Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2007 (possible)·Caller's story·4 min·at 49:48 in the broadcast

Ouija board threat, a voice in the ear, and a man in the passenger seat

A caller named [name withheld], calling from Los Angeles, tells of a Ouija board session years earlier. The caller and a friend contacted what they call an evil spirit that threatened to kill the friend. Walking away from the friend's apartment at about 2 a.m., the caller says they heard a voice scream in their ear telling them not to help the friend. Later, driving home on the freeway, they report that a fully formed, solid-looking man appeared in the passenger seat, smiled, waved, and vanished. They took him to be the friend's guardian angel. They add that they used Ouija boards a few more times, linked those periods to things going badly in their life, and eventually got rid of their board.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.95
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 3:36
Play
0:28 · [name withheld] says they and a friend used a Ouija board and talked to various spirits.0:40 · The caller says they eventually got what they call an evil spirit.0:54 · The caller says the spirit said it wanted to kill the friend and would get the friend.1:13 · The caller says they told the friend they would try to help, then left the apartment around 2 a.m.1:29 · About ten steps away, the caller heard what sounded like someone beside them screaming in their ear: [quote withheld]1:42 · The caller says they ran back to the friend's apartment and asked to be let in.1:50 · The caller says the friend told them the friend would send the friend's guardian angel home with them to protect them.2:17 · Driving home on the freeway, the caller says, a man abruptly appeared in the passenger seat.2:22 · The caller describes the man as fully formed, completely solid, not ghostly, wearing jeans and a shirt. He turned, smiled, waved, and disappeared.2:36 · The caller says they concluded the guardian angel really had followed them home.2:57 · The caller says they used a Ouija board a few more times, noticed bad things happening in their life each time, and got rid of the board.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2007.mp3”, starting at 49:48). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives their first name as [name withheld] and is introduced on the Wildcard line from Los Angeles, says the events happened [quote withheld] before they knew better than to use Ouija boards. The caller says they and a friend were using a Ouija board and were talking to “various spirits” when they eventually got what they describe as an evil spirit. The caller says the spirit stated it wanted to kill the friend and that it was going to get the friend, which frightened them, so they stopped for the night. The caller reports telling the friend they did not know much about such things but would try to help prevent the friend from being killed. They then left the friend's apartment at about 2 a.m. The caller says that roughly ten steps from the apartment, in the dark and quiet, they suddenly heard what sounded like someone standing right next to them and screaming in their ear: [quote withheld] The caller says they ran back to the friend's apartment and asked to be let in. The friend calmed the caller down and said the friend would send the friend's guardian angel home with the caller for protection. [name withheld] says they were skeptical of that. Driving home on the freeway afterward, the caller reports, a man suddenly appeared in the passenger seat, fully formed and completely solid, not ghostly, wearing jeans and a shirt. He turned toward the caller, smiled, waved, and then disappeared. The caller says they thought the guardian angel really had followed them home. Asked by the host about Ouija boards generally, they say they used one a few more times afterward but noticed their life would get bad each time. They connected the two and got rid of their board, adding that it had been about ten years since they had used one. The host responds with his own warning against using Ouija boards.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:28

    [name withheld] says they and a friend used a Ouija board and talked to various spirits.

  2. 0:40

    The caller says they eventually got what they call an evil spirit.

  3. 0:54

    The caller says the spirit said it wanted to kill the friend and would get the friend.

  4. 1:13

    The caller says they told the friend they would try to help, then left the apartment around 2 a.m.

  5. 1:29

    About ten steps away, the caller heard what sounded like someone beside them screaming in their ear: [quote withheld]

  6. 1:42

    The caller says they ran back to the friend's apartment and asked to be let in.

  7. 1:50

    The caller says the friend told them the friend would send the friend's guardian angel home with them to protect them.

  8. 2:17

    Driving home on the freeway, the caller says, a man abruptly appeared in the passenger seat.

  9. 2:22

    The caller describes the man as fully formed, completely solid, not ghostly, wearing jeans and a shirt. He turned, smiled, waved, and disappeared.

  10. 2:36

    The caller says they concluded the guardian angel really had followed them home.

  11. 2:57

    The caller says they used a Ouija board a few more times, noticed bad things happening in their life each time, and got rid of the board.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:28

    The caller says they and a friend were using a Ouija board.

  • observation· 0:40

    The caller says they eventually made contact with what they call an evil spirit.

  • observation· 0:54

    The caller says the spirit said it wanted to kill the friend and would get the friend.

  • observation· 1:29

    The caller says they heard what sounded like someone standing beside them and screaming in their ear.

  • observation· 1:33

    The voice, as the caller renders it, told them not to help the friend.

  • hearsay· 1:50

    The caller says the friend told them the friend would send the friend's guardian angel home with them for protection.

  • observation· 2:17

    The caller says a man appeared in the passenger seat of their car while they drove home.

  • observation· 2:22

    The caller describes the man as fully formed and solid, not ghostly, in jeans and a shirt, who turned, smiled, waved, and vanished.

  • interpretation· 2:36

    The caller takes the man in the car to be the friend's guardian angel following them home.

