A figure in period flying gear in the cockpit of a parked F-4 at an Air Force hangar
A caller who gives their name as [name withheld], from Santa Fe, tells Art Bell that about five years earlier they were stationed at an Air Force base in California. They were on a midnight duty post outside a hangar where Vietnam-era jets were on public display during an air show. After hearing a tap on the canopy glass, they say, they looked up and saw what appeared to be a person in the cockpit of an F-4, dressed in goggles, a scarf, and a cap, and grinning at them. They say they left the hangar and told a friend only that they felt sick. They told no one the reason until about two weeks before the broadcast.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1998.mp3”, starting at 2:38:54). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
[name withheld], from Santa Fe, calling live, says that about five years before the broadcast they were serving in the Air Force at a base in California. During an air show, older jets were on display in a hangar open to the public. They were assigned a mid shift, arriving around 11 or 12. Their post was outside the hangar, where they held a list of people allowed to enter. The man they relieved told them it had been quiet and that nobody was inside apart from the aircraft.
They went in with a flashlight and looked at F-4s, F-5s, and Vietnam-era planes, some with bullet holes. They went under the undercarriage of an F-4, checked the lights and the tire, and kicked the tire. Walking away, they say, they heard a tap [quote withheld] [name withheld] turned, looked up, and says they saw what appeared to be a person in the cockpit wearing goggles, a scarf, and a cap. They and the host both describe the look as Red Baron style. They say the figure was “sitting there grinning” at them.
They say they made sure there was nobody in there, went back outside the hangar, called a friend on roaming patrol, and told the friend only that they felt sick. They say they told nobody the reason until about two weeks before the broadcast, when they spoke to one of their friends. The host says he would be reluctant to tell such a story himself and thanks the caller. No further events, explanation, or follow-up are reported.
Reported events, in order
- 0:02
The caller gives their name as [name withheld], from Santa Fe, and says they want to share an experience from their Air Force days.
- 0:12
They say they were stationed at a base in California and that the base held an air show every few years.
- 0:23
Older jets were on display in one hangar that was open to the public.
- 0:31
They worked a mid shift and came in around 11 or 12. Their post was outside the hangar, with a list of people allowed to enter.
- 0:50
The man they relieved told them it had been quiet and that nobody was in the hangar except the aircraft.
- 0:59
They went in and looked around at F-4s, F-5s, and Vietnam-era planes, some with bullet holes.
- 1:12
With a flashlight they went to the undercarriage of an F-4, checked the lights and tire, and kicked the tire.
- 1:36
Walking away, they heard a tap as if someone were tapping on glass.
- 1:42
They turned and looked up and saw what appeared to be somebody sitting in the cockpit.
- 1:50
They say the figure was wearing goggles, a scarf, and a cap, which they compared to the Red Baron.
- 2:00
They say the figure sat there grinning at them, and that they made sure there was nobody in there.
- 2:32
They went back outside the hangar and called a friend on roaming patrol, telling the friend only that they felt sick.
- 2:17
They say they told no one the reason until about two weeks before the broadcast. The event had happened about five years earlier.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 0:12
The caller says they were stationed at a US Air Force base in California during an air show that was open to the public.
- hearsay· 0:50
The guard they relieved told them the hangar had been quiet and that nobody was inside apart from the aircraft.
- observation· 1:36
Walking away from the F-4, they heard a tap that sounded like someone tapping on glass.
- observation· 1:42
Looking up at the cockpit, they saw what appeared to be a person sitting in it.
- observation· 1:50
The figure was wearing gear they describe as like the Red Baron: goggles, a scarf, and a cap.
- observation· 2:00
They say the figure was sitting there grinning at them.
- observation· 2:04
They say they checked and were satisfied that there was nobody inside the aircraft.
- interpretation· 2:17
They say they told no one about what they had seen until about two weeks before the broadcast.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a clear firsthand story told in order, with concrete aircraft and duty-post detail. But it has no names, dates, or checkable specifics, and it has an easy ordinary reading (display cockpit contents seen from below at night) that the caller never rules out. That places it above a bare brief report but below the 70 anchor for stories that take up other explanations.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand story: the caller places themselves at the scene as the duty guard.
- Clear order of events, from arriving at the hangar through the tap, the sighting, the check, and leaving.
- Concrete detail: F-4s and F-5s, Vietnam-era aircraft with bullet holes, the undercarriage, kicking a tire, a list of people allowed to enter, and a mid shift starting around 11 or 12.
- The caller hedges their own perception, saying there was [quote withheld] and that they did not know how to describe the clothing.
- The base and the date are never named, so the setting cannot be checked.
- The story rests on a single witness, with no one backing it up and no physical trace.
- The most obvious ordinary explanation for such a sighting at an air show, a mannequin or stored helmet, goggles, and scarf in a display cockpit, is never addressed by the caller.
- The claim that the hangar was empty comes from the man they relieved, who does not speak on air.
- The automatic transcript renders “hangar” as “Sanger” in several lines.
