A 1964 television that kept playing after being unplugged
A caller named [name withheld], from Oak Cliff in Dallas County, tells Art Bell about a night in 1964. The 19-inch black-and-white television that her six-year-old son slept beside kept switching itself on. She says it kept playing even after she unplugged it from the wall. She reports giving the set away, moving soon after, and taking her children to her mother's house in the middle of the night. She asks whether it could have been a ghost, and says no one has ever explained it to her.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 1:29:29). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
[name withheld], calling from Oak Cliff in Dallas County and listening on KLIF 570, tells Art Bell that her “incident” happened in 1964. She was living in a three-room duplex and saving to buy her first house. Her six-year-old son slept in the front room, where the family had a 19-inch portable black-and-white television. She says they came in late on a Sunday night, and she told the boy not to watch TV because he had to get up early and she had to be at work at 7 a.m. She says she then saw the flash of the television on the wall and went in, believing he was disobeying. She told him he had turned it on, and he replied, [quote withheld] She says she switched it off and went back to bed. A few minutes later the light was blinking on the wall again. She says she went back in intending to spank him, found the TV on, and unplugged it from the wall. After that, she says, it was still playing. She says it frightened her so badly that she gave the television away and moved to another place the next week. She also bundled up her children and went to her mother's house in the middle of the night. Art asks whether the set had a remote control. She says it was 1964, with a plain on-and-off knob. She tells Art that someone told her it might be [quote withheld] connected with the Alaska earthquake of that period. She says she does not understand electricity, radios, or televisions. She asks whether it could be a ghost or a “booger.” Art tells her it cannot happen and that she did the right thing.
Reported events, in order
- 0:22
[name withheld] says her incident happened in 1964, the year of the Alaska earthquake.
- 0:31
She describes living in a three-room duplex and saving to buy her first house. Her six-year-old son slept in the front room, where the 19-inch portable black-and-white TV stood.
- 0:49
She says they came in late on a Sunday night and she told her son not to watch TV because they had to get up early.
- 1:16
She reports the television came on and she saw the brightness flash on the wall. She thought her son was disobeying.
- 1:30
She says her son told her he did not touch it, and she switched the TV off.
- 1:39
She reports the light blinking on the wall again a few minutes later, and the TV back on when she went in.
- 1:54
She says she unplugged the television from the wall and it was still playing.
- 2:03
She says she gave the TV away and moved to another place the following week.
- 2:25
Art asks whether the set was remote-controlled. She says it was 1964, with a plain on/off knob.
- 2:37
She says she bundled up her children and went to her mother's house in the middle of the night.
- 2:53
She says someone told her it might be something other than electrons, tied to the Alaska earthquake.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 1:16
[name withheld] says the television came on by itself while her son was supposed to be sleeping.
- observation· 1:19
She says she saw the brightness of the set flashing on the wall.
- hearsay· 1:30
She says her son denied having touched the television.
- observation· 1:39
She says the television came on a second time after she had switched it off.
- observation· 1:54
She says the television was still playing after she unplugged it from the wall.
- interpretation· 2:14
She reports being unable to find anyone who can explain how the set played while unplugged.
- interpretation· 3:22
She asks whether the event could have been a ghost.
- hearsay· 3:00
She says someone told her the event might be something other than electrons, connected to the Alaska earthquake.
- host statement· 3:28
Art tells her that a television cannot play while unplugged.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
A firsthand, specific story with a concrete setting and sequence. But it is a single event that happened once, with no one else to back it up, and an easy though imperfect electrical explanation that the caller says outright she cannot judge.
Evidence for and against
- A firsthand witness describing what she herself saw and did.
- Concrete detail: the year, the room arrangement, the television's size and type, her work schedule, the radio station.
- A consistent sequence of turning the set off, seeing it come on again, and unplugging it.
- The caller separates what she perceived from what she concluded, saying repeatedly that she cannot explain it.
- No second on-air witness. The son's denial is reported, not independent.
- A single event, with no repeat or other strange events.
- The caller says she does not understand electricity or televisions, so the key physical claim rests on her reading of what she unplugged.
- Whether the plug she removed was the television's power cord is not established.
- The reference to the Alaska earthquake is muddled in the transcript, and its connection is not made clear.
- 1:54
- 3:05
What the model inferred (not said on air): Component estimate: source proximity 21, specificity 13, internal consistency 14, alternative explanations 4, calibration 10. The low mark for alternative explanations reflects that an ordinary electrical reading of the events is plausible but is neither tested nor addressed in the transcript.
Only the caller's own word, plus specifics that could be checked (year, city, station) but were not. The television was given away, and there is no documentation or on-air second witness.
Evidence for and against
- Specifics that could be checked are supplied: 1964, Oak Cliff and Dallas, KLIF 570, a 19-inch black-and-white set.
- The caller names a physical object that existed, though she says she gave it away.
- No photograph, recording, or document is presented or examined.
- No second witness speaks on air.
- The physical object said to be involved was thrown out, so it cannot be inspected.
- Whether any record of the duplex, the set, or the date could be checked is not addressed in the transcript.
- 2:03
- 2:22
What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed at 11 to 25 because specifics that could be checked are given, but nothing was checked and no other witness speaks on air.
A single strange event in the home, with no threat or malevolence. But the caller's fear, and her flight from the apartment with her children in the middle of the night, give the story a mildly unsettling edge.
Evidence for and against
- An everyday household object behaving impossibly in a room where a child is sleeping.
- The caller says it frightened her badly enough to give the set away, move, and leave for her mother's house at night.
- No figure, voice, injury, or menace is reported.
- The event happened once, and Art treats it as something to walk away from, not something threatening.
- The transcript does not say what was on the screen while the set was said to be playing.
- 2:37
What the model inferred (not said on air): Rated in the lower middle of the scale because intrusion and impossibility are present, but danger and lasting dread are not.
An appliance running by itself is a familiar idea. But the specific claim that the set kept playing after being unplugged, and the setting of a mother and child with their sleeping arrangement, give it a distinguishing detail.
Evidence for and against
- The unplugged-set detail is a specific and fairly uncommon version of the self-running appliance theme.
- The 1964 black-and-white set and the son sleeping in the front room are details of their period.
- Televisions that switch themselves on are a recurring feature of ghost lore.
- The story ends with the familiar beats of getting rid of the object and moving out.
- How new it is compared with the rest of the archive cannot be judged from this one part of the broadcast.
- 1:54
What the model inferred (not said on air): A provisional automatic score only. The published originality would be blended with how rare the themes are across the archive once more stories exist.
Scoring confidence 0.72 · analysis confidence 0.78 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story on a live call; A named physical object (the television) said to have been given away, not examined; No documentation, recording, or on-air second witness. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- The set may have stayed connected to a second power source (a different cord, or an outlet circuit she did not remove), so what she unplugged was not the television's power cord. · She says [quote withheld] and states [quote withheld]
- Leftover charge in an old tube set's capacitors could briefly keep up sound or a fading picture, giving the impression that it kept playing. · She describes the television as a [quote withheld] from 1964 with a [quote withheld]
- The second switching-on was done by the child in the room, as the caller first suspected. · She reports [quote withheld] and went in [quote withheld] the second time.
What stands out
The story turns on one sharply defined physical claim: a 1964 tube television said to keep playing after its plug was pulled. It does not turn on a figure, a voice, or a presence. The caller presents it as a question she has never been able to answer. She says she threw out the set and left the apartment instead of looking into it further.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.