Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 30, 1997 (possible)·Host's story·4 min·at 2:34 in the broadcast

Loud crash on the host’s radio room door during a broadcast break

The host tells of a single loud crash on the door of his home radio room the previous night, during a break in an interview with a guest. He reports finding nothing outside the door. He checked the house with a weapon, woke his wife (who denied any part), and found all three cats asleep on the bed. He says he does not know what caused it but is certain it was “not nothing.”

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.65
How it was toldFirsthand · Told by the host
0:00 / 3:46
Play
0:19 · The host says something happened at his home the previous night during the Steiger interview, at a time he cannot recall.0:47 · At the start of a break he runs bumper music, removes his headset, and prepares to leave the radio room.1:53 · He reports a very loud crash on the radio room door, which he distinguishes from a knock, house settling, or a sonic boom.2:09 · He says the impact was loud enough that the door would have visibly buckled had he seen it.2:46 · He turns and opens the door and reports finding nothing.2:48 · He gets a weapon and checks the house.2:56 · He wakes his wife and asks if she made the noise. She denies it, annoyed at being woken.3:12 · He notes that his three cats, including a twenty-pound cat that might have hit the door, were all asleep on the bed with his wife.3:34 · He concludes something hit the door hard, that he does not know what it was, and that it frightened him.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 2:34). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

Speaking on air, the host says that [quote withheld] at his home during the previous night’s interview with a guest he names as Brad Steiger, though he cannot recall the exact time. He suspects the event may have been connected to the ghostly subject matter being discussed. He says he suspects that when you [quote withheld] He describes being at the start of one of his breaks. He ran the bumper music, prepared to get up and go into the other room, and removed his headset. As he turned, he reports a crash on the door of his radio room, which he calls his shack. The door is adorned only by a placard reading “radio room” that a listener had sent him from a ship. He stresses it was not a knock, not a house-settling noise, and not a sonic boom. It was a crash so loud, he says, that it would have buckled the door inward had he seen it. He turned and opened the door: “There was nothing.” Concerned, he says he got a weapon and checked the house. Then he woke his wife and asked whether she had made the noise. Annoyed at being woken, she replied, “of course not.” He notes he has three cats and that one, a twenty-pounder, might have thrown itself at the door. But all three were asleep on the bed with his wife. He concludes that something hit the door hard, that he has no idea what it was, and that it frightened him badly.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:19

    The host says something happened at his home the previous night during the Steiger interview, at a time he cannot recall.

  2. 0:47

    At the start of a break he runs bumper music, removes his headset, and prepares to leave the radio room.

  3. 1:53

    He reports a very loud crash on the radio room door, which he distinguishes from a knock, house settling, or a sonic boom.

  4. 2:09

    He says the impact was loud enough that the door would have visibly buckled had he seen it.

  5. 2:46

    He turns and opens the door and reports finding nothing.

  6. 2:48

    He gets a weapon and checks the house.

  7. 2:56

    He wakes his wife and asks if she made the noise. She denies it, annoyed at being woken.

  8. 3:12

    He notes that his three cats, including a twenty-pound cat that might have hit the door, were all asleep on the bed with his wife.

  9. 3:34

    He concludes something hit the door hard, that he does not know what it was, and that it frightened him.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 1:53

    The host heard a very loud crash on his radio room door during a broadcast break.

  • observation· 2:46

    When he opened the door immediately afterward, he found nothing there.

  • observation· 3:12

    All three cats were asleep on the bed with his wife, ruling out the cats as the source.

  • hearsay· 3:03

    His wife, when woken, denied making the noise.

  • interpretation· 0:30

    He suspects the event may be connected to talking about ghostly subjects on air, since such things “notice.”