- [quote withheld] is approximate, and no base is named.
- One line ([quote withheld]) is labeled as the host although its content belongs to the caller.
- 1:12
- 0:50
- 1:42
What the model inferred (not said on air): The component scoring is mine. Closeness to the events is at the high end because the caller claims to have been there. Specificity is mid-range because the concrete details are generic rather than checkable. Other explanations are held low because a display mannequin or flight gear fits easily and was not discussed.
This is the usual case of the caller’s word only: no checkable record, no examined object, and no independent witness. Even the few specifics given (an unnamed base, an approximate date) cannot be checked from the transcript, so the score stays in the bottom band.
Evidence for and against
- The caller gives their own name and city on air as [name withheld] from Santa Fe.
- They give a service, an aircraft type (F-4), and a general time frame ([quote withheld]).
- No document, photograph, recording, or physical trace is claimed.
- The base in California is unnamed, so the setting cannot be located or checked.
- The friend contacted afterward is not reported to have seen anything and does not speak on air.
- No second witness of the figure is named.
- Any check would require finding an unnamed California base and a specific air show year, which the transcript does not supply.
- 2:20
- 0:12
What the model inferred (not said on air): I applied the score band of 0 to 10 for the caller’s word only. I did not credit the claimed conversation with a friend, since nothing backs it up and the friend is not on air.
The image of a figure in period flying dress sitting in a supposedly empty aircraft at night, apparently watching and grinning at the lone guard, is genuinely unsettling, and the tap before it builds a little dread. There is no aggression, chase, or harm, and the story ends with the caller simply leaving.
Evidence for and against
- The setting is an empty hangar at night on a solitary duty post, which the story presents as a safe, routine space.
- There is an unexplained tap on the canopy before the figure is seen, which the caller describes as what made them turn.
- The occupant of a parked aircraft is described in old-fashioned flying gear and is looking directly at the caller, grinning.
- The caller says it “really spooked” them, that they left, and that they told no one the reason for years.
- No threat, pursuit, physical contact, or harm is reported.
- The encounter is brief and never repeats.
- The figure is described only as grinning, with no hostile action.
- The caller does not describe the lighting inside the hangar, so the visual conditions are unclear.
- Whether the “grin” was a facial expression or the look of the flight gear cannot be determined from the transcript.
- 1:36
- 2:00
- 2:07
What the model inferred (not said on air): My judgment is about the effect of the story rather than the events. The score is driven by the intrusion into a solitary night setting and the direct gaze, moderated by the absence of any reported menace.
A familiar [quote withheld] frame is joined to a distinctive, old-fashioned image: a Red Baron–style aviator seated in a Vietnam-era fighter in a hangar. That combination lifts it above stock material without making it unique. It is scored provisionally, since comparison with the rest of the archive carries little weight at pilot scale.
Evidence for and against
- The combination of an air-show hangar of Vietnam-era jets with a figure dressed in World War I flying gear is unusual.
- The figure is placed inside the cockpit of a parked F-4 rather than in a corridor or room, and is first announced by a tap on canopy glass.
- The caller offers no cause at all and reports no follow-up activity, which is less common than a haunting that grows worse.
- The core frame, an unexpected figure in a supposedly empty building at night, seen once and never again, is a common ghost-story shape.
- The motifs used (nighttime, military setting, a solid-looking figure, period clothing, telling no one) are all familiar in the archive.
- Originality here is provisional and not yet adjusted against the rest of the archive.
- 1:50
- 2:09
What the model inferred (not said on air): My provisional originality judgment is a familiar frame plus a specific old-fashioned detail, roughly 70 to 75. The published figure compared with the rest of the archive would need a calculation across the whole archive.
Scoring confidence 0.72 · analysis confidence 0.80 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: the caller’s firsthand story, given live on air; no physical evidence claimed or examined; no second witness on air; only a claimed remark to a friend that they felt sick. The originality score blends the model's score (70) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- The “figure” could have been a display mannequin or stored flight gear (helmet, mask, goggles, scarf) in the cockpit, seen from underneath in low light. · The caller describes aircraft on public display in a hangar during an air show, examined at night from below with a flashlight. Air-show cockpits commonly hold mannequins, helmets, oxygen masks, and harness gear.
- Looking from below in low light, with reflections on the canopy and the outline of the seat and harness, could make a seated person appear where there was none. · The caller was looking up through the canopy from the undercarriage at night, using a flashlight, and describes the shape only as [quote withheld]
- A living person (for example, another airman or a member of the public) could have been in or around the cockpit at that moment. · The hangar was reachable through controlled entry points during a public air show, and the caller says they afterward checked that nobody was in the aircraft.
What stands out
A pilot in World War I–style flying gear (goggles, scarf, and cap) is reported seated in the cockpit of a Vietnam-era F-4 inside a hangar that was supposed to be empty, announced by a tap on the canopy. The caller offers no explanation and reports no repeat of the experience.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.