Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
date unknown·Caller's story·6 min·at 46:48 in the broadcast

Glowing green clothed skeleton in Navy housing and a stepfather’s change

A caller the host addresses as [name withheld], calling from San Diego, describes an incident in Navy housing in 1971 (later said to be 1974). They say they saw a luminescent green, fully clothed skeleton with an evil grin inside their bedcovers while they were unable to move. They say they later learned the previous tenant, a man, had died driving home from hunting, matching the hunting cap and jacket they say the figure wore. They link the sighting to a lasting change for the worse in their stepfather’s personality. The host suggests that the figure inhabited the stepfather, and the caller says they believe so. The caller ends with a brief remark that their late mother visits them.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.80
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 5:39
Play
0:12 · The caller says their Navy stepfather was transferred from Los Angeles to San Diego in 1971, and the family rented a house in a nearby suburb before getting Navy housing about two and a half years later.0:35 · One evening, alone in the house, they say they saw a very bright green light coming from under their bedcovers.0:48 · They say they opened the covers and saw a fully clothed skeleton with a very evil grin, and that they could not move.1:03 · They say they told their mother and stepfather the next morning and that their stepfather dismissed the story.1:24 · They say the family later found out the previous occupants had had to move out.2:01 · They say they learned the man who had lived there died when his car went over a cliff while he was coming home from hunting.2:19 · They say the clothing on the figure, a hunting cap and a flak jacket, all green and luminescent, matched that story.3:01 · They say their stepfather’s attitude changed for the worse, he became hard to live with, and the parents ultimately divorced.3:57 · They say the stepfather once pinned them against the wall and asked whether they loved their mother or him more.4:17 · They say they heard their stepfather had passed away.4:32 · They say their mother died two years ago to the day and visits them often.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2006.mp3”, starting at 46:48). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, whom the host addresses as [name withheld] and takes to be calling from San Diego, says their story began in 1971. Their Navy stepfather was transferred from Los Angeles to San Diego, and the family rented a house in a nearby suburb. About two and a half years later they were finally assigned Navy housing. They say that one evening, while everyone else was away, they saw a very bright green light coming from under their bedcovers. Opening the covers, they say, they saw a fully clothed skeleton with a very evil grin. They say they were petrified and could not move. They told their mother and stepfather the next morning, and say their stepfather dismissed the story. They say they later found out the previous family had had to move out, and that the man who had lived there had died. They say the man was driving home from hunting when his car went over a cliff. They note that the clothing they saw on the skeleton, a hunting cap and what they call a flak jacket, all green and luminescent, matched that story. Asked by the host whether it could have been a dream, they say none whatsoever, that it was vivid and they were fully awake. They say what frightened them most was a change for the worse in their stepfather, who had been happy-go-lucky. The stepfather became hard to live with and once pinned them against the wall, asking whether they loved their mother or him more. They say their parents ultimately divorced and that they later heard their stepfather had passed away. When the host suggests that whatever it was began to inhabit their father, they answer “I believe so.” They add that their mother died two years ago to the day and visits them often.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:12

    The caller says their Navy stepfather was transferred from Los Angeles to San Diego in 1971, and the family rented a house in a nearby suburb before getting Navy housing about two and a half years later.

  2. 0:35

    One evening, alone in the house, they say they saw a very bright green light coming from under their bedcovers.

  3. 0:48

    They say they opened the covers and saw a fully clothed skeleton with a very evil grin, and that they could not move.

  4. 1:03

    They say they told their mother and stepfather the next morning and that their stepfather dismissed the story.

  5. 1:24

    They say the family later found out the previous occupants had had to move out.

  6. 2:01

    They say they learned the man who had lived there died when his car went over a cliff while he was coming home from hunting.

  7. 2:19

    They say the clothing on the figure, a hunting cap and a flak jacket, all green and luminescent, matched that story.

  8. 3:01

    They say their stepfather’s attitude changed for the worse, he became hard to live with, and the parents ultimately divorced.

  9. 3:57

    They say the stepfather once pinned them against the wall and asked whether they loved their mother or him more.

  10. 4:17

    They say they heard their stepfather had passed away.

  11. 4:32

    They say their mother died two years ago to the day and visits them often.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:35

    A bright green light appeared under their bedcovers one evening.

  • observation· 0:48

    They saw a fully clothed skeleton with an evil grin and could not move.

  • observation· 1:39

    The figure appeared only to them and was not seen by others.

  • hearsay· 1:45

    They learned the previous family had had to move out of the house.

  • hearsay· 2:01

    They learned the previous tenant died when his car went over a cliff while coming home from hunting.

  • interpretation· 2:19

    The hunting cap and green jacket they saw matched the story of the dead man.

