Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
date unknown·Caller's story·3 min·at 32:30 in the broadcast

Army recovery hospital house, a watched feeling, and a nurse figure at a kitchen window

A caller the host introduces as [name withheld] from Nebraska describes the house they lived in at about age 9 or 10, which they say they were told had been an Army recovery hospital. They report a recurring feeling of being watched. They pass on a secondhand report that their brothers saw bandaged people in the basement. They also describe a Saturday-morning sighting of a woman in nurse’s clothing crossing a kitchen window at sunrise, after which they found no one there. They end by saying they believe the house was somewhat haunted and that every house they have lived in had activity.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.70
How it was toldMixed · Live call
0:00 / 2:57
Play
0:12 · The caller says they were about 9 or 10 and lived in a house they were told had been an Army recovery hospital.0:28 · They report that their brothers remember seeing people all bandaged up in the basement reaching out as if asking for help.0:54 · They describe always having a feeling of being watched, including from the darkness of a room off the center room that contained the bathroom.1:29 · The host says such events cluster where there was great suffering and something lingers. The caller agrees.1:37 · On a Saturday morning, while watching cartoons with their younger brother, they glance into the kitchen, whose doorway faces a window.2:07 · They see a woman in nurse’s garb cross in front of the window, visible only because she blocked the sunrise light.2:18 · They go into the kitchen and find nobody there.2:26 · They say whatever it was had to have substance. They say they believe the house was somewhat haunted and every house they have lived in had activity.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2006.mp3”, starting at 32:30). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The host brings on a caller he calls “[name withheld]” and places in Nebraska. The caller says the story they had been telling “[name withheld]” concerns the house they lived in when they were [quote withheld] The caller was told when younger that it had been an Army recovery hospital. They report that their brothers remember seeing, when they were younger, people “all bandaged up” in the basement reaching out as if to ask for help. They note the house no longer exists and say they would have liked to go through it now. They say they always remembered a feeling of being watched. They describe a center room and a room off to the right or east that also contained the bathroom, and they felt something was looking at them from the darkness. The host comments that EVP events cluster at prisons, hospitals, graveyards, and mental wards, [quote withheld] The caller answers “Exactly.” The caller then describes one Saturday morning when they and their younger brother were watching Saturday-morning cartoons. They glanced into the kitchen, whose doorway faced a window to the outside, the sun having just come up, and saw a woman “in nurse's garb” cross in front of the window. They say they saw her only because she blocked the light. They went in and there was nobody there, and whatever it was [quote withheld] The caller says talking about it now still creeps them out. The caller believes the house was “somewhat haunted” and that every house they have lived in had some type of activity. Asked whether they think they bring the activity with them, they repeat that every house they have lived in has had activity. The excerpt ends there, mid-exchange.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:12

    The caller says they were about 9 or 10 and lived in a house they were told had been an Army recovery hospital.

  2. 0:28

    They report that their brothers remember seeing people all bandaged up in the basement reaching out as if asking for help.

  3. 0:54

    They describe always having a feeling of being watched, including from the darkness of a room off the center room that contained the bathroom.

  4. 1:29

    The host says such events cluster where there was great suffering and something lingers. The caller agrees.

  5. 1:37

    On a Saturday morning, while watching cartoons with their younger brother, they glance into the kitchen, whose doorway faces a window.

  6. 2:07

    They see a woman in nurse’s garb cross in front of the window, visible only because she blocked the sunrise light.

  7. 2:18

    They go into the kitchen and find nobody there.

  8. 2:26

    They say whatever it was had to have substance. They say they believe the house was somewhat haunted and every house they have lived in had activity.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:12

    The caller says the house they lived in at about age 9 or 10 had been an Army recovery hospital, as they were told when younger.

  • hearsay· 0:28

    They say their brothers remember seeing bandaged people in the basement reaching out as if asking for help.

  • observation· 0:40

    They report a long-remembered feeling of being watched in the house.

  • observation· 1:05

    They say they felt something looking at them from the darkness of the room containing the bathroom.

  • host statement· 1:29

    The host says such events cluster where there was great suffering and that something lingers.

  • observation· 2:09

    They say they saw a woman in nurse’s clothing cross in front of the kitchen window at sunrise.

  • observation· 2:18

    They say they went into the kitchen and there was nobody there.

  • interpretation· 2:26

    They say the figure had to have some type of substance.

  • interpretation· 2:26

    They say they believe the house was somewhat haunted.

