Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·5 min·at 2:32:12 in the broadcast

Mobile home on the Barlow Trail: missing objects, faint figures, and a door that flew open

A first-time caller to a Ghost to Ghost broadcast says she is in Red Desert, Wyoming, with a residence in Oregon. She tells one of two incidents: a mobile home she moved into about thirteen years earlier, where objects went missing, faint figures were seen in the living room, and doors and appliances were found open. She reports that a neighbor said the site was on the old Barlow Trail, where a party of settlers was said to have been massacred. She says the activity ended after a night when the back door flew open and nothing was found outside.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 5:28
Play
0:30 · The caller says the family moved into a mobile home about thirteen years before the broadcast. She says strange things began to happen, but never when her husband was there.0:44 · She reports jewelry and important telephone numbers disappearing from the home when she was out or away overnight.1:09 · She reports a constant feeling of foreboding and says her husband dismissed what she told him.1:20 · People from a church blessed the house instead of performing an “exercise” on it. She says things got worse afterward.1:39 · She reports that her son spoke with his father in the home while the father, a truck driver, was away. This made her fear a fatal wreck, but his workplace reported no accident.2:40 · She reports seeing faint figures walking through the living room from the kitchen.3:14 · Neighbors tell her the location is the old Barlow Trail and that settlers camped there were massacred. They describe moaning and crying, and a door in their back bedroom that would not open.5:03 · She reports finding doors, kitchen cabinets, and the refrigerator open and the dishwasher running, and says she used to pry the doors shut.5:12 · One night the back door flew open. She and her husband took guns and found nothing. She says there were no further problems.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 2:32:12). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives only [quote withheld] says she has had two incidents in her life and will give only one. She reports that about thirteen years before the broadcast the family moved into a mobile home, and that [quote withheld] She says her jewelry and important telephone numbers left by the telephone came up missing when she left the room overnight or went to work. She reports a constant [quote withheld] that she likens to a depression, and says her husband thought she [quote withheld] People from a church came out. They would not perform an “exercise” on the house, but they blessed it. She says that after the blessing things [quote withheld] She reports that her son came home from school and talked with his father inside the home while the father, a long-haul truck driver, was away. She feared he had been killed in a wreck, but a call to his work found no accident. She says that at the stove or sink she would watch [quote withheld] the living room, and that items kept disappearing and were never found. Neighbors told her the site is [quote withheld] and that a group of settlers camped there had been massacred by [quote withheld] The neighbors also described hearing a moaning, crying sound in their back bedroom, where a daughter had lived, and a door that could not be opened while the sound lasted and then “just opened.” She says doors, kitchen cabinets, and the refrigerator were found open and the dishwasher running, and that she used to pry doors shut. One weekend night the back door flew open. She and her husband took guns and found nothing outside. She says there have been no problems since.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:30

    The caller says the family moved into a mobile home about thirteen years before the broadcast. She says strange things began to happen, but never when her husband was there.

  2. 0:44

    She reports jewelry and important telephone numbers disappearing from the home when she was out or away overnight.

  3. 1:09

    She reports a constant feeling of foreboding and says her husband dismissed what she told him.

  4. 1:20

    People from a church blessed the house instead of performing an “exercise” on it. She says things got worse afterward.

  5. 1:39

    She reports that her son spoke with his father in the home while the father, a truck driver, was away. This made her fear a fatal wreck, but his workplace reported no accident.

  6. 2:40

    She reports seeing faint figures walking through the living room from the kitchen.

  7. 3:14

    Neighbors tell her the location is the old Barlow Trail and that settlers camped there were massacred. They describe moaning and crying, and a door in their back bedroom that would not open.

  8. 5:03

    She reports finding doors, kitchen cabinets, and the refrigerator open and the dishwasher running, and says she used to pry the doors shut.

  9. 5:12

    One night the back door flew open. She and her husband took guns and found nothing. She says there were no further problems.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:44

    Jewelry and important telephone numbers left in the home disappeared while she was out of the room or at work.

  • observation· 1:09

    She had a constant bad feeling of foreboding in the home.

  • hearsay· 2:01

    Her son told her he had talked with his father inside the home although the father was away on the road.

  • observation· 2:40

    She saw faint figures walking through her living room while she stood at the stove or sink.

  • hearsay· 3:46

    Neighbors told her the site is the old Barlow Trail and that a band of settlers camped there was massacred by [quote withheld]

  • hearsay· 4:04

    Neighbors told her that in their back bedroom they heard moaning and crying, and that a door would not open while the sound lasted.

  • observation· 5:03

    Doors, kitchen cabinets, and the refrigerator were found open and the dishwasher running. One night the back door flew open, and nothing was found outside.

