Letter about footsteps and knocking after a grandmother's funeral
A letter read on air by Art Bell, attributed to [name withheld] in Wasilla, Alaska, describes sounds of knocking and slippers in the family home two nights after the writer's grandmother's funeral in January 1972. The writer and their brother hear the sounds on two nights in a row. The letter says both of them still remember it clearly.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 2:46:24). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The host reads a letter from [name withheld] in Wasilla, Alaska. The letter says the writer's grandmother had lived with the family for over ten years and was 84 and mentally lucid. In January 1972 she died several months after a massive stroke. In her last days, she lost her clear mind and cried out that she was dead, sobbing. Two nights after her funeral, the writer and their brother were awake in their beds, talking as usual before sleep. From the grandmother's now-vacant room came a knocking noise and the familiar creak of her closet door. They listened. A minute later, the sound of the grandmother's slippers shuffling on the tiled floor grew louder and came up to the threshold of their open door from the hallway. They were speechless. The next night, shortly after the writer fell asleep, their brother called the writer's name and asked if the writer heard that. Again the foot shuffle came from the living room and hallway outside their room. The letter says that was the last time, but both of them still remember it clearly, and the experience made them less skeptical of ghostly tales.
Reported events, in order
- 0:04
The grandmother had lived with the family over ten years, was 84, and was mentally lucid.
- 0:12
In January 1972, she died several months after a massive stroke.
- 0:18
In her last days, she lost her clear mind and cried out that she was dead, sobbing.
- 0:29
Two nights after the funeral, the writer and their brother sat awake in their beds talking.
- 0:40
From the grandmother's vacant room came a knocking noise and the creak of her closet door.
- 0:49
They listened for the slightest sound.
- 0:53
A minute later, the sound of the grandmother's slippers shuffling on tile came up to the threshold from the hallway.
- 1:06
They were completely speechless.
- 1:14
The next night, after the writer fell asleep, their brother called the writer's name and asked if the writer heard that.
- 1:18
Again the foot shuffle came from the living room and hallway outside their room.
- 1:28
That was the last time. Both brothers still remember it clearly, and it made them less skeptical of ghostly tales.
- 1:42
The host identifies the letter as from [name withheld] in Wasilla, Alaska.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 0:40
A knocking noise came from the grandmother's vacant room.
- observation· 0:44
The closet door in the grandmother's room creaked.
- observation· 0:53
The sound of slippers shuffling on tile grew louder and came closer.
- observation· 1:18
On the next night, the foot shuffle was heard again from the living room and hallway.
- interpretation· 1:28
The writer classifies the events as supernatural.
- interpretation· 1:35
The writer says the experience made the writer and their brother less skeptical of ghost stories.
- host statement· 1:42
The host attributes the letter to [name withheld] in Wasilla, Alaska.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
A firsthand written story with specific dates and a clear sequence. But it is sounds only, it does not address ordinary explanations, and easy other explanations (house sounds, grief, sleep) fit.
Evidence for and against
- A firsthand story by the letter writer.
- Specific times and places: January 1972, two nights after the funeral, the next night.
- A consistent sequence across two nights.
- No backing beyond a claimed brother.
- Nothing seen and no physical evidence.
- The writer calls it supernatural without addressing ordinary possibilities.
- The letter is read by the host, not the writer.
- The brother does not speak on air.
- The writer's age at the time is not stated.
- 0:29
- 1:18
What the model inferred (not said on air): The editor applies the parts of the scoring guide: a direct witness, specific times and places, a consistent sequence, but easy ordinary explanations and little caution in the claims.
Only the writer's written word and a claimed second witness are present. Names, dates, and places are given but not checked, and no physical evidence is examined.
Evidence for and against
- Named source, location, and date.
- A claimed second witness (the brother).
- No second witness on air.
- No physical evidence or documents examined.
- The brother does not speak on air.
- No physical evidence is claimed.
- 1:42
- 1:28
What the model inferred (not said on air): The editor's judgment is that the named source, location, date, and claimed second witness place it at 11 to 25, but no documents or second witness on air are present.
Sounds of a haunting in the family home after a funeral, with the dead relative's familiar footsteps and her cry at the end of her life that she was dead. It is unsettling but not violent or threatening to look at.
Evidence for and against
- Sounds entering the bedrooms and hallway.
- Familiar sounds of a dead relative after her funeral.
- Mournful sobbing in the grandmother's last days.
- No threat or physical harm.
- No ghost seen.
- The events stop after two nights.
- Nothing is seen; the effect depends on sound and context.
- 0:40
- 0:53
What the model inferred (not said on air): The editor's judgment is that sounds of a haunting in a family home after a funeral are truly unsettling but not threatening or violent.
The letter uses familiar ghost-story elements (footsteps, knocking, a dead relative after a funeral) but includes the unusual detail of the grandmother's cries at the end of her life that she was dead and the specific slipper shuffle on tile.
Evidence for and against
- Stock elements: footsteps, knocking, a dead relative, timing right after a funeral.
- Unusual detail: the grandmother's cries in her last days and the slipper shuffle.
- No strange event beyond familiar sounds.
- No comparison with the rest of the archive is available in this analysis, so the published score is provisional.
- 1:18
What the model inferred (not said on air): The score is a provisional judgment. The comparison with the rest of the archive is not computed here.
Scoring confidence 0.85 · analysis confidence 0.90 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The writer's firsthand written story, as read by the host.; A claimed second witness (the brother) does not speak on air.; No physical evidence or documents examined.. The originality score blends the model's score (45) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- Ordinary settling of the house, a creaking door, and other nighttime sounds in the building could account for the knocking and shuffling noises. · [quote withheld] [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] describe sounds that can occur in a quiet house.
- Grief and expectation after a recent funeral may have shaped how the brothers took unclear sounds. · The sounds occurred [quote withheld] while they were awake and listening, and the writer calls the foot shuffle “familiar” and identifies it as Grandma's.
- Something that happens while falling asleep could explain the second night, when the writer had already fallen asleep before their brother called out. · [quote withheld] and the foot shuffle that followed.
What stands out
The letter reports sounds only. No figure is seen. Its most unusual detail is the grandmother's cries at the end of her life that she was dead, followed after the funeral by the familiar sound of her slippers on tile.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.