Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2007 (possible)·Caller's story·2 min·at 2:18:24 in the broadcast

Bluish-white pillar becoming a woman’s ghost on a rural road at night

A caller who identifies himself as [name withheld] from Arizona tells Art Bell that as a boy of about nine or ten he was on a picnic at a country lake with his mother and grandmother. Driving home after dark, his grandmother took a wrong turn down a long dirt road. There the three of them saw a bluish-white glowing pillar that became a woman’s ghost drifting toward the car, and they fled.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.60
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 1:43
Play
0:13 · [name withheld] says that at about nine or ten years old he went with his mother and grandmother on a picnic in the country to a lake.0:26 · As it was getting dark, they decided to leave.0:31 · His grandmother took a wrong turn without realizing it, and they drove a long way down a dirt road before she realized.0:37 · They pulled up to a driveway. By this time it was night.0:52 · They noticed a glowing pillar off the side of the road, described as bluish-white.1:11 · As they drove closer, his mother began screaming and beating her hands on the dashboard.1:15 · He says they could see it was a ghost of a woman that was drifting toward the car.1:24 · They got out of there.1:29 · He confirms to Art Bell that he also saw it and that all three of them saw it.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2007.mp3”, starting at 2:18:24). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

[name withheld], calling from Arizona, says that when he was [quote withheld] his mother, his grandmother, and he went on a picnic out in the country to a lake. As it was getting dark, they decided to leave, and his grandmother took a wrong turn without realizing it. He says they traveled a long way down a dirt road before his grandmother realized she had gone the wrong way, and they pulled up to a driveway. By then it was night. Off the side of the road they noticed a glowing pillar, which he describes as [quote withheld] He says that as they drove closer to it, his mother began screaming and beating her hands on the dashboard. They could see it was [quote withheld] that was drifting toward the car. He says they got out of there. In answer to Art Bell’s questions, he confirms he also saw it, that it was [quote withheld] and that all three of them saw it. The call ends with the host thanking him and moving to the next caller. No explanation, follow-up, or later outcome is given.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:13

    [name withheld] says that at about nine or ten years old he went with his mother and grandmother on a picnic in the country to a lake.

  2. 0:26

    As it was getting dark, they decided to leave.

  3. 0:31

    His grandmother took a wrong turn without realizing it, and they drove a long way down a dirt road before she realized.

  4. 0:37

    They pulled up to a driveway. By this time it was night.

  5. 0:52

    They noticed a glowing pillar off the side of the road, described as bluish-white.

  6. 1:11

    As they drove closer, his mother began screaming and beating her hands on the dashboard.

  7. 1:15

    He says they could see it was a ghost of a woman that was drifting toward the car.

  8. 1:24

    They got out of there.

  9. 1:29

    He confirms to Art Bell that he also saw it and that all three of them saw it.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:52

    [name withheld] says the family noticed a glowing pillar off the side of the road.

  • observation· 0:57

    He describes the pillar as bluish-white in color.

  • observation· 1:11

    He says his mother screamed and beat her hands on the dashboard as they drove closer.

  • interpretation· 1:15

    He says they could see the pillar was a ghost of a woman.

  • observation· 1:20

    He says the ghost was drifting toward the car.

  • observation· 1:29

    He answers that he too saw it and that it was a ghost of a woman.

  • host statement· 1:35

    The host states that all three of them saw it, which the caller affirms.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
54

This is a brief but consistent firsthand story from a witness who was present, with a few concrete sensory details. It lacks names, dates, and any checkable specifics, and the situation has straightforward low-light explanations that the caller does not address.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand witness present in the car.
  • Coherent sequence: picnic, departure, wrong turn, dirt road, driveway, sighting, flight.
  • Concrete detail: [quote withheld]
  • Concrete detail of reaction: mother beating hands on the dashboard.
Against
  • No lake, road, state, or year named. Age given only roughly ([quote withheld]).
  • The caller presents the conclusion [quote withheld] without describing how it was told apart from a person or a light.
  • The host asks no probing follow-up questions.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller was a child at the time and is recalling an event from decades ago with no stated date.
  • Some lines are fragmentary and split across timestamps, so details of the sequence may be lost.
Passages cited
  • 0:13
  • 0:57
  • 1:15

What the model inferred (not said on air): Closeness to the source is set low to middle within the firsthand range because the experience is brief and the caller was a young child. Alternative explanations are scored low because a light or figure on a dark, unfamiliar road fits easily and the caller does not consider it.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

Only the caller’s word, plus claimed witnesses who do not speak on air. No physical evidence, records, or checkable specifics are offered.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Multiple witnesses claimed ([quote withheld]).
  • A specific type of location and a sequence are given (dirt road, driveway).
Against
  • No photograph, recording, or document mentioned.
  • No names, dates, or locations that could be checked.
  • The mother and grandmother never speak on air.
Uncertain or missing
  • Who said the line [quote withheld] is uncertain.
Passages cited
  • 1:35
  • 1:29

What the model inferred (not said on air): Claimed witnesses place this in the 11 to 25 range rather than the 0 to 10 range for the caller alone. Nothing in the transcript reaches the range for physical evidence.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
52

A nighttime roadside encounter with a glowing form that turns into a woman moving toward the car, with the mother’s panic as the strongest emotional signal. It is brief and unresolved rather than sustained or physically threatening.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Nighttime setting on an unfamiliar rural road.
  • Mother screaming and striking the dashboard.
  • The ghost reportedly drifting toward the car.
Against
  • No physical contact, harm, or threat reported.
  • No sustained escalation. The family simply drives away.
  • No description of the woman’s appearance or expression.
Uncertain or missing
  • The story ends abruptly with the host moving on, so nothing is said about after-effects.
Passages cited
  • 1:11
  • 1:20

What the model inferred (not said on air): Creepiness is rated on the story’s content for a listener, not on the caller’s delivery, which under the scoring guide is not evidence.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
53

A female ghost seen from a car on a roadside at night is a familiar setup. But the reported change from an upright bluish-white light into a figure is a distinctive detail.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Change of a shapeless glowing pillar into a woman.
Against
  • A wrong turn onto a rural road and a woman ghost are stock ghost-story elements.
  • No unusual aftermath, communication, or recurring element.
Uncertain or missing
  • The ghost is described in only two fragmentary lines, so its distinctive features may be under-recorded.
Passages cited
  • 0:52
  • 1:16
  • 1:21

What the model inferred (not said on air): Scored provisionally from content. The comparison with the rest of the archive is not meaningful for a single story and carries little weight in the pilot.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.65 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story; Claimed witnesses (mother, grandmother) who do not speak on air. The originality score blends the model's score (50) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Vehicle or other artificial lights seen across dark rural ground could be seen as a glowing column standing off the roadside. · The sighting begins as a shapeless “bluish-white pillar” at night on an unfamiliar dirt road.
  • A living person, for example someone walking near a driveway at night, could be seen in poor light and taken for a drifting figure. · They had stopped at a driveway off the road, and the figure is described only as [quote withheld]
  • Low light, unfamiliar surroundings, and the alarm of other passengers could turn a vague shape into a human form. · The story is set at night after a wrong turn, with the mother shouting before the figure is described.

What stands out

The reported sequence moves from a shapeless glowing column to a recognizable female figure, rather than a figure being seen first. The caller does not describe her clothing, face, or whether she was solid or transparent, so the ghost remains defined mainly by the light it came from.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.