Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·5 min·at 24:07 in the broadcast

Teen dream of a house and pasture, later found ruined near St. Louis airport

A caller who gives no name or location says that in their teens they had two dreams in one night. The first showed an idyllic road with grazing livestock and an old house; the second showed the same road with dead animals and an axe attack. About six months later, the caller says, they and two companions found a ruined house off a driveway near the St. Louis airport, felt a presence, and fled when their Jeep would not start. The caller ends by saying that over the years, the only explanation they and their cousin agreed on was an economic one.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.80
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 4:54
Play
0:10 · In their teens, the caller dreams of walking a road past grazing sheep, cattle, and horses to a beautiful old Civil War–style house, where a woman watering a birdbath waves and smiles at them.1:01 · The caller wakes feeling pleasure, smokes part of a cigarette, drinks water, and goes back to bed.1:12 · In a second dream the same night, the caller walks the same road feeling uncomfortable and finds the livestock dead, the fence peeling, and the house in shambles.1:47 · The caller dreams of a man chasing a woman with an axe and striking her. She comes back zombie-like, holding the axe, with blood on her head, and the caller hears a scream and a thud.2:34 · The caller wakes with their heart pounding.2:42 · About six months later, the caller is driving with their cousin and a friend near the St. Louis airport, which was then very undeveloped.2:47 · The caller has a strange feeling and asks the others to pull into a driveway.2:52 · They find the place in shambles, with half a brick chimney down and the roof on the ground.3:05 · All three get “bad vibes.” The caller notices a thorn tree in front of where the window from the dream was.3:26 · The caller says they felt something surrounding them, said nothing to each other, and walked back toward the Jeep, then walked fast.3:41 · The Jeep will not start. The cousin puts it in neutral, the friend pushes, and they pop the clutch. It fires up, and they leave.3:56 · At Big Boys, they shut the vehicle down and it starts right back up. They never return to the place.4:40 · Asked whether the dream foretold anything, the caller says they analyzed it over the years and the only cause they agreed on was the current economic situation in America.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 24:07). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller says that [quote withheld] in which they walked down a road past sheep, cattle, and horses grazing in a pasture. The caller came to a beautiful old Civil War–style house with a white picket fence and saw a woman pouring water into a birdbath, who waved and smiled at them. The caller says they woke [quote withheld] smoked part of a cigarette, drank water, and went back to bed. In a second dream the same night, the caller says, they walked the same road feeling uncomfortable. The caller saw the livestock dead and decayed, the picket fence peeling, and the house “in shambles.” The caller watched a man chase a woman with an axe and strike her, and then saw her come back zombie-like with the axe and blood on her head. The caller heard a scream and a thud and woke with their heart pounding. About six months later, the caller says, they were driving with their cousin and a friend near the St. Louis airport, which they describe as then “very much undeveloped.” The caller says they had a strange feeling and asked the others to pull into a driveway, where they found the place in shambles, with half a brick chimney down and the roof on the ground. All three, the caller says, [quote withheld] The caller noticed a thorn tree in front of where the window from their dream had been. The caller says they felt something surrounding them and walked silently back to the Jeep. It would not start until their cousin put it in neutral, their friend pushed, and they popped the clutch. At a Big Boys hamburger stand, the vehicle restarted normally. The caller says they never went back. Asked whether the dream foretold what happened, the caller says they analyzed it over the years with their cousin, who the caller says is high up in AT&T. The caller says the only cause they could all agree on was [quote withheld]

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:10

    In their teens, the caller dreams of walking a road past grazing sheep, cattle, and horses to a beautiful old Civil War–style house, where a woman watering a birdbath waves and smiles at them.

  2. 1:01

    The caller wakes feeling pleasure, smokes part of a cigarette, drinks water, and goes back to bed.

  3. 1:12

    In a second dream the same night, the caller walks the same road feeling uncomfortable and finds the livestock dead, the fence peeling, and the house in shambles.

  4. 1:47

    The caller dreams of a man chasing a woman with an axe and striking her. She comes back zombie-like, holding the axe, with blood on her head, and the caller hears a scream and a thud.

  5. 2:34

    The caller wakes with their heart pounding.

  6. 2:42

    About six months later, the caller is driving with their cousin and a friend near the St. Louis airport, which was then very undeveloped.

  7. 2:47

    The caller has a strange feeling and asks the others to pull into a driveway.

  8. 2:52

    They find the place in shambles, with half a brick chimney down and the roof on the ground.

  9. 3:05

    All three get “bad vibes.” The caller notices a thorn tree in front of where the window from the dream was.

  10. 3:26

    The caller says they felt something surrounding them, said nothing to each other, and walked back toward the Jeep, then walked fast.

  11. 3:41

    The Jeep will not start. The cousin puts it in neutral, the friend pushes, and they pop the clutch. It fires up, and they leave.

  12. 3:56

    At Big Boys, they shut the vehicle down and it starts right back up. They never return to the place.

  13. 4:40

    Asked whether the dream foretold anything, the caller says they analyzed it over the years and the only cause they agreed on was the current economic situation in America.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:10

    The caller says that as a teenager they dreamed of walking a road past grazing livestock to an old house where a woman waved at them.

  • observation· 0:37

    The caller says that in the dream a woman was pouring water into a birdbath and waved and smiled at them.

  • observation· 1:47

    The caller says that in the second dream they saw a man chasing a woman with an axe.

