Archaeology crew's equipment failures and scattered camp at a burial site
A caller who gives their name as [name withheld], from Southern California, says they are an archaeologist with a master's degree. They describe a survey and excavation where laptops and generators failed inside a flagged area and camp equipment was found scattered. They report that human remains were uncovered. An elder's spiritualist prescribed a sweat lodge and colored cloth ribbons. Crew members who took part reported nothing further, while those who did not said the disturbances started again.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2007.mp3”, starting at 33:32). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
[name withheld], who gives their name and says they are calling from Southern California, states that they are an archaeologist with a master's degree, not a Ph.D. [name withheld] says that while working on a survey crew they found an area with a lot of broken pottery, flagged it, and came back a couple of days later to excavate. [name withheld] reports what they call equipment failure. Laptops would go dead inside the area and come back on when taken out, and generators behaved the same way for lights. [name withheld] says a base camp was set up with a cook. The first night, personal equipment was found in trees and scattered all over the place, and they thought it might have been animals. On the second night, [name withheld] says, the cook came out the next morning angry because everything around the cook area was scattered. When they started excavating, [name withheld] says, they began finding human remains, which brought a Native American monitor to the area. This went on for almost a week. Asked whether digging in such areas is prohibited, [name withheld] says it depends on the purpose. [name withheld] describes a fiber-optic route going through the center of the valley that could not be rerouted. [name withheld] says they finally got hold of one of the elders, who brought in a spiritualist, [quote withheld] who offered to let them come into a sweat lodge, sweat out, and do incantations. Each person was then given a piece of ribbon or colored cloth to carry and to tie onto their tent. [name withheld] says that those who went had nothing happen, while those who did not had everything happen over again. The host closes by saying he would not go digging in such an area.
Reported events, in order
- 0:20
[name withheld] introduces themselves as an archaeologist with a master's degree, not a Ph.D.
- 0:30
Their survey crew found an area with a lot of broken pottery, flagged it, and returned a couple of days later to excavate.
- 0:43
[name withheld] reports equipment failure. Laptops went dead inside the area and came back on outside it, and generators behaved the same way for lights.
- 1:08
A base camp with a cook was set up near the excavation.
- 1:17
On the first night, personal equipment was found in trees and scattered around. The crew thought animals might be responsible.
- 1:25
On the second night, the cook found everything around the cook area scattered.
- 1:34
Excavation uncovered human remains, and a Native American monitor was brought in to monitor the area.
- 1:43
The disturbances continued for almost a week.
- 2:23
They contacted an elder, who brought in a spiritualist who offered a sweat lodge and incantations.
- 2:40
Each person was given a piece of ribbon or colored cloth to carry and to tie onto their tent.
- 2:50
Those who took part reported nothing further happening. Those who did not said everything happened over again.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 0:45
Laptops carried into the flagged excavation area went dead and came back on when taken out of it.
- observation· 0:50
Generators behaved the same way as the laptops with respect to the lights.
- host statement· 1:00
The host describes the equipment failures as something temporarily taking energy from what the crew brought in.
- observation· 1:17
On the first night, personal equipment was found in trees and scattered around the camp.
- observation· 1:30
On the second night, everything around the cook area was scattered.
- observation· 1:34
Excavation uncovered human remains at the site.
- host statement· 1:52
The host states that archaeologists and others are usually prohibited from digging in such areas.
- observation· 2:23
An elder brought in a spiritualist, described by [name withheld] as not a shaman, who prescribed a sweat lodge and incantations.
- observation· 2:46
Each person was told to carry one piece of ribbon or colored cloth and tie one piece onto their tent.
- observation· 2:53
Those who went through the ritual had nothing happen, while those who did not said everything happened over again.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
The caller is a claimed direct participant with a professional role and gives an ordered sequence. But they supply no location, date, names, or verifiable specifics. The first part of the story (equipment failure, scattered gear) has ordinary explanations that they partly acknowledge themselves.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand claim as a member of the survey crew ([quote withheld]).
- A coherent, ordered sequence: find and flag the site, excavate, equipment failure, two nights of scattered gear, human remains found, ritual, differing outcomes.
- [name withheld] answers the host's questions about digging restrictions and the route of the work.
