Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 30, 1997 (possible)·Caller's story·3 min·at 2:59:44 in the broadcast

Respiratory therapist reports seeing a newly dead patient among his family in an ER lobby

A caller who gives their location as Lynchburg, Virginia, says that while working as a respiratory therapist on a Code Blue team in Houston, Texas, they saw a newly dead patient standing among his family in an emergency room lobby. The caller says the man, still wearing the clothes he died in, appeared translucent and seemed to be trying to get his family's attention. He was mouthing words such as [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] The caller says an unnamed partner also saw it. The call ends with the host commenting on people who do not seem to understand that they have died.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.83
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 3:19
Play
0:30 · The caller says they were a respiratory therapist working in big city hospitals in Houston, Texas, and were on the Code Blue team.0:41 · The caller says a tall gentleman in his late 60s or early 70s, wearing blue jeans and a black and red plaid shirt, came in one night.0:57 · The caller says he had a heart attack and after about 45 minutes of CPR the physicians in charge called it.1:05 · The caller says they and their partner were cleaning resuscitation tubing and paraphernalia and went out into the emergency room hallway.1:12 · The caller says they looked down into the lobby, where about 20 to 30 family members had come and doctors were explaining why the man had died.1:28 · The caller says they could see the man who had just died standing there, waving his hands in front of his family members' faces and going from one to another to get them to see him.1:38 · The caller says they could see him mouthing words like [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]1:49 · The caller says he appeared in a ghostly, see-through image and was still wearing the clothes he had died in.2:08 · The caller says their partner freaked out and lit a cigarette, then lit a second one without realizing the partner still had the first.2:43 · The host remarks that he has heard many stories about people who do not seem to understand that they have died.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 2:59:44). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives their location as Lynchburg, Virginia, says they were a respiratory therapist working in big city hospitals in Houston, Texas, and were on the Code Blue team. The caller says that one night a gentleman in his late 60s or early 70s came in. He was tall and distinct-looking, wearing blue jeans and a black and red plaid shirt. He had a heart attack, and after about 45 minutes of CPR the physicians in charge called it. The caller and their partner were cleaning the tubing and resuscitation paraphernalia, then went out into the hallway of the emergency room. They looked down into the lobby, where about 20 to 30 family members had gathered and doctors were explaining why the man had died. The caller says that, perhaps because the lighting was just right, they could see the man who had just died standing there. He was waving his hands in front of the faces of his family members, going from one to the other, trying to get them to see him. The caller says they could see him mouthing words such as [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] The caller interpreted this as him not knowing he was dead. The caller says he appeared in a ghostly, see-through image and was still wearing the clothes he had died in. The caller says their partner freaked out and lit a cigarette, then lit a second cigarette without realizing the partner still had the first one. The host comments afterward about people who do not seem to understand that they have died.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:30

    The caller says they were a respiratory therapist working in big city hospitals in Houston, Texas, and were on the Code Blue team.

  2. 0:41

    The caller says a tall gentleman in his late 60s or early 70s, wearing blue jeans and a black and red plaid shirt, came in one night.

  3. 0:57

    The caller says he had a heart attack and after about 45 minutes of CPR the physicians in charge called it.

  4. 1:05

    The caller says they and their partner were cleaning resuscitation tubing and paraphernalia and went out into the emergency room hallway.

  5. 1:12

    The caller says they looked down into the lobby, where about 20 to 30 family members had come and doctors were explaining why the man had died.

  6. 1:28

    The caller says they could see the man who had just died standing there, waving his hands in front of his family members' faces and going from one to another to get them to see him.

  7. 1:38

    The caller says they could see him mouthing words like [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]

  8. 1:49

    The caller says he appeared in a ghostly, see-through image and was still wearing the clothes he had died in.

  9. 2:08

    The caller says their partner freaked out and lit a cigarette, then lit a second one without realizing the partner still had the first.

  10. 2:43

    The host remarks that he has heard many stories about people who do not seem to understand that they have died.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:15

    The caller says they saw a newly formed ghost.

  • hearsay· 0:26

    The caller says an unnamed partner also saw the reported figure.

  • observation· 1:28

    The caller says they and their partner could see the man who had just died standing among his family and waving his hands in front of their faces.

  • observation· 1:38

    The caller says the figure appeared to be mouthing words to his family.

  • interpretation· 1:46

    The caller interprets the figure's behavior as meaning he did not know he was dead.

  • observation· 1:49

    The caller says the figure appeared ghostly and see-through.

  • observation· 1:58

    The caller says the figure was still wearing the clothes the patient had died in.