  • observation· 2:04

    The caller says the woman came back holding the axe with blood coming out of her head.

  • observation· 2:47

    The caller says that about six months later, near the St. Louis airport, they had a strange feeling and asked to pull into a driveway.

  • observation· 3:26

    The caller says they and their companions felt something surrounding them and did not speak to each other.

  • observation· 3:41

    The caller says the Jeep would not start when they tried to leave.

  • host statement· 4:15

    The host asks whether the dream foretold what happened at the place.

  • interpretation· 4:40

    The caller says the only cause they and their cousin could agree on was the current economic situation in America.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
55

A firsthand story with a clear sequence and some concrete anchors. But it gives no dates, names, or street, most elements have an obvious ordinary explanation, and the final claim about the cause is unclear.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand: the caller describes both the dreams and the later visit directly.
  • Concrete anchors: [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
  • A consistent order of dream, waking, and a visit [quote withheld]
  • The caller separates what they dreamed from what they later found.
Against
  • No date, no name, no street. The events are dated only as [quote withheld]
  • The dream content and a ruined property near an airport have simple ordinary explanations.
  • The phrase “bad vibes” describes a personal impression, not an event.
  • The Jeep failing to start once and restarting later is a common mechanical problem.
  • The final explanation ([quote withheld]) is unclear and does not fit the rest of the story.
Uncertain or missing
  • The labels showing who is speaking switch between the host and the caller within the caller's own sentences, so who said some lines is uncertain.
  • The caller's closing explanation at the end of this part of the broadcast is incomplete.
Passages cited
  • 0:10
  • 2:47
  • 4:40

What the model inferred (not said on air): My judgments on each part of the score are inferences. I treat the ruined house, the felt unease, and the one time the vehicle would not start as easily explained by ordinary circumstances, which lowers the score for alternative explanations. The story itself gives no checkable details beyond the airport and a hamburger chain.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
12

Only the caller's word is offered, plus companions who are said to have been there but never speak on air. A few place names could be checked in principle, but nothing was checked.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Details that could in principle be checked are given: [quote withheld] and the stop at Big Boys.
  • The caller names companions (a cousin and, apparently, “[name withheld]”) as present.
Against
  • No documents, photographs, recordings, or physical traces are offered.
  • The two companions are said to have been there but do not speak on air.
  • No dates or addresses are given that would allow someone to find the property.
Uncertain or missing
  • The property's exact location is not given beyond a general area.
  • The identity of the second companion is only inferred from [quote withheld]
Passages cited
  • 2:42
  • 3:05

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score follows the range in the scoring guide for claimed witnesses and unchecked details. I have not treated the companions' shared reaction, which only the caller reports, as backing up the story.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
60

The second dream contains a vivid axe attack with blood, and the later visit to the ruined house builds a shared dread that ends with them fleeing. The violent content is presented as a dream, though.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A man chasing a woman with an axe and striking her in the head.
  • The woman returning “zombic-like” with the axe and blood coming out of her head.
  • The ruined house, the thorn tree, the sense of something surrounding them, and the silent retreat.
  • The Jeep refusing to start as they try to leave.
Against
  • The violent images occur in a dream, not while the caller is awake.
  • No one is reported harmed in the real-life events.
  • The story ends with the group leaving safely and never returning.
Uncertain or missing
  • The time of day of the visit to the ruins is not stated.
  • The description of the attack is partly muddled in the automatic transcript.
Passages cited
  • 1:47
  • 3:26

What the model inferred (not said on air): The creepiness score is my editorial judgment of how the story plays to a listener. It gives weight to the vivid violence in the dream and the growing unease at the site.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
56

The frame of a dream that foretells a place is familiar. But the paired idyllic and violent dreams of the same route, the ruined house with the thorn tree, and the vehicle that will not start give it distinctive detail.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Two dreams of the same road in a single night, one pastoral and one violent.
  • A later visit to a ruined property with a chimney down and the roof on the ground.
  • The thorn tree standing where the window in the dream had been.
  • The vehicle failing to start at the site and restarting normally afterward.
Against
  • Dreams that later match a place are a common ghost-story frame.
  • The ruined house and the group's unease are standard elements of a haunted place.
Uncertain or missing
  • Comparison with the rest of the archive carries little weight in a small pilot set.
  • No similar story was examined for this assessment.
Passages cited
  • 1:12
  • 2:52

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is a provisional estimate based on the story's content. The published originality score is calculated by comparison with the rest of the archive and may differ.

Scoring confidence 0.70 · analysis confidence 0.75 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story; Witnesses the caller mentions (a cousin and a friend, apparently “[name withheld]”) who do not speak on air; No documents, photographs, or physical evidence offered. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Ordinary dream images, later matched by coincidence or by noticing only what fit, when the group came upon a ruined property near the airport. · The caller describes two dreams in one night with a waking in between, and the real-life visit is dated only as [quote withheld] with nothing to document it.
  • Expectation and suggestion among the three companions at a site that really was ruined, which the caller says produced a shared unease. · [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] at the ruined house.
  • A mechanical fault in an older vehicle that failed to start at the site and restarted normally later. · [quote withheld] at the ruins, then [quote withheld] at Big Boys.

What stands out

The story pairs two dreams of the same route in a single night, one idyllic and one violent, with a later visit to a real, ruined property. It ends not with a ghost explanation but with an economic one that the caller says they and their cousin settled on.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.