  • interpretation· 3:37

    The caller linked the events, at least in part, to the site's history as the neighbors reported it.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
57

A firsthand story with some concrete anchors (a mobile home, the Barlow Trail, a named neighbor). But it has few checkable details and some garbled passages, and ordinary explanations fit several reported events easily.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand framing: [quote withheld]
  • Specific sequence: missing items, the son's report, faint figures, doors and appliances found open, and the final door event
  • A named place and a named neighbor: [quote withheld] and “[name withheld]”
Against
  • No dates and no documents, and the host partly rushes the caller ([quote withheld])
  • Several reported events (missing objects, open doors and cabinets, a running dishwasher) fit ordinary household causes
  • Key elements (the son's sighting, the neighbors' experiences) reach the listener secondhand through the caller
Uncertain or missing
  • The transcript is garbled about who spoke to whom around the son's report
  • The labels showing who is speaking switch among several different labels for the same caller
Passages cited
  • 0:30
  • 0:44
  • 4:53

What the model inferred (not said on air): Scores for each part: how close the source is, 20 (a firsthand story with partial details); specificity, 11 (place names but no dates or records); internal consistency, 13 (broadly coherent, with some garbled passages); other explanations, 7 (ordinary causes fit several events and are not addressed); how measured the telling is, 6 (the caller mostly reports what she perceived and links events to the neighbors' history without claiming certainty).

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
18

Nothing is examined. The support is the caller's word, named places, a claimed neighbor, and claimed witnesses who do not speak (the son, the husband, and the neighbors).

Evidence for and against
For
  • Details that could in principle be checked: [quote withheld] “Red Desert, Wyoming,” and the neighbor “[name withheld]”
  • Other witnesses are claimed: the son's reported sighting and the neighbors' reported experiences
Against
  • No photograph, recording, document, or mark is offered or examined
  • No second witness speaks on air
  • No outside check was made
Uncertain or missing
  • The neighbor's story is repeated by the caller, not by the neighbor
  • It is unclear whether the son ever spoke to the host
Passages cited
  • 2:01
  • 3:54

What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed in the range of 11 to 25 on the scoring guide because named places and a named neighbor are given but never checked, and all other witnesses are claimed rather than heard.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
58

An intrusion into a home: objects vanishing, faint figures crossing the living room, a claimed massacre on the site, moaning and crying reported in a bedroom, and a back door flying open at night. The ending is abrupt but not graphically violent.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Faint figures seen inside the home: [quote withheld]
  • A claimed massacre at the location: [quote withheld]
  • Moaning, crying, and a jammed door in a bedroom: [quote withheld]
  • A nighttime door event: [quote withheld]
Against
  • No reported injury, physical contact, or harm
  • The caller says the activity stopped: [quote withheld]
  • The caller describes her foreboding in everyday terms rather than as terror
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the neighbors' bedroom events occurred at the same property or a nearby one is not made fully clear
Passages cited
  • 2:55
  • 5:12

What the model inferred (not said on air): Rated in the middle range: steady low-level dread plus intrusion into a home, without sustained escalation, physical harm, or a graphically disturbing image.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
53

Familiar haunted-home elements (missing objects, doors opening, faint figures, a massacre explanation) with one distinctive detail: a son's reported conversation with his father, who was alive but away.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A son reports speaking with his father inside the home while the father is away: [quote withheld]
  • An unusual combination of a mobile home, a claimed massacre of settlers, and the neighbors' story of moaning and crying
Against
  • Stock elements dominate: objects moved, doors opening, faint figures, and an explanation rooted in past violence
  • No distinctive mechanism, object, or verifiable detail beyond the family sighting
Uncertain or missing
  • How new the story is compared with the rest of the archive is provisional. The content-based score is my own estimate
Passages cited
  • 2:40
  • 2:01

What the model inferred (not said on air): My content-based originality score is 40 (a familiar frame with one distinctive detail). The published originality score will be computed by comparison with the rest of the archive.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story (partial, rushed at the end); Secondhand reports from the caller's son and neighbors, passed on by the caller; No documents, photographs, recordings, or physical traces offered or examined. The originality score blends the model's score (40) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Items reported missing and doors and cabinets found open could result from misplacement or ordinary household use rather than something unseen. · The caller says [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
  • Faint figures glimpsed briefly across a room during routine tasks could be a trick of perception or expectation rather than a real figure. · The caller describes [quote withheld] seen from the stove or sink.
  • The son's reported conversation with his father could reflect a remembered routine or a secondhand retelling, since it is told by the mother rather than the son. · The caller reports the son's words: [quote withheld]

What stands out

The story mixes an everyday haunted-mobile-home tale with a claimed explanation from history, a massacre, that comes from the neighbors rather than the caller. It also includes a son's reported sighting of his father, who was alive but away. It ends abruptly with a single door opening and the caller's statement that the problems stopped.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.