  • interpretation· 3:34

    He states he has no idea what caused the crash, but is certain it was something rather than nothing.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
68

This is a detailed, consistent first-person story of a single event. The obvious ordinary candidates (cats, house settling, aircraft) are raised and addressed. But there are no checkable details beyond the host’s own home and no independent observation.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand story from the person who reports experiencing it.
  • Concrete sequence: break begins, headset removed, crash, door opened, house searched, wife woken, cats checked.
  • He separates what he perceived from what he concluded and says he does not know the cause.
  • He raises and rejects specific ordinary alternatives.
Against
  • The loudness and the “would have buckled” quality are subjective and unwitnessed. He says he did not see the impact.
  • No exact time given, no location, and no checkable records or names beyond a guest mention.
  • The one other possible witness (his wife) was asleep and denied involvement rather than backing up the story.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether any object near the door could have fallen or been struck is not addressed.
  • The host’s earlier framing about “inviting these things” may shape how he tells the event.
Passages cited
  • 1:53
  • 2:46
  • 3:12
  • 3:34

What the model inferred (not said on air): My judgment of each part (closeness to the source, detail, consistency, alternative explanations, caution in claims) applies the scoring guide. The only transcript content is the quoted narration.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
6

The story rests entirely on the host’s own word. No physical evidence is described or examined, and the only other person mentioned was asleep and denied involvement rather than confirming anything.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The host gives a specific setting (his own radio room) and a described sequence of actions after the noise.
Against
  • No photograph, recording, mark, or document is claimed or produced.
  • The wife is reported secondhand and does not speak on air.
  • No names, dates, or places that could be checked are supplied.
Uncertain or missing
  • It is not stated whether anything at the door or house was later examined.
Passages cited
  • 2:48
  • 3:03

What the model inferred (not said on air): Placing it in the range of 0 to 10 (the host’s word only) is my judgment under the scoring guide, not transcript content.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
45

A sudden, unexplained loud impact at close range inside the host’s own workspace, followed by an armed search of the house and no explanation, is unsettling. But there is no presence, threat, or lasting escalation, and the host himself laughs during the telling.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Sudden violent noise in a private room.
  • He arms himself and searches the house.
  • The story ends with the cause unknown and the host saying it scared him.
Against
  • Single event with no continuation.
  • No figure, contact, injury, or menace reported.
  • The host notes [quote withheld]
Uncertain or missing
  • The loudness he perceived cannot be judged from a transcript.
Passages cited
  • 1:53
  • 3:34

What the model inferred (not said on air): The creepiness rating is my own judgment about the effect of the story, not a statement in the transcript.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
42

An unexplained loud bang on a door is a familiar ghost-story element. The distinctive touches are the ship’s “radio room” placard on the door and the checked, sleeping cats. The score is provisional, since this story is not compared with the rest of the archive here.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Unusual prop detail: a ship’s placard reading “radio room” fixed to the door.
  • The cats are explicitly ruled out as a source.
Against
  • The core event, a loud crash or knock with no source, is a stock motif.
Uncertain or missing
  • Originality is a provisional estimate by the model. No comparison with the rest of the archive was run.
Passages cited
  • 1:15
  • 1:53

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score reflects my comparison against common ghost-story motifs, not transcript content.

Scoring confidence 0.80 · analysis confidence 0.85 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The host’s firsthand story.; Secondhand report of a wife’s denial, not on air.; No physical evidence claimed or examined.. The originality score blends the model's score (35) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A physical impact from an animal or object (for example, one of the cats or something striking the door). · He raises the cats himself, saying one twenty-pounder [quote withheld] and then reports all three were asleep on the bed.
  • Ordinary noise from the house or its surroundings (house settling, a distant aircraft, or something similar). · He rules these out himself: [quote withheld]
  • A person in or around the house, since he searched with a weapon and found no one. · He says he [quote withheld] and then woke his wife to ask if she had done it.

What stands out

The story is a single unexplained loud impact on a door, reported by the host himself, in a room whose only decoration is a ship’s “radio room” placard. It is unusual mainly because it is the host’s own recent experience rather than a caller’s story.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.