Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2010 (probable)·Caller's story·5 min·at 54:54 in the broadcast

A face materializing in the caller’s own vision, followed by a dream

A caller addressed by the host as [name withheld] from California tells of sitting in their living room on the phone about 15 years earlier when a gray spot in the corner of their vision grew and materialized into what they could barely make out as a non-human face. The caller says it went around a corner smiling at them and that they ran out of the room. The caller later had a dream of an abyss and something screaming for them to come outside. The host cut in to say they were out of time, and the call ended.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.75
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 4:33
Play
0:05 · The caller says the experience happened about 15 years ago.0:15 · The caller describes sitting in their living room with all the lights on, talking to a friend on the phone, after praying for a sign.0:45 · The caller notices a small gray spot in the corner of their vision and tries wiping and rinsing their eyes.0:56 · The spot remains and grows. The caller tells the person on the phone about it.1:24 · The caller says it materializes into what they could barely tell was a face.1:45 · The caller says the face did not look human.2:20 · Asked by the host how long it lasted, the caller estimates a couple of minutes, about ten minutes overall.2:48 · The caller says it looked about four or five feet tall.3:01 · The caller says it went around the corner, holding on and smiling at them, and they ran out of the room through it.3:40 · The caller says they woke their mother, who asked whether they had brought a demon in the house.4:00 · The caller sleeps with all lights on. In the dream the caller is in their house, walks to the front door, and sees an abyss and something like a Pope’s hat going by that screams for them to come outside.4:24 · In the dream their parents fall on their knees asking what the caller brought to their house. The caller wakes up.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2010.mp3”, starting at 54:54). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, addressed by the host as [name withheld] from California, says their experience happened [quote withheld] The caller says they were sitting in their living room with all the lights on, talking to a friend on the phone. They had been raised a Seventh-day Adventist and had been praying for a sign that there was something after this life. The caller reports noticing a small gray spot in the corner of their vision, which they first took for an eye problem and tried to wipe away and rinse with water. It stayed, and as they became more afraid the caller says it grew. Over about two minutes it materialized into what they could barely tell was a face. The caller told the host it “didn't look human” and describes it as roughly four or five feet tall. The caller says it went around a corner and appeared to hold on and smile at them, and that they ran out of the room right through it. Asked by the host how long it lasted, the caller estimates no more than a couple of minutes, about ten minutes overall, and says they have seen nothing since. The caller says they woke their mother, who asked whether they had brought a demon in the house, and that they then went to sleep with every light on and their parents’ doors open. In the dream the caller describes being in their own house where they had slept, walking to the front door, and seeing an abyss outside. Something like a Pope’s hat went by and screamed for them to come outside. Their parents appeared and fell on their knees asking what the caller had brought to their house, and the caller woke up. The host said they were out of time, and the call ended.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:05

    The caller says the experience happened about 15 years ago.

  2. 0:15

    The caller describes sitting in their living room with all the lights on, talking to a friend on the phone, after praying for a sign.

  3. 0:45

    The caller notices a small gray spot in the corner of their vision and tries wiping and rinsing their eyes.

  4. 0:56

    The spot remains and grows. The caller tells the person on the phone about it.

  5. 1:24

    The caller says it materializes into what they could barely tell was a face.

  6. 1:45

    The caller says the face did not look human.

  7. 2:20

    Asked by the host how long it lasted, the caller estimates a couple of minutes, about ten minutes overall.

  8. 2:48

    The caller says it looked about four or five feet tall.

  9. 3:01

    The caller says it went around the corner, holding on and smiling at them, and they ran out of the room through it.

  10. 3:40

    The caller says they woke their mother, who asked whether they had brought a demon in the house.

  11. 4:00

    The caller sleeps with all lights on. In the dream the caller is in their house, walks to the front door, and sees an abyss and something like a Pope’s hat going by that screams for them to come outside.

  12. 4:24

    In the dream their parents fall on their knees asking what the caller brought to their house. The caller wakes up.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:45

    The caller saw a small gray spot in the corner of their vision that they first took for an eye problem.