  • host statement· 2:43

    The host asserts he has heard many stories of people who do not seem to understand that they have died.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
72

The caller gives a firsthand, sequential account with specific job and visual details, and they separate some observations from their interpretation. However, the claimed second witness does not speak on air, and none of the details can be independently checked.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller reports taking part directly as a respiratory therapist on the Code Blue team.
  • The story gives concrete details: Houston, Texas, the emergency room hallway, a patient in his late 60s or early 70s, blue jeans and a black and red plaid shirt, about 45 minutes of CPR, and about 20 to 30 family members.
  • The sequence is coherent from the patient's arrival through the resuscitation and the later sighting in the lobby.
  • The caller separates what they saw from their inference that the man did not know he was dead.
Against
  • The only second witness is claimed and does not speak on air.
  • The sighting was made at a distance, from the emergency room hallway down into the lobby.
  • The caller suggests the lighting may have been a factor.
  • No names, dates, or hospital records are provided for checking.
Uncertain or missing
  • The exact hospital and date are not stated.
  • The partner is not named and does not speak on air.
  • The caller's phrase [quote withheld] introduces doubt about the visual conditions.
Passages cited
  • 0:30
  • 1:24
  • 1:46

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score reflects a firsthand, detailed, and internally coherent account, moderated by the lack of independent backing and by the distance and lighting that the caller mentions.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
18

The story rests on the caller's word plus a claimed second witness. No physical evidence or independently checkable documentation is presented.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller gives a specific job and general locations: Houston, Texas, and Lynchburg, Virginia.
  • The caller says an unnamed partner also saw the reported figure.
Against
  • No names, dates, hospital names, or records are provided.
  • The claimed partner does not speak on air.
  • No photograph, recording, or other physical evidence is claimed or examined.
Uncertain or missing
  • No names, dates, hospital names, or records are provided.
  • The claimed second witness does not speak on air.
  • The caller's own perception is the only direct testimony available.
Passages cited
  • 0:26
  • 0:30

What the model inferred (not said on air): The claimed partner is a witness claim, not independent backing, and no documentation is examined on air.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
50

The story is unsettling because a newly dead man is reported to be among his grieving family, apparently unaware of his death. But there is no reported hostility or threat.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The reported figure is a man who has just died and is trying to get his family to see him.
  • The caller says he appeared to be mouthing [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
  • The setting includes a grieving family and a resuscitation that failed.
Against
  • No harm, threat, or hostile intent is reported.
  • The caller and their partner are observers rather than targets.
  • The host's response is conversational rather than alarmed.
Uncertain or missing
  • Listeners may find the story more sad than frightening, which could lower the score.
Passages cited
  • 1:28
  • 1:46

What the model inferred (not said on air): The unease comes from the image of a dead man trying and failing to be seen by his grieving family, rather than from any reported threat.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
55

The story combines a familiar ghost motif with an unusual setting and point of view, but it does not present a wholly new kind of event.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The event is seen from the perspective of emergency medical workers after an unsuccessful resuscitation.
  • The reported figure is not a relative or previous occupant but the newly dead patient trying to reach his own family.
Against
  • The central idea of a ghost not realizing it has died is a recurring ghost-story theme.
  • A translucent figure in a hospital setting is a familiar element.
Uncertain or missing
  • The story is brief and has no later research or documentation to back it up.
Passages cited
  • 0:15
  • 1:28
  • 1:46

What the model inferred (not said on air): The hospital-staff viewpoint and the dead man trying to reach his own family are distinctive. But the translucent ghost and the [quote withheld] idea are familiar ghost-story elements.

Scoring confidence 0.80 · analysis confidence 0.80 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand word.; A claimed second witness, not speaking on air.; No photograph, recording, document, or other physical evidence claimed.. The originality score blends the model's score (58) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A misperception at a distance: a person in the lobby or a visual pattern was taken for the dead patient, possibly helped by the lighting the caller mentions. · The caller says they looked down from the ER hallway into the lobby and adds, [quote withheld]
  • Expectation and emotion after a failed resuscitation could have shaped how an unclear scene was read. · The sighting follows a 45-minute Code Blue resuscitation, and the caller and their partner were cleaning equipment immediately beforehand.
  • A family member or bystander wearing similar clothing (blue jeans and a plaid shirt) was seen through the crowd and mistaken for the dead man. · The caller describes the patient as wearing blue jeans and a black and red plaid shirt and says the figure was seen among 20 to 30 family members.

What stands out

The story is told from the perspective of emergency medical staff who had just tried to save the patient. The reported figure is the newly dead patient trying to get his own family's attention.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.