondhand story, passing on what an unnamed employee told the caller; Claimed identification by the girlfriend, who does not speak on air; No photograph, recording, document, name, address, or record presented or examined. The originality score blends the model's score (52) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Someone prone to vivid dreams had a dream with death imagery, and then an elderly relative already known to the family died. This could be coincidence rather than foreknowledge. It is offered only as a possibility. The transcript gives no information about the grandmother's health or circumstances. · The caller says the employee [quote withheld] so vivid or death-related dreams were reportedly not new for them.
  • Matching after the fact: someone who already knows her grandmother's appearance and favorite dress may recognize a loose description. The transcript does not say how detailed the description was, so this is only a possibility about how the woman was identified. · Only the girlfriend identified the unknown woman, and she was present when the description was given.
  • Recent deaths in the family may shape what someone dreams and make a later death seem more significant. The caller does not offer this reading, and the transcript does not establish it. · Two family deaths had reportedly occurred within the previous year: the mother in February and the grandfather “this past year.”

What stands out

What sets this story apart is the way the dream is framed: the employee reportedly filmed the procession with an old video camera their dead mother had given them. The third figure was also reportedly unknown to the dreamer and identified afterward by the girlfriend. The story is entirely secondhand, from an employer passing on what their worker told them.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.