  • observation· 1:24

    The spot grew and materialized into what the caller could barely tell was a face.

  • observation· 1:45

    From what the caller could see, the face did not look human.

  • observation· 2:48

    It looked about four or five feet tall.

  • observation· 3:01

    It went around the corner, holding on, and smiled at the caller.

  • interpretation· 2:32

    The caller wonders whether they fed it fear and that is how it materialized.

  • interpretation· 3:10

    The caller says it was either taunting them or messing with them.

  • hearsay· 3:40

    The caller’s mother asked whether the caller had brought a demon in the house.

  • host statement· 3:19

    The host suggests the caller asked for a sign and got one.

  • host statement· 3:35

    The host says what the caller got was not necessarily from the Lord.

  • observation· 4:15

    In the dream the caller saw an abyss outside and something like a Pope’s hat going by that screamed for them to come outside.

  • observation· 4:24

    In the dream the caller’s parents fell on their knees asking what the caller had brought to their house.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
60

A firsthand story told in sequence with a stated length of time, and the caller is careful to separate what they saw from what they concluded. It is weakened by the lack of specifics that can be checked and by ordinary explanations that fit the reported events easily.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand testimony of the caller’s own visual experience.
  • Concrete sequence: gray spot, attempts to clear their eyes, growth over about two minutes, roughly ten minutes overall.
  • The caller explicitly says they do not know how it happened.
  • The caller says their mother asked [quote withheld] and that they told a friend on the phone during the event.
Against
  • No place name beyond the state, and no date beyond [quote withheld]
  • A disturbance of the eye or of vision fits the gray spot the caller first describes.
  • Expectation after praying for a sign could turn an unclear form into a face.
  • The second episode is explicitly a dream.
Uncertain or missing
  • Several phrases are garbled (for example, the description of the face).
  • The host cut in to say they were out of time, which squeezed the ending.
Passages cited
  • 0:45
  • 0:50
  • 2:32

What the model inferred (not said on air): Component scoring: source proximity high (firsthand but brief and partial, 18); specificity moderate (12); internal consistency good (15); alternative explanations score low because explanations from the eye or the mind, and dream explanations, fit easily (5); how carefully the caller states their claims moderate to good (11). The total is 61, rounded to 60.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
5

Nothing beyond the caller’s own assertion is presented. No photograph, recording, or document is mentioned, and no second person is said to have seen the strange event.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The friend on the phone is said to have heard the caller describe it as it happened.
Against
  • No physical or documentary evidence is mentioned.
  • No name, address, or date that can be checked is given.
  • The mother appears only as someone told afterward and does not speak on air.
Uncertain or missing
  • The caller’s name and state come from the host’s introduction, not from the caller.
Passages cited
  • 0:15
  • 3:40

What the model inferred (not said on air): This falls in the lowest range (the caller’s assertion only), so 0 to 10. I place it at 5 rather than 0 only because a friend on the phone at the time is claimed as a witness, identified only by role, though that person saw nothing.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
66

The story is unsettling because the intrusion happens inside the caller’s own perception, grows as the caller becomes more afraid, and ends with a non-human smiling form and an unresolved nightmare of an abyss and screaming.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A shape grows in the caller’s vision and becomes a face that “didn't look human.”
  • The event grows worse as the caller’s fear grows.
  • It goes around the corner and appears to smile at the caller. The caller says they ran out of the room through it.
  • The dream ends with parents on their knees asking what the caller brought to the house, and no resolution.
Against
  • No physical harm or contact is reported.
  • The second episode is a dream that ends with waking.
  • The host’s comments are brief, and the story is short.
Uncertain or missing
  • The garbled description of the face limits how vividly it can be reconstructed.
Passages cited
  • 3:01
  • 4:15

What the model inferred (not said on air): Scored in the “frightening” range but below the marks for extreme, because there is no reported injury and the episode ends with waking.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
65

The core idea, a dark form becoming a face and a nightmare that follows, is familiar. But the event is placed inside the caller’s own field of vