Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2007 (possible)·Letter read on air·2 min·at 1:35:33 in the broadcast

Noose reported suspended from nothing in a rented former church rectory

A letter read on air, credited by the host to [name withheld] in Alberta, Canada, describes a family that rented a small-town house beside a church and graveyard in the mid-1990s. They decorated it for Halloween with headstones and a hangman's noose. The writer says a scream from downstairs woke them after midnight, and that the writer and their 11-year-old daughter saw a hangman's noose suspended from seemingly nothing on the stairs, which then fell. The writer says they learned the next day that the house had been the old church rectory and that a former pastor of the neighboring church had hanged himself there.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.65
How it was toldFirsthand · Letter read on air
0:00 / 1:41
Play
0:02 · In the mid-1990s the family sold their rural home and moved to a small town of about 6,000 people.0:09 · They rented a house beside a small church and graveyard in the center of town.0:16 · They moved in one week before Halloween.0:22 · The four children decorated the house and yard with headstones and a hangman's noose hung from a large willow tree beside the front door, along with a realistic dead-man figure.0:41 · No trick-or-treaters came to their door on Halloween Eve, although they saw dozens going door to door across the street.0:53 · After midnight they were awakened by a scream from downstairs.1:00 · The writer found their 11-year-old daughter trembling and staring upward at the stairs.1:05 · The writer saw a hangman's noose suspended from seemingly nothing.1:14 · The noose hung for a few seconds and then fell onto the stairs. No one slept that night.1:29 · The next day the writer learned the family was living in the old church rectory, where a former pastor of the neighboring church had hanged himself.1:37 · The host credits the letter to [name withheld] in Alberta, Canada.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2007.mp3”, starting at 1:35:33). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The host reads a letter he credits to [quote withheld] The writer says that in the mid-1990s their family sold their rural home and moved to a small town of about 6,000 people. They rented [quote withheld] They moved in one week before Halloween. The writer's four children decorated the house and yard with headstones and a hangman's noose hanging from a large willow tree beside the front door, along with [quote withheld] The family bought treats, but on Halloween Eve no children came to their door, even though they watched dozens going door to door across the street. The writer says they felt “very rejected.” They went to bed around midnight and were awakened by [quote withheld] The writer says they rushed to the stairs and found their 11-year-old daughter trembling and staring upward. The writer says they looked up and saw [quote withheld] According to the letter, it hung there for a few seconds and then fell onto the stairs, frightening everyone. No one slept that night. The next day, the writer says, they learned what others apparently already knew: the family had been living in the old church rectory, and a former pastor of the neighboring church had hanged himself there. The letter does not state a cause for the sighting. The host's closing remarks about suicides and the afterlife follow as comment.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:02

    In the mid-1990s the family sold their rural home and moved to a small town of about 6,000 people.

  2. 0:09

    They rented a house beside a small church and graveyard in the center of town.

  3. 0:16

    They moved in one week before Halloween.

  4. 0:22

    The four children decorated the house and yard with headstones and a hangman's noose hung from a large willow tree beside the front door, along with a realistic dead-man figure.

  5. 0:41

    No trick-or-treaters came to their door on Halloween Eve, although they saw dozens going door to door across the street.

  6. 0:53

    After midnight they were awakened by a scream from downstairs.

  7. 1:00

    The writer found their 11-year-old daughter trembling and staring upward at the stairs.

  8. 1:05

    The writer saw a hangman's noose suspended from seemingly nothing.

  9. 1:14

    The noose hung for a few seconds and then fell onto the stairs. No one slept that night.

  10. 1:29

    The next day the writer learned the family was living in the old church rectory, where a former pastor of the neighboring church had hanged himself.

  11. 1:37

    The host credits the letter to [name withheld] in Alberta, Canada.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:41

    No trick-or-treaters came to their door, although the family saw dozens going door to door across the street.

  • observation· 0:53

    The household was awakened after midnight by a scream from downstairs.

  • observation· 1:00

    The writer found their 11-year-old daughter trembling and staring upward on the stairs.

  • observation· 1:05

    The writer says they saw a hangman's noose hanging with no visible support on the stairs.

  • observation· 1:14

    The noose stayed for a few seconds and then fell onto the stairs.

  • hearsay· 1:29

    The writer says they learned the next day that the house was the old church rectory and that a former pastor of the neighboring church had hanged himself there.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
62

This is a short firsthand story that hangs together, with concrete scene details. But it has no names or dates, and it does not deal with obvious ordinary possibilities such as a prank involving the family's own Halloween noose. It is scored in the middle of the scoring guide.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The writer presents the experience as their own ([quote withheld]).
  • The setting details are concrete: a town of about 6,000, a house beside a church and graveyard, moving in a week before Halloween, an 11-year-old daughter.
  • The letter separates what was seen ([quote withheld]) from what was learned later about the rectory.
Against
  • No names, dates, address, or records are given, so nothing can be checked from the transcript.
  • A decorative noose was already hanging on the property, which makes a prank or a mistaken identification of the object easy to imagine. The letter does not discuss this.
  • The writer offers no explicit cause and no reasoning about what the object was.
Uncertain or missing
  • The labels showing who is speaking are automatic. The letter lines are labeled as the host, and one greeting line is also labeled as the host, so who said individual lines is uncertain.
  • No names or dates are given that would allow cross-checking within the letter.
Passages cited
  • 0:02
  • 0:22
  • 1:29

What the model inferred (not said on air): Reasoning by component: closeness to the source 18 (firsthand, but presented as a letter read aloud and not questioned in detail); specificity 12 (era, town size, house setting, daughter's age, sequence, but no names, dates, or address); consistency 16 (the sequence hangs together and the answers implied in the letter fit); alternative explanations 6 (a Halloween prank using the family's own noose decoration, or a child's fright, fit the setting easily and are not addressed); calibration 10 (the writer reports what was seen and what was learned without asserting a cause). Sum 62.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

The story rests entirely on the letter writer's word, with a second witness claimed but not speaking. One claim, that a former pastor hanged himself in the rectory, could in principle be checked in local records. But nothing was checked, and no document, photograph, or recording is claimed to exist.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A second person (the 11-year-old daughter) is said to have seen the noose.
  • The rectory and pastor claim is the kind of detail that could in principle be verified locally.
Against
  • No names, town, dates, or records are offered.
  • No photograph, recording, or physical trace is claimed.
  • The claimed second witness does not speak on air.
Uncertain or missing
  • It is not stated whether the writer's story was ever checked against local records or news of the pastor's death.
  • The second claimed witness (the daughter) does not speak on air.
  • No town, names, or dates are given that could be looked up as written.
Passages cited
  • 1:37
  • 1:00

What the model inferred (not said on air): The range of 11 to 25 is used because a second witness is claimed and one historical fact (a pastor's suicide at that address) could in principle be checked, though nothing is checked and no physical evidence is claimed. No outside check was performed, so the cap of 50 does not apply here.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
60

A screaming child, a noose hanging from nothing in a family home at midnight, and a closing revelation of a suicide on the property give the story a truly unsettling shape. But it is short and ends without escalation or threat.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The event happens at night inside the family's home, waking them from sleep.
  • An 11-year-old child is the one who screams and stares.
  • The story closes by linking the house to a hanging death.
Against
  • No harm, contact, or ongoing activity is reported.
  • The object is not described as alive or menacing, and it falls and is not seen again.
Uncertain or missing
  • The transcript does not describe the daughter's later account or how long the household stayed disturbed.
  • The child's own reaction is reported only in the writer's words.
Passages cited
  • 0:53
  • 1:14

What the model inferred (not said on air): The elements that raise the score are something intruding on the home at night, a child as the first witness, an unexplained object, and the closing revelation of a suicide on the premises. It is not raised further because the story is brief, the object is not described as threatening, and nothing is reported to follow the family afterward.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
57

This is a familiar [quote withheld] setup with one unusual detail: an object, not a figure, appears suspended from nothing, echoing the family's own Halloween decoration. It is rated provisionally around the middle of the scale.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A noose that appears is an uncommon form of manifestation compared with figures, footsteps, or cold spots.
  • The tie between the family's own decorative noose and the reported indoor noose is a distinctive combination.
Against
  • A rented home, a previous occupant's suicide, and an event on Halloween are recurring ghost-story elements.
  • The [quote withheld] ending is a common way to close a story.
Uncertain or missing
  • The part of the score that compares it with the rest of the archive depends on comparisons not available here, so only the provisional model score is given.
  • There is only one reported incident, so there is little variation to weigh.
Passages cited
  • 1:05
  • 0:29

What the model inferred (not said on air): The haunted-house setup (family moves in, learns of a death) is stock. The distinctive element is that what appears is the same kind of Halloween prop the family used, showing up indoors with no support. The score is weighted toward the middle of the model scale, and the final value compared with the rest of the archive is to be computed automatically.

Scoring confidence 0.65 · analysis confidence 0.72 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The writer's firsthand story, presented as a letter read on air by the host.; A claimed second witness (the writer's 11-year-old daughter) who does not speak on air.; An unverified claim about the building's history (a former pastor's suicide).. The originality score blends the model's score (60) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • The reported noose was a prank or a staged effect using the family's own Halloween noose decoration, which was already hanging outside the front door. · including headstones on the lawn and a hangman's noose, which was suspended from a large willow tree beside the front door
  • A child waking in a dark house on Halloween, after the household had spent days on a hanging-themed display, could scream at a misread or imagined shape on the stairs. · only to be awakened by a blood-curdling scream coming from downstairs
  • Low light at midnight and the Halloween setting could lead to an ordinary object or shadow on the staircase being misread. · I glanced up to see a hangman's noose suspended from seemingly nothing

What stands out

The reported event involves an object, a hangman's noose, rather than a figure or a sound. It is said to have hung “from seemingly nothing” inside a house where the family had themselves hung a decorative noose outside for Halloween. The letter ends by tying the sighting to a previous occupant's suicide, a detail the writer says they learned only the next day.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.