  • interpretation· 2:57

    The caller says later Ouija board use coincided with bad things happening in their life, after which they got rid of the board.

  • host statement· 2:38

    The host asserts that using Ouija boards opens doors a person cannot close.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
55

This is firsthand testimony with a coherent nighttime sequence and some concrete detail. But the events are undated and unnamed, the story does not engage with obvious ordinary explanations, and the final identification of the figure as a guardian angel is an inference, not something the caller perceived.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller describes the events as their own direct experience throughout.
  • Concrete sequence and detail: leaving the apartment at about 2 a.m., roughly ten steps out, listening for anything, then driving home on the freeway.
  • Physical description of the figure: fully formed, solid-looking, in jeans and a shirt, who turned, smiled, waved, and vanished.
Against
  • No date, no names beyond a first name, and no street, building, or freeway named. The events are placed only as [quote withheld]
  • The caller does not address ordinary explanations for either the voice or the figure, though they do voice earlier skepticism about the guardian angel.
  • The identification of the figure as the friend's guardian angel rests on a remark made by the friend before the drive.
Uncertain or missing
  • The line given as the spirit's message ([quote withheld]) appears garbled in the automatic transcript.
  • The labels showing who is speaking are inconsistent across the segment, and lines attributed to the host include material that appears to be the caller's.
Passages cited
  • 1:13
  • 2:22
  • 2:03

What the model inferred (not said on air): The components were assigned from content alone: source proximity (firsthand, about 22/25), specificity (about 9/20), internal consistency (about 14/20), alternative explanations (about 5/20, since common explanations fit easily and are not addressed), calibration (about 8/15, partial separation of what the caller perceived from what they concluded). The score is a judgment about the testimony as recorded, not about whether the events occurred.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
8

The story rests on the caller's own word. There is no document, recording, or photograph, no named location or date that could be checked, and the one other participant does not speak on air.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller gives a generally coherent story of a specific night, including the approximate hour.
  • A second person is said to have taken part in the Ouija session, and a remark by someone else (about the guardian angel) is reported.
Against
  • A claimed witness does not speak on air and is not named.
  • No dates, addresses, records, or physical evidence are described.
  • No outside check was performed for this analysis.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether any physical evidence exists is not stated by the caller and is not presented on air.
Passages cited
  • 0:28
  • 2:17

What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed in the lowest band because nothing in this part of the broadcast can be independently checked. The claimed second participant does not count as on-air confirmation under the scoring guide.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
58

The story contains a stated threat of killing and a shout delivered directly into the caller's ear on a dark street, which is genuinely unsettling. But the later figure is harmless and the telling is partly conversational, which lowers any lasting dread.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The board contact is said to have threatened to kill the friend.
  • A voice is reported as screaming right beside the caller's ear in darkness and quiet at about 2 a.m.
  • A figure appears abruptly inside a car while the caller is driving at night.
Against
  • The figure in the car smiles, waves, and disappears without menace, and the caller takes it as protective.
  • The ending is a general warning about Ouija boards, not an unresolved threat.
  • Some exchanges are light, such as the host's remark that the caller is not a fast learner.
Uncertain or missing
  • The automatic transcript is garbled exactly where the ear-level message is quoted, so its full content is unclear.
Passages cited
  • 0:54
  • 1:29

What the model inferred (not said on air): A judgment of how the story would land on a listener, not a claim about the events.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
52

The setup of a Ouija board, a threatening spirit, and a protective guardian angel is a familiar set of motifs. But the thoroughly solid, ordinary-looking man who appears in the passenger seat and is read as that angel is an unusual combination.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The figure is described as fully formed, completely solid, not ghostly, and dressed in everyday clothes.
  • The protective presence is reported as appearing physically inside a moving vehicle, not as a feeling or a light.
Against
  • Ouija board contact and guardian-angel protection are stock elements of the genre.
  • The ear-level warning and the scare on a dark street are familiar beats.
Uncertain or missing
  • Novelty compared with the rest of the archive cannot be assessed here; this is an automated estimate only.
Passages cited
  • 2:22
  • 2:36

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score is an estimate from content, pending comparison with the rest of the archive. It weighs the solid-figure detail above the stock board-and-spirit setup.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.68 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story.; A secondhand report of the friend's guardian-angel remark.; No physical evidence described or examined..

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Small, unconscious hand movements and expectation during the Ouija session, with the messages shaped by the participants' own expectations. · The caller describes using the board with a friend and says they [quote withheld] What the board spelled out is reported only through the caller's memory.
  • Misperception, or tiredness-related imagery, while driving alone late at night. · The figure is reported while the caller is driving on a freeway, and they place the earlier walk at [quote withheld]
  • The friend's guardian-angel remark primed the caller to interpret a fleeting visual impression. · The caller says the friend told them the friend [quote withheld] shortly before the drive, and the caller immediately labeled the figure as that angel.

What stands out

The story pairs a threatening Ouija contact and a shouted message at ear level with a later, apparently harmless and completely solid figure in a car seat. The caller reads the figure as a protective guardian angel, not a frightening ghost. The most distinctive element is the claim that the protective presence was physically solid and looked like a living person.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.