A hearse, a voice, and white figures on a winter road in northern Canada
A caller who gives their first name as [name withheld] tells of something the caller says happened to them in high school, when they were 16 or 17, in a small town in northern Canada. The caller was walking alone at night on a snowy road after their friends drove off. The caller reports a panicky feeling, a big black car the caller took for a hearse, a voice quietly saying their name from behind them, and two white figures that moved toward them while calling their name. Then they ran into town. The caller ends by reporting that their friends said they had each felt that [quote withheld] and had turned the car around for them. The host thanks the caller and moves to the next caller.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2004.mp3”, starting at 2:19:48). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The caller, who gives their first name as [name withheld], says the event happened in high school. The caller is 35 at the time of the call and says they stopped telling the story as they got older. The caller describes living in a small town in northern Canada and staying with friends whose father, a hunting guide, was out of town. One late night the caller and the friends drove into town for groceries. The caller says they began feeling [quote withheld] asked them to stop the car, and got out, saying they thought they were having a panic attack. The car began to move, and the caller says they found [name withheld], about 14 or 15, getting into the driver's seat. Because it was winter and snowing, the caller declined to ride back with [name withheld] driving and chose to walk. The friends said they would get money from the house and pick the caller up on the way back. The caller reports walking past widely spaced lit houses, then seeing headlights turn around a lake about a mile away, and deciding to hide and jump out as a joke. Standing on the roadside, the caller's vision went blurry, and as the car passed the caller thought they saw a hearse, [quote withheld] The caller then heard someone say their name quietly from behind them. The caller says they ran down onto the road, cried, and could not see where to go. Then the caller saw two white figures in the distance that the caller first took for a stop sign. They began moving toward the caller and yelling the caller's name, so the caller ran the other way, about half a mile, into town. At the edge of town, at a skating rink, the friends were driving in circles yelling the caller's name. The caller jumped in, told them what the caller had seen, and asked why they had turned back. The caller reports they looked scared and said they had suddenly felt something. They said to each other [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
Reported events, in order
- 0:44
While staying with friends in a small northern Canadian town, the caller drives into town with them late at night for groceries and begins feeling panicky and nervous.
- 1:05
They pull over, the caller gets out, and the car starts to move. The caller finds [name withheld], about 14 or 15, getting into the driver's seat.
- 1:17
Because it is winter and snowing, the caller declines to ride back with [name withheld] driving and chooses to walk. The friends say they will fetch money and come back for the caller.
- 1:46
Walking alone, the caller sees headlights turn around the lake about a mile away and decides to hide and surprise them as a joke.
- 2:04
Standing at the roadside giggling, the caller finds their vision goes blurry, and thinks they see a hearse, a big black car, go by.
- 2:15
The caller hears someone quietly say their name from behind them.
- 2:25
The caller runs down onto the road, is very scared, cries, and cannot see what to do.
- 2:35
The caller sees two white figures in the distance that the caller first takes for a stop sign. The figures begin moving toward the caller and yelling the caller's name.
- 2:56
The caller runs the other way, about half a mile into town, and finds the friends driving in circles at the skating rink yelling the caller's name. The caller jumps in, and they drive off.
- 3:08
The caller tells them what the caller saw and asks why they turned back. The caller says they told the caller they had suddenly felt something and said [quote withheld]
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 0:44
The caller felt sudden panic and nervousness while riding in the car at night.
- observation· 2:04
The caller's vision went blurry, and the caller thought they saw a hearse drive past instead of the friends' car.
- observation· 2:15
The caller heard a voice quietly speak their name from behind them.
- observation· 2:43
Two white figures in the distance began moving toward the caller and yelling the caller's name.
- interpretation· 3:08
The caller considered and rejected the idea that the name-calling was their friends.
- hearsay· 3:26
The caller's friends in the car reportedly felt something and said to each other that [name withheld] was in trouble, then turned back for the caller.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
Added up from components: source proximity 20 (firsthand, but partly blurred or uncertain), specificity 12 (concrete sequence and setting, but no town name or dates), internal consistency 13 (a coherent order, though it is left unclear whether the car the caller expected and the car the caller saw were the same), alternative explanations 7 (an ordinary explanation fits the voice and possibly the shapes), and calibration 12 (the caller flags uncertainty and raises the ordinary possibility themselves). No cap applies.