  • interpretation· 2:52

    They say every house they have lived in has had some type of activity.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
54

This is a firsthand, coherent childhood story with some concrete detail (age, room layout, Saturday morning, sunrise, window). But the location is not identified beyond the state, the house no longer exists, and one element (the basement figures) is secondhand.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand telling of the sighting and of the recurring feeling of being watched.
  • Concrete layout and circumstances: living room, dining room, doorway into the kitchen, a window parallel to the doorway, sunrise.
  • The caller separates what they perceived from what they concluded, saying the caller “truly believe[s]” the house was “somewhat haunted.”
Against
  • No place, street, town, or date is given, and the house [quote withheld]
  • The basement figures are reported from the caller’s brothers. The caller did not see them personally.
  • Ordinary readings are available for the window sighting, which they saw only as a silhouette against sunrise light.
Uncertain or missing
  • The labels showing who is speaking swap between the caller and the caller within the call.
  • Several passages are transcribed as very short fragments, limiting detail.
  • The excerpt ends mid-exchange with the host’s question about activity following them.
Passages cited
  • 0:12
  • 2:09
  • 2:18
  • 2:26

What the model inferred (not said on air): I weighted source proximity as firsthand but brief, specifics as moderate, consistency as good, alternative explanations as partly available, and calibration as partial. The components add up to roughly the mid-50s, in line with the example for a clear firsthand story that no one else backs up.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

There is only the caller’s word, plus claimed witnesses who do not speak on air. No documents, photographs, or checkable records are offered, and the building is said to no longer exist.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Claimed witnesses: the brothers’ reported basement experience and the younger brother’s presence during the cartoons.
Against
  • No second witness speaks on air.
  • No physical evidence, photograph, recording, or record is described.
  • The caller says the house is gone and gives no identifying location beyond the state.
Uncertain or missing
  • The number of brothers is not stated.
  • It is not stated whether the younger brother saw the nurse figure.
Passages cited
  • 0:28
  • 1:37

What the model inferred (not said on air): Claimed witnesses who are not present place this in the 11 to 25 range. There is no examined material and no backing on air, so the score stays near the bottom of that range.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
52

The story combines a child’s persistent feeling of being watched from darkness, a report of bandaged figures reaching out in a basement, and a silent figure crossing a window. But there is no threat, escalation, or physical contact, and the telling stays conversational.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Bandaged people in the basement reaching out [quote withheld]
  • A child’s recurring sense of being watched, including from darkness.
  • A figure appearing in the kitchen window and then being gone when they go to look.
Against
  • No harm, pursuit, or hostility is reported.
  • The sighting is brief and is described plainly, without drama.
  • The caller notes the house no longer exists and speaks of wanting to revisit it out of curiosity.
Uncertain or missing
  • The passages about the feeling of being watched are fragmented across many short lines.
Passages cited
  • 0:28
  • 2:09
  • 2:18

What the model inferred (not said on air): The intrusion into a childhood home and the unresolved disappearance of the figure push this above mild eeriness. The lack of menace keeps it near the middle.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
53

Familiar ghost-story furniture is combined here: an old house with a hospital past, a nurse ghost, and a watched feeling. The distinctive details are a figure seen only as a silhouette against light and bandaged, help-seeking figures in a basement.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A specific detail: the figure was noticed only because she blocked the sunrise light through the kitchen window.
  • An unusual element: the basement figures are said to reach out as if asking for help.
Against
  • A “somewhat haunted” old house with a historical past is a stock frame.
  • A nurse figure in a former medical building and a [quote withheld] are common themes.
Uncertain or missing
  • The comparison with the rest of the archive is a first estimate, because few stories are archived so far.
Passages cited
  • 1:59
  • 2:26

What the model inferred (not said on air): I rate the model score around the mid-40s: a familiar frame carrying one or two distinctive details, not a wholly uncommon event.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story; A secondhand report of the brothers’ claimed experiences; A claimed second person (the younger brother) present during one event, who does not speak on air; No physical evidence, documents, or photographs offered. The originality score blends the model's score (45) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • The “nurse” seen at the window may have been a person outside, a reflection, or a figure produced by looking toward a bright window at sunrise. The caller says she was seen only because she blocked the light. · [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
  • The figures the brothers reportedly saw in the basement could relate to being told the building’s earlier use as an Army recovery hospital. That would make it expectation or suggestion, not something actually observed. · [quote withheld] followed by the basement story.
  • A felt presence or a sense of being watched in a dark room is a commonly reported sensation that can arise in low light without a visible source. · [quote withheld]

What stands out

The story ties a childhood home to a claimed past as a wartime hospital. The reported sighting is noticed only as a silhouette blocking sunrise light through a window, not as a figure seen directly. The caller also extends the claim beyond the house to every home they have lived in, which the host probes by asking whether they bring the activity with them.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.