Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 1998 (possible)·Caller's story·4 min·at 1:35:29 in the broadcast

Father hears lamp pull-chains jingle and a moan in his ear, 1961

A caller who gives their name as [name withheld], from Woodland Hills, California, tells a story they attribute to their father. One night in 1961 in Dana Point, California, the father was living in an add-on structure behind a partly burned house. According to the caller, he heard the room’s lamp pull-chains jingle. Then he felt a moan and a breath blown into his ear. It happened three times. He fled the room and never slept there again.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 3:39
Play
0:15 · The caller says the story is their father’s, from 1961 in Dana Point, California.0:24 · The father came home late from work to an add-on structure behind a partially burned house.0:47 · He prepared for bed and turned off the pull-chain deco lamps with the wall switch.0:59 · He lay down on a low mattress in a room the caller describes as completely sealed.1:15 · After a minute or two he began hearing the lamp pull-chains jingle.1:29 · Looking up at the ceiling rafters, he reported feeling a moan and a breath blown into his ear.2:08 · The moan and breath repeated, louder and longer, with the chains still rattling.2:23 · It happened a third time. The father felt he had to move and was in danger.2:52 · He jumped out of bed, ran across the room, flipped the light switch, looked back, and saw nothing.3:04 · The lamp chains were reported still moving.3:06 · He left and never slept in that room again.3:13 · The caller says the story still affects them and they cover their ears when sleeping.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1998.mp3”, starting at 1:35:29). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

[name withheld], calling from Woodland Hills, California, tells Art a story they attribute to their father, from 1961 in Dana Point, California. [name withheld] says their father came home late from work. The father was living in an add-on structure behind a house that had partially burned down. Getting ready for bed, he turned off the room’s pull-chain deco lamps with a wall switch. The caller describes the room as completely sealed and the mattress as low to the floor, with no box spring. After a minute or two, according to [name withheld], their father began hearing the lamp pull-chains jingle. While lying on his back looking at the rafters, he reported feeling a moan and a breath blown into his ear. The caller says this happened again, “louder and longer,” and then a third time. [name withheld] says their father sensed he had to move and was in danger. The father jumped out of bed, ran across the room, turned on the light, and looked back. The caller says nothing was visible, but the chains were still moving. According to [name withheld], their father left and never slept in that room again. [name withheld] adds that the story still affects them and that they cover their ears when they sleep. Art responds that this is “fight or flight.”

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:15

    The caller says the story is their father’s, from 1961 in Dana Point, California.

  2. 0:24

    The father came home late from work to an add-on structure behind a partially burned house.

  3. 0:47

    He prepared for bed and turned off the pull-chain deco lamps with the wall switch.

  4. 0:59

    He lay down on a low mattress in a room the caller describes as completely sealed.

  5. 1:15

    After a minute or two he began hearing the lamp pull-chains jingle.

  6. 1:29

    Looking up at the ceiling rafters, he reported feeling a moan and a breath blown into his ear.

  7. 2:08

    The moan and breath repeated, louder and longer, with the chains still rattling.

  8. 2:23

    It happened a third time. The father felt he had to move and was in danger.

  9. 2:52

    He jumped out of bed, ran across the room, flipped the light switch, looked back, and saw nothing.

  10. 3:04

    The lamp chains were reported still moving.

  11. 3:06

    He left and never slept in that room again.

  12. 3:13

    The caller says the story still affects them and they cover their ears when sleeping.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 1:15

    The caller’s father reported hearing lamp pull-chains jingle ([quote withheld]) after lying down in a room described as completely sealed.

  • hearsay· 1:29

    The father reported feeling a moan and a breath blown into his ear while lying on his back looking at the ceiling rafters.

  • hearsay· 2:08

    The same sensation repeated, reported as louder and longer.

  • hearsay· 2:23

    It happened a third time.

  • interpretation· 2:31

    The father concluded he was in danger and had to move, though no source or cause is identified.

  • interpretation· 2:35

    The caller says their father believed he was in danger “for whatever reason.”

  • interpretation· 2:39

    The caller speculates about possession without committing to it.

  • hearsay· 3:04

    After the father switched the light on and saw nothing, the caller says the lamp chains were still moving.