Evidence for and against
- A sustained, ordered story from a self-described direct witness.
- Concrete details of the situation: winter, snow, late night, groceries, lit houses far apart, about a mile, half a mile, a skating rink at the edge of town.
- The caller separates what they perceived from what they concluded and flags uncertainty: [quote withheld].
- No name of the town, street, or date. The setting is only [quote withheld].
- The caller reports blurred vision at the moment the vehicle passes, which weakens the claim about what the caller saw.
- The key visual claim rests on shapes seen at a distance that the caller first took for a stop sign.
- Parts of the story are reported after the fact from friends and cannot be checked.
- Whether the car the caller saw passing was the friends' car, another vehicle, or a misperception is left open by the caller.
- The era is worked out from the caller's stated age (35 at the time of the call) and school stage, not stated directly.
- 0:27
- 2:04
- 3:08
- 2:28
What the model inferred (not said on air): The weighting of the components, and the deduction for an easy ordinary explanation of the voice, are my own judgment. The transcript supplies the quoted detail above.
There is only the caller's own word. No physical evidence, documents, photographs, or recordings exist, and no second witness speaks on air. The friends' reported feeling is a claimed witness, not backing from someone else.
Evidence for and against
- A caller who gives their first name tells a sustained firsthand story.
- No details that can be checked, such as a town name, street, date, or records.
- No physical trace or media is claimed.
- The secondhand element (the friends' feeling) is reported only by the caller.
- None of the details given can be verified from the transcript.
- 3:26
- 0:27
What the model inferred (not said on air): It sits in the bottom range because the story rests on assertion alone. No outside check was done.
The story builds isolation, rising fear, and intrusion: a lone teenager on a snowy road at night, a name spoken quietly from behind, crying in confusion, then two white figures advancing while shouting the caller's name. It is sustained and unresolved, but it contains no threat, harm, or physical contact.
Evidence for and against
- The caller is alone at night after the car leaves.
- A name is spoken quietly from directly behind the caller.
- The caller reports crying and not knowing which way to run.
- Figures move toward the caller while calling their name.
- The encounter ends with the caller reaching their friends and driving away, with no injury.
- The caller's own thoughts that the shapes might have been a stop sign and that the voice might have been the friends reduce the sense of threat.
- The hearse detail is brief, and its role in the story is not developed.
- 2:18
- 2:30
- 2:43
What the model inferred (not said on air): The score is an entertainment judgment about the story in this transcript, not a claim about events.
The frame is familiar: a night road, a name called, figures in white. Two details stand out. A hearse appears where the friends' car was expected, and the friends report a shared sense that [name withheld] was in trouble.
Evidence for and against
- A hearse in place of the expected car.
- The friends reportedly felt something and turned back, saying [quote withheld]
- The main motifs (a lone witness at night, a name called, white figures on a road) are common in this genre.
- No unusual mechanism, object, or resolution is offered.
- The score compared with the rest of the archive is provisional for this pilot. The archive's weight in it is small, so the model's score dominates.
- 2:04
- 3:26
What the model inferred (not said on air): The model's own score from the story's content is 52. The published originality score would be recomputed compared with the rest of the archive.
Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.68 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story (live call); A claimed secondhand report of a shared feeling among the friends in the car, not spoken on air; No physical evidence, documentation, photograph, or recording. The originality score blends the model's score (52) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- The caller was already in a state of panic, which they name themselves, and they report blurred vision at the key moment. Panic, fast breathing, and nighttime viewing conditions can distort what a person sees and lead to a passing vehicle being misidentified. · [quote withheld]; [quote withheld]
- The voice calling the caller's name could have been the friends shouting while searching for them. The caller raises this themselves and says it did not match what they heard. · [quote withheld]; the friends were in the car yelling the caller's name in town.
- The two white shapes may have been objects or people in the snow that the caller misread. The caller's own first reading was an inanimate object. · [quote withheld]
What stands out
The story turns on a moment of substitution: the car the caller expected to see passes as what the caller takes to be a hearse. It also turns on a claimed shared feeling among the friends still driving, which the caller reports only after their own encounter. The caller also offers the ordinary possibility that they heard their friends calling them, and says it did not fit what they heard.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.