Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 30, 1997 (possible)·Caller's story·2 min·at 2:21:11 in the broadcast

Figure at foot of bed walks through bedroom wall, father’s childhood story

A caller who identifies themselves as [quote withheld] retells a story their father told them. It is about an event when the father was about four years old, in Canada. The father and his sisters were in bed around 2 a.m. when a figure appeared at the foot of the bed, looked at him, then turned and walked through the bedroom wall. The caller says their father, now 72, has never worked out who or what it was. Art Bell responds by remarking that physical adults do not walk through walls.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldSecondhand · Live call
0:00 / 1:31
Play
0:17 · The caller says the story was told to them by their father and happened when the father was about four years old.0:28 · The caller places the event about “60-some years” earlier, while the father was growing up in Canada.0:34 · The father and a couple of his sisters were in bed asleep around 2 a.m. when his little sister elbowed him and told him to look.0:47 · The father looked up and saw a figure standing at the foot of the bed looking at him. The caller says there was no noise.1:02 · The caller describes the bedroom door to their left and the second-story wall to their right.1:13 · The figure looked at the father quietly, turned toward the wall, and walked straight through it.1:20 · The caller says their father to this day cannot figure out who or what the figure was.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 2:21:11). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives their name as [name withheld] and says they are calling from Fairbanks, tells Art Bell that the story is one their father told them, from when the father was about four years old. The father is now 72, so the caller places it [quote withheld] while the father was growing up in Canada. According to the caller, their father and [quote withheld] were in bed asleep at about 2 o’clock in the morning when his little sister elbowed him and said, [quote withheld] The father looked up and, the caller says, saw a figure standing at the foot of the bed looking at him. There was, the caller adds, no noise at all. The caller describes the room layout. The bedroom door was to their left and the wall to their right, a second-story wall that dropped to the ground. The figure, the caller says, looked quietly at the father, turned toward the wall, and walked straight through it. That, the caller says, was all the father saw. The caller states that to this day their father cannot work out who or what the figure was. Art Bell replies that physical adults in this world do not walk through walls, at least not any he knows of. No names of the town, the sisters, or the house are given. The caller does not say whether anyone else in the room saw the figure. The story is passed on entirely as the father’s account.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:17

    The caller says the story was told to them by their father and happened when the father was about four years old.

  2. 0:28

    The caller places the event about “60-some years” earlier, while the father was growing up in Canada.

  3. 0:34

    The father and a couple of his sisters were in bed asleep around 2 a.m. when his little sister elbowed him and told him to look.

  4. 0:47

    The father looked up and saw a figure standing at the foot of the bed looking at him. The caller says there was no noise.

  5. 1:02

    The caller describes the bedroom door to their left and the second-story wall to their right.

  6. 1:13

    The figure looked at the father quietly, turned toward the wall, and walked straight through it.

  7. 1:20

    The caller says their father to this day cannot figure out who or what the figure was.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 0:34

    The caller’s father, at about age four, was asleep in bed with a couple of his sisters around 2 a.m.

  • hearsay· 0:34

    The father’s little sister elbowed him and told him to look.

  • hearsay· 0:47

    The father looked up and saw a figure standing at the foot of the bed looking at him.

  • hearsay· 0:53

    The figure made no noise.

  • hearsay· 1:13

    The figure turned toward the wall and walked straight through it.

  • interpretation· 1:20

    The caller’s father never worked out who or what the figure was.

  • host statement· 1:25

    The host states that physical adults do not walk through walls.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
52

A secondhand story from a close source (the caller’s father), coherent and brief, with some concrete specifics (age four, about 2 a.m., Canada, a second-story wall). But it has no town, date, or checkable details, and an easy half-asleep explanation goes unaddressed.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The source is close and identified as the caller’s father, with a stated age at the time.
  • Concrete elements: time of night, sleeping arrangement, bedroom layout, the figure’s actions.
  • The sequence is coherent, and the story does not grow into further claims.
Against
  • The caller is not the one who saw it. The story is relayed from someone else.
  • No town, no street, no date, and no full names are given.
  • The father was a four-year-old roused from sleep at about 2 a.m., a state in which images can arise without anyone there.
Uncertain or missing
  • The labels showing who is speaking shift mid-story (the caller labeled as the caller, and caller lines labeled as the host), so who said some sentences is uncertain.
  • The transcript reads [quote withheld] where [quote withheld] is likely meant. It is unclear what was actually said.
Passages cited
  • 0:17
  • 0:47
  • 1:20

What the model inferred (not said on air): Component scoring is my judgment: closeness to the source about 10 (secondhand from a close relative), specificity about 11, internal consistency about 13, other explanations about 9 (a half-awake experience by a four-year-old is not addressed), calibration about 9, total 52, within the cap of 60 for secondhand stories.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
12

Nothing beyond asserted word is present: no names of places that could be checked, no documents, photographs, or recordings, and the claimed second witness (the sister) does not speak on air.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A claimed additional witness is implied: the sister who woke the father and told him to look.
  • A name and a stated location (Fairbanks) are given for the caller.
Against
  • No physical evidence, documentation, or recording is claimed to exist.
  • The only claimed witness other than the father does not appear on air.
  • No town or address in Canada is given, so the site cannot be located.
Uncertain or missing
  • It is not clear from the transcript whether the sister actually saw the figure or only pointed it out.
  • Transcription errors make the exact wording of key sentences uncertain.
Passages cited
  • 0:34
  • 1:13

What the model inferred (not said on air): I place this in the 11 to 25 range only because a second witness is claimed. Since that witness is reported secondhand and never speaks, I set the score near the bottom of that range (12). No outside check was performed, so the cap of 50 applies.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
45

A silent figure standing at the foot of a bed in a dark room, seen by a small child, then walking through a wall and never explained, is truly unsettling. But it carries no threat, contact, or rise in tension.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Intrusion into a bedroom while the people in it are asleep at about 2 a.m.
  • The figure is described as standing and silently looking at the child before moving.
  • The event is left unexplained decades later.
Against
  • No physical contact, harm, or menace is reported.
  • The story is a brief, calmly told anecdote without rising tension.
  • The host’s closing comment is conversational rather than dramatic.
Uncertain or missing
  • The wording describing the figure’s appearance is partly garbled in the transcript, so the visual detail is imprecise.
Passages cited
  • 0:53
  • 1:09

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is a judgment about the story’s effect on a listener, not about truth. The bedroom setting and the child witness raise it above a mildly eerie rating, but the absence of threat keeps it below the midpoint.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
52

The frame, a figure at the foot of the bed in a dark bedroom, is a stock ghost-story element. But the figure turning and walking bodily through a second-story wall, plus the story being a call-in retelling of a parent’s childhood memory, gives it some distinctiveness.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The figure is said to walk through a solid wall of an upstairs room rather than vanishing or leaving by a door.
  • The story is a family story passed down twice, told by a son about his father.
  • A specific detail of the layout (door to the left, wall dropping to the ground) is included.
Against
  • A bedroom visitor, nighttime, a silent figure, and an unexplained ending are all common themes.
  • The story is short and uses no unusual storytelling devices.
Uncertain or missing
  • This is a provisional model estimate. The score compared with the rest of the archive will be computed later and may change the published value.
Passages cited
  • 0:47
  • 1:13

What the model inferred (not said on air): I score the content against common themes: the familiar bedroom-visitor frame (about 50), with the wall-walking detail lifting it slightly, giving about 55.

Scoring confidence 0.55 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s secondhand report of their father’s story.; A claimed additional witness (the father’s sister) who does not speak on air.; No documentation, photograph, recording, or physical trace claimed.. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A child of about four, roused from sleep at around 2 a.m. in a dark room, may have seen a half-awake figure that was not physically there. · The caller says they were [quote withheld] and that the sister woke the father by elbowing him. So he was roused from sleep at the time of the sighting.
  • A living person in the room, or a shape formed by light, shadow, or furniture in an unlit bedroom, could be seen as a still figure standing at the foot of the bed. · The figure is described as silent ([quote withheld]) and as simply standing and looking before turning away.

What stands out

This is a family story passed down twice: a caller relaying a childhood memory of their father. Its distinctive detail is that the figure is said to have turned and walked bodily through a second-story outside wall rather than vanishing or walking out of a door.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.