  • observation· 3:01

    Their stepfather’s personality changed for the worse after the sighting.

  • interpretation· 3:27

    They link the evil figure they saw to their stepfather’s change in behavior.

  • interpretation· 3:44

    They agree with the host’s suggestion that the being began to inhabit their stepfather.

  • observation· 4:32

    They say their late mother visits them often.

  • host statement· 5:16

    The host says the being from the skeleton inhabited the caller’s stepfather.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
58

This is a firsthand, reasonably detailed story. But it carries a contradiction in dates, and an ordinary explanation (a bedroom episode on waking) fits easily, so it lands just above a typical brief firsthand story.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A firsthand witness story.
  • Detail from the senses and the clothing: green light, hunting cap, flak jacket.
  • The caller separates what they perceived from what they concluded ([quote withheld]).
Against
  • They say the story happened in 1971 but also that they were 11 in 1974.
  • The “investigation” reasoning about Navy dependents is confused.
  • They deny a dream only in response to the host, offering no other check.
Uncertain or missing
  • The dates are contradictory (1971 versus 1974), and the housing timeline is muddled.
  • The caller’s name and city are partly the host’s doing.
Passages cited
  • 0:12
  • 1:39
  • 2:47

What the model inferred (not said on air): The deductions for consistency come from the conflicting dates. The low alternative-explanation score reflects that a bedroom, being unable to move, and a waking state fit explanations tied to sleep easily, which the caller does not address beyond denying a dream.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

The story rests on the caller’s word alone, with some specifics that could in principle be checked (a previous tenant’s death, the clothing match) but were not, and no second witness on air.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Concrete details given: Navy housing, a previous occupant, a hunting accident, a car over a cliff.
Against
  • No document, record, photograph, or independent witness is produced.
  • The “investigation” that backs it up is itself only reported, not examined.
Uncertain or missing
  • The “investigation” is only reported by the caller. No record or document is presented.
  • The caller’s name is the host’s guess ([quote withheld]).
Passages cited
  • 1:45

What the model inferred (not said on air): The “checkable” details (a death, a hunting accident, a car over a cliff) could in principle be verified, but they are not verified here and come secondhand from an unnamed investigation.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
68

A glowing figure with an evil grin appearing in a child’s bed, combined with being unable to move and a later story of the stepfather pinning them against a wall, is markedly unsettling.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Intrusion into the caller’s own bed and covers.
  • The caller says they were petrified and could not move.
  • The stepfather is said to pin them against the wall and question them.
Against
  • The caller’s closing remarks about their mother visiting them are warm and matter-of-fact.
Uncertain or missing
  • The detail of violence at home is brief, and its timing relative to the ghost is not fixed.
Passages cited
  • 0:48
  • 0:54
  • 3:57

What the model inferred (not said on air): The child-in-bed setting, the inability to move, and the escalation into a threat at home carry the unease. The story is told plainly, without dramatic staging.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
64

A bedroom ghost and a frame where a previous occupant died are stock. But the luminous green skeleton dressed in hunting gear, seen inside the caller’s own covers, is an unusual combination.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Green light said to come from under the covers.
  • Clothing described as a hunting cap and flak jacket, all green and luminescent.
Against
  • Uses recurring themes: a bedroom visitor, being unable to move, a previous occupant who died, and later research that matches.
Uncertain or missing
  • The archive is still small, so the comparison with the rest of it carries little weight, and the score is a first estimate.
  • No source is stated for the luminescent green color or the skeleton form.
Passages cited
  • 0:48
  • 2:19

What the model inferred (not said on air): The bedcovers as a container and the match between clothing and death are the distinctive elements. The surrounding frame (a previous occupant died, later confirmation) is familiar.

Scoring confidence 0.65 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story; The caller’s reported secondhand “investigation” of the previous tenant’s death (not examined); No photograph, recording, document, or second witness on air. The originality score blends the model's score (68) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • An episode tied to sleep (the kind that occurs while falling asleep, or sleep paralysis) in bed, which would account for being unable to move and the figure seen on waking. · The caller says they were in bed under the covers, were petrified and “couldn't move.” The host asks directly whether they were sleeping. The caller denies it was a dream but does not address other explanations tied to sleep.
  • The stepfather’s personality change and the divorce had ordinary domestic causes (marital conflict, stress), unrelated to the reported sighting. · The caller says the parents “ultimately did divorce” and describes the change as an “attitude change.” The link to the ghost is only the caller’s own guess.

What stands out

A luminescent green, fully clothed skeleton in a hunting cap and flak jacket is said to appear inside the caller’s own bedcovers. The clothing is later matched to a man who died driving home from a hunt. The story ties a single bedroom ghost to a claimed personality change in the stepfather.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.