Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2010 (probable)·Host's story·48 s·at 39:33 in the broadcast

A bat lands on the porch on the morning of the host’s father’s death

The host tells a brief story about a bat that came to their desert home on the morning his father died, landing on the porch in the sun. He says he and at least one other person picked the bat up and carried it into the shade, where it stayed all day. It flew away that night after sunset. He calls the arrival odd and notes the timing, without stating a cause.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.70
How it was toldFirsthand · Told by the host
0:00 / 0:47
Play
0:01 · The host states that his father passed away that morning.0:04 · He says a bat came to them out in the desert, which he calls really odd.0:10 · The bat landed on their porch in the sun.0:17 · He says the bat was fine and that nothing was wrong with it.0:27 · They picked the bat up and carried it to the shade, where it stayed during the day.0:34 · That night, after the sun had set and the desert was quiet, the bat flew away.0:42 · He repeats that the bat stayed all day long on the day of his father’s death.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2010.mp3”, starting at 39:33). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

Speaking on air, the host says that on the morning of his father’s passing a bat came to them out in the desert, which he describes as really odd. He says the bat landed right on their porch in the sun and that there was nothing wrong with it. According to the host, the bat simply decided to land on the porch in front of their front door. He says “we” picked it up and carried it to the shade, where it stayed during the day. He adds that the bat stayed all day long on the day of his father’s death. He says that then, that night, once the sun had set and the desert was quiet, the bat flew away. Just before this story, in surrounding conversation that is not part of it, the host had been talking about strange animal appearances associated with the death of a loved one. He had said [quote withheld] and a caller had described a lemur as their father’s sign. Those lines sit outside the story proper. Within the story itself the host does not say what he thinks the bat was or why it came. He offers no place name, date, or conclusion, and the story ends with the bat’s departure and the return to the broadcast.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:01

    The host states that his father passed away that morning.

  2. 0:04

    He says a bat came to them out in the desert, which he calls really odd.

  3. 0:10

    The bat landed on their porch in the sun.

  4. 0:17

    He says the bat was fine and that nothing was wrong with it.

  5. 0:27

    They picked the bat up and carried it to the shade, where it stayed during the day.

  6. 0:34

    That night, after the sun had set and the desert was quiet, the bat flew away.

  7. 0:42

    He repeats that the bat stayed all day long on the day of his father’s death.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:01

    A bat came to them on the morning of his father’s passing.

  • interpretation· 0:04

    The arrival seemed to him really odd, out in the desert.

  • observation· 0:10

    The bat landed on their porch in the sun.

  • interpretation· 0:17

    Nothing was wrong with the bat.

  • observation· 0:27

    They picked the bat up and carried it to the shade, where it remained during the day.

  • observation· 0:34

    That night, after sunset, the bat flew away.

  • observation· 0:42

    The bat stayed all day long on the day of his father’s death.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
55

A firsthand, consistent story of a single day’s events, but very brief, with no names, dates, or location that can be checked, and with a simple natural reading of the bat’s daytime behavior.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand telling by the person said to have been present.
  • Consistent sequence: morning arrival, all-day stay in the shade, night departure.
  • Concrete detail about where the bat landed and how it was moved.
  • The host addresses the obvious natural possibility by saying the bat appeared healthy.
Against
  • No date, no named place beyond “the desert,” and no named witnesses.
  • The whole story is under a minute long.
  • The connection to the father’s death rests only on the timing.
  • No details that could be checked in principle are supplied.
Uncertain or missing
  • The host never states what he concluded the bat was.
  • The explicit framing about animal appearances at a loved one’s death appears in lines outside the story.
Passages cited
  • 0:04
  • 0:10
  • 0:42

What the model inferred (not said on air): Component judgment: source proximity high (firsthand, about 20 to 22); specificity low to moderate (nothing that can be checked, about 10); internal consistency high (about 16); alternative explanations fit moderately well (about 8); calibration moderate, since he reports rather than concludes (about 10). The very short length keeps the total at the typical “clear but uncorroborated” level, rather than above it.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
8

Nothing beyond the host’s assertion is available: no documentation, no examined evidence, and a second person is only implied by the word “we” and never speaks.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A second person is implied by [quote withheld]
Against
  • No photograph, recording, document, or physical trace is mentioned.
  • The implied second person is unnamed and does not speak on air.
  • No names, dates, or locations are given to check.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the “we” refers to a family member, a household member, or someone else is not stated.
Passages cited
  • 0:27

What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed in the range of 0 to 10 (the host’s assertion only). The implied but silent second person does not reach the “other witnesses claimed” range because no witness is named or heard.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
15

The story is framed around a death, but the reported event is a harmless animal encounter that ends with the bat flying away. There is no threat, intrusion, or lasting dread.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The event is tied to the death of the host’s father.
Against
  • The bat is described as unharmed and simply resting.
  • The encounter ends with the bat leaving at nightfall.
  • The host presents it as odd rather than frightening.
Uncertain or missing
  • Listeners’ responses are not recorded in the transcript.
Passages cited
  • 0:17
  • 0:34

What the model inferred (not said on air): Mildly eerie at most, since the unsettling part is the timing relative to a death rather than anything the bat is said to do.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
53

An animal appearing at the time of a loved one’s death is a familiar omen motif. But the specifics (a healthy bat on a sunlit desert porch, carried into the shade, staying the whole day) give it a distinctive shape.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The specific detail of carrying the bat to the shade and its all-day stay.
  • A daytime bat on a porch rather than the usual night animal omen.
Against
  • An animal as an omen at a death is a common ghost-story element.
  • No strange event beyond the timing is reported.
Uncertain or missing
  • Published originality is provisional in this archive. The part of the score that compares the story with the archive carries little weight for a pilot-sized set.
Passages cited
  • 0:10
  • 0:27

What the model inferred (not said on air): A familiar idea plus one or two distinctive concrete details, placed near the middle rather than at either extreme.

Scoring confidence 0.65 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The host’s firsthand story, told on air; Stated presence of at least one other unnamed person at the time ([quote withheld]). The originality score blends the model's score (50) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A bat may have been exhausted, sheltering, or otherwise resting during daylight, when bats are normally inactive. The host himself raises and rejects this by saying nothing was wrong with the bat. · The host says the bat came [quote withheld] and that [quote withheld] and that it stayed in the shade until nightfall.
  • Coincidence: the bat’s arrival need not be connected to the death, since the only link drawn in the story is the shared timing. · The story’s only stated connection is timing: [quote withheld]

What stands out

The strange part is an ordinary animal behaving oddly rather than a figure or a sound: a single bat, apparently healthy, landing on a sunlit porch and staying there all day, while the host and another person move it into the shade. The host presents the timing relative to his father’s death as the notable part, and he states no cause.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.