- No place, date, crew size, agency, or any detail that could be checked.
- The caller raises an ordinary possibility for the scattered gear themselves ([quote withheld]).
- The ritual outcome is a self-reported comparison with no stated record of who took part or what was observed.
- Several lines are labeled as the host, or as possibly the host, although the content appears to belong to the caller, so the exact wording of parts of the story is uncertain.
- The order of the two nights of scattering is partly carried by mislabeled lines.
- 0:30
- 1:17
- 2:50
What the model inferred (not said on air): The component scores are an editorial judgment: source proximity about 21 (claimed firsthand but brief and from memory), specificity about 8 (sequence and objects but no checkable details), internal consistency about 14 (coherent, with some lines mislabeled), alternative explanations about 9 (ordinary readings fit the equipment and scattering portions), calibration about 8 (they flag the animal possibility and do not themselves assert a cause).
The story rests entirely on the caller's word. No location, date, record, photograph, recording, or named second witness is offered, and the claimed crew members do not speak on air.
Evidence for and against
- A claimed professional role and a claimed multi-person crew.
- A stated test of behavior after the ritual ([quote withheld]).
- No documentation of any kind is said to exist.
- No checkable specifics (names, dates, places, employers, site numbers) are given.
- The claimed other witnesses are unnamed and silent on air.
- It is not stated whether the caller reported numbers of participants or saw the outcomes directly.
- 0:20
- 2:53
What the model inferred (not said on air): I place this in the score of 0 to 10 band because the only support is the caller's own word, with no claimed documentation and no second witness on air.
The story is more unsettling than frightening: dead electronics at a remote work site, gear found up in trees, and the discovery of human remains, followed by a ritual remedy. No one is threatened or harmed, and no hostile presence is described.
Evidence for and against
- Equipment repeatedly failing and reviving around a specific area.
- Personal gear found in trees and camp contents scattered on successive nights.
- Excavation uncovering human remains, with activity continuing almost a week.
- No physical contact, injury, or direct threat to any person is reported.
- No figure or presence is described.
- The story ends on a comparison of outcomes, not an ominous image.
- The story is brief and many setting details are missing, which limits how vividly the events come across.
- 1:17
- 1:43
What the model inferred (not said on air): This rating reflects the intrusion of the unexplained into a working camp and the burial-site setting, without any threat or harm.
A burial-site disturbance resolved by ritual is a familiar setup. But the setting of a professional archaeological survey, and the detail of laptops dying inside an area and reviving when carried out, give it a distinctive edge. The score compared with the rest of the archive is provisional in this pilot.
Evidence for and against
- Electronic failure tied to a location, tracked by carrying equipment in and out of the flagged area.
- A ritual remedy involving a sweat lodge, incantations, and cloth ribbons tied to tents.
- An outcome framed as a comparison between those who took part and those who did not.
- Burial-ground disturbance is a stock ghost-story premise.
- Interference with equipment and objects being moved or scattered are common motifs.
- Novelty compared with the rest of the archive cannot be judged here. This score is based on content alone and is provisional.
- 0:45
- 2:46
What the model inferred (not said on air): I judged the combination of a scientific excavation, equipment that fails in and out of an area, and a prescribed ritual remedy as a familiar setup with distinctive specifics, around the middle of the scale.
Scoring confidence 0.62 · analysis confidence 0.68 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story.; Claimed participation of a crew, a cook, and a Native American monitor (none speak on air).; No photograph, recording, or document claimed.. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- Electronic equipment failure from drained batteries, cold, moisture, or faulty generators in a remote field camp. · [name withheld] reports laptops going dead inside an area and coming back on outside it, and generators behaving the same way for lights.
- Animals scattering camp equipment, a possibility the caller themselves raises. · [name withheld] says personal equipment was found in trees and scattered, [quote withheld]
- Expectation and self-report after the discovery of remains and the ritual. Outcomes were not recorded or observed under controlled conditions and appear to be reported by participants themselves. · The comparison is stated in the form [quote withheld]
What stands out
The strange events are tied to a professional archaeological excavation, not a home or public building. The story ends with the caller's own comparison between crew members who took part in a prescribed ritual and those who did not. The caller does not name a cause for the events.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.