Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·2 min·at 48:46 in the broadcast

Chains, a plea for peace, and grave markers in a Logan County field

A caller who gives their name as [name withheld] and their location as “Portland, KX” relays a story they say their grandfather told them about land the family bought in Logan County, West Virginia. They say plowing turned up what looked like makeshift grave markers. One night a family member was woken by rattling chains and a plea to be left in peace in death. The caller says the family stopped plowing the land and left it alone. The host closes the call with his own thoughts on spirits and buried bodies.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 2:20
Play
0:16 · The caller says they are originally from West Virginia and that the story came from their grandfather. They stress that it was told to them.0:30 · They say the family bought a plantation in Logan County, West Virginia, with a big field.0:46 · Their great-grandfather tried to plow the land and found the ground “real rocky.”0:53 · When the family later looked, the stones turned out to be what the caller calls makeshift little grave markers.1:02 · They say their grandfather told them that someone was woken one night by chains rattling and “screens” (possibly screams).1:05 · Words that sound like a plea: [quote withheld]1:17 · Someone suggested it was a dream. The reply was that all the grandchildren heard it too.1:28 · The caller says the story left them [quote withheld]1:35 · Asked whether they kept plowing, the caller says the family stopped plowing the land and left it alone.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 48:46). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller says they are [quote withheld] and that they are repeating a story their grandfather told them. They make clear it is secondhand: [quote withheld] They say the family [quote withheld] which had a big field. Their great-grandfather tried to plow the land. The ground was “real rocky,” and when the family later looked, they saw what the caller describes as “makeshift” [quote withheld] [name withheld] then says their grandfather told them that [quote withheld] [name withheld] says a voice asked, [quote withheld] They report that someone suggested a dream: [quote withheld] The answer was [quote withheld] [name withheld] says the story left them [quote withheld] Art asked whether the family kept plowing. [name withheld] answers that they [quote withheld] and “left it alone.” Art then wonders why spirits would stay attached to their former bodies, adding [quote withheld]

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:16

    The caller says they are originally from West Virginia and that the story came from their grandfather. They stress that it was told to them.

  2. 0:30

    They say the family bought a plantation in Logan County, West Virginia, with a big field.

  3. 0:46

    Their great-grandfather tried to plow the land and found the ground “real rocky.”

  4. 0:53

    When the family later looked, the stones turned out to be what the caller calls makeshift little grave markers.

  5. 1:02

    They say their grandfather told them that someone was woken one night by chains rattling and “screens” (possibly screams).

  6. 1:05

    Words that sound like a plea: [quote withheld]

  7. 1:17

    Someone suggested it was a dream. The reply was that all the grandchildren heard it too.

  8. 1:28

    The caller says the story left them [quote withheld]

  9. 1:35

    Asked whether they kept plowing, the caller says the family stopped plowing the land and left it alone.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 0:53

    Plowing the purchased land turned up what the caller describes as makeshift grave markers.

  • hearsay· 1:05

    A family member was woken one night by chains rattling and other noises.

  • hearsay· 1:05

    Words were heard asking to be allowed peace in death.

  • hearsay· 1:21

    The grandchildren are said to have heard the same thing, offered as an answer to the dream explanation.

  • host statement· 1:43

    The host muses that spirits may remain attached to or concerned with their former bodies.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
50

This is a generational family story from a close source, with a named county and a few concrete images. It has no dates, names, or records. It is muddled about who was woken. The ordinary dream explanation is one the story itself addresses.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A place is named: [quote withheld]
  • Concrete images: [quote withheld] and “makeshift” “grave markers.”
  • The caller answers the host's follow-up about the land being left unplowed.
Against
  • Secondhand and passed down through generations: [quote withheld]
  • No date, no names, no records, and no second witness on air.
  • Muddled detail: [quote withheld] blurs which relative had the experience.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether “grandfather” and “great-grandfather” refer to the same person in the telling.
  • Whether “screens” is a mistranscription of “screams.”
Passages cited
  • 0:16
  • 0:53
  • 1:17

What the model inferred (not said on air): My component judgments: source closeness scored low because the caller was not present and the story has passed through at least two retellings. Alternative explanations scored in the middle because a dream fits the waking event well, though the story itself answers it with the grandchildren.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

There is only the caller's word, a place name that could be checked, and claimed but absent witnesses. Nothing physical was produced or examined, and no outside check was done.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A specific place is named that could in principle be checked: [quote withheld]
  • Several witnesses are claimed: [quote withheld]
Against
  • No document, photograph, recording, or physical trace is claimed to exist.
  • No second witness speaks on air. The call ends after the host's thanks.
  • No outside check was done, so the evidence score is capped at 50.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller does not say whether any of the grandchildren or the grandfather are still living or could speak.
Passages cited
  • 0:56
  • 1:21

What the model inferred (not said on air): Claimed witnesses count as a claim, not as backing from someone else, under the scoring guide. The place name alone does not raise the score beyond the 11 to 25 range.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
45

A night waking, rattling chains, and a quoted plea for peace in death, in a field that turned out to hold graves, is unsettling. But there is no threat, harm, physical contact, or escalation, and the story is told from a generation away.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Waking at night to rattling chains.
  • A plea rendered as [quote withheld]
  • Graves implied under a field the family then abandoned.
Against
  • A short story, about two minutes including the host's talk.
  • No figure is described as seen, and no one is touched or harmed.
  • The host's closing remarks are thoughtful rather than ominous.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller does not say whether the words were spoken aloud or heard some other way.
Passages cited
  • 1:05
  • 1:35

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is my judgment of the story's effect on a listener, not a claim about whether anything happened.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
54

The pattern, in which disturbing graves brings disturbances at night, is a familiar one. But the quoted plea for peace in death and the detail of plowing up small grave markers give it an edge.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A familiar disturbed-grave, haunted-land pattern.
  • A distinctive element: the dead speak directly, [quote withheld]
Against
  • Rattling chains and night wakings are stock ghost-story elements.
  • The story ends with the familiar [quote withheld] motif.
Uncertain or missing
  • The originality score is provisional for this pilot, and the comparison with the rest of the archive carries little weight.
Passages cited
  • 1:05
  • 0:56

What the model inferred (not said on air): My provisional score reflects a familiar pattern plus one distinctive quoted detail. Comparison with the rest of the archive carries little weight here because few similar stories are available.

Scoring confidence 0.50 · analysis confidence 0.60 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's own telling of a story they attribute to their grandfather; No documents, photographs, recordings, or physical traces claimed; No second witness speaks on air. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A dream, or a waking dream, in the person who was woken. · The caller passes on the explanation given at the time: [quote withheld] The reply that the grandchildren also heard it is offered as the counterargument.
  • Noises from animals, wind, or farm objects in the night, on a property where plowing had just disturbed old ground. · The sounds are described only as [quote withheld] at night on a working farm. The caller gives no source or location for the sound.
  • An unmarked burial ground really was in the field, and the story grew over generations of retelling. · The caller presents it as family history: [quote withheld] The only physical observation reported is stones later read as “makeshift” grave markers.

What stands out

The story pairs disturbed unmarked graves with a spoken plea for peace in death, quoted rather than merely described. The dream explanation is raised and answered inside the story itself, rather than being supplied by the host or left alone.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.