  • host statement· 2:44

    The host frames the father’s reaction as a physical fight-or-flight response.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
58

This is a close, named secondhand report with a concrete time, place, and physical setting and a coherent sequence. But it is not backed up by anyone else, and an explanation based on falling asleep fits the setting reasonably well. It is scored in the upper part of the secondhand range, under the cap of 60.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Close, named source: the caller says the story is their father’s ([quote withheld]).
  • Concrete when, where, and physical setup: 1961, Dana Point, partially burned house, add-on structure, wall switch, low mattress.
  • Ordered, consistent sequence: jingling, moan and breath, repeat, third occurrence, flight, chains still moving.
Against
  • Secondhand: the caller did not experience the events and names no other witness. A score cap of 60 applies.
  • Having just lain down to sleep offers an easy, ordinary explanation for the sounds and the sensation on the ear.
  • The caller adds their own speculation about possession ([quote withheld]).
Uncertain or missing
  • The father’s identity and any backing details are not given.
  • The labels showing who is speaking are automatic, and the transcription of the moan and breath passage is choppy.
Passages cited
  • 0:15
  • 1:09
  • 2:39

What the model inferred (not said on air): The source-proximity range of 8 to 13 for [quote withheld] is applied because the father is identified as the direct experiencer, though unnamed. The point values within each part are my judgment, not statements from the broadcast.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
12

Only the caller’s word is on the table, with some checkable details (a year, a town) that were not verified. This falls in the 11 to 25 range, well under the cap of 50 for an unchecked transcript.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Checkable details are given but not checked: the caller’s name, [name withheld], and location, Woodland Hills, California; the place, Dana Point, California; and the year, 1961.
Against
  • No physical evidence, recording, photograph, or document is mentioned.
  • No second witness speaks on air. The alleged witness is neither present nor named.
Uncertain or missing
  • No outside check was done, so no score above 50 is possible.
Passages cited
  • 0:08
  • 0:19

What the model inferred (not said on air): This uses the scoring guide’s range for [quote withheld] Nothing on air backs up the story.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
58

The bedroom setting, the closeness of the reported breath, and the escalating repetition make this unsettling. There is no visible figure, threat of harm, or graphic content.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Intimate intrusion into a safe space: a moan and breath reported directly into the ear in bed.
  • Repetition and escalation: the sound “louder and longer” and a third occurrence.
  • A reported sense of danger and an unresolved ending: the father never slept there again, and nothing was seen.
Against
  • No figure is seen, no injury or threat occurs, and the event is confined to one night in one room.
  • Art’s closing remarks about closets are conversational rather than ominous.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the “breath” was heard or felt is blurred by the caller and the automatic transcription.
Passages cited
  • 1:35
  • 2:08

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is my judgment of the effect on listeners. The broadcast gives no ratings of its own.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
54

A familiar bedroom-sound story with two distinctive details: pull-chain lamps and a breath in the ear. This is a provisional estimate from the content alone. The comparison with the rest of the archive is computed separately and is provisional in the pilot.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Distinctive detail: the jingling pull-chains of 1960s deco lamps as the sound that came first.
  • An unusual sensation: a moan and a breath reported directly into the ear, felt rather than heard.
  • Rare setting detail: an add-on structure behind a partially burned house.
Against
  • The theme is common: unexplained bedroom sounds and an unseen presence at night.
  • Art notes the theme is familiar ([quote withheld]).
Uncertain or missing
  • Originality compared with the rest of the archive cannot be computed from a single story.
Passages cited
  • 0:34
  • 1:42

What the model inferred (not said on air): This is my estimate of how new the theme is. No comparison with the archive was run here.

Scoring confidence 0.70 · analysis confidence 0.75 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s secondhand word: they report what their father told them.; No physical evidence, photograph, recording, or document claimed.; No second witness speaks on air.. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Sounds and sensations while falling asleep: sounds and a felt breath experienced while drifting off. · The caller says their father had lain down [quote withheld] Sounds and touch sensations at that moment are a common fit for a sensation on the ear.
  • Air movement or an animal disturbing hanging pull-chains in an old or repaired structure. · The father was sleeping in an add-on structure behind [quote withheld] An older or repaired building could allow air movement, although the caller explicitly calls the room “completely sealed.”

What stands out

The story turns on two ordinary household objects, the pull-chain springs of 1960s lamps and a low mattress in a room described as sealed. It also turns on a sensation reported as felt rather than heard: a moan and a breath delivered directly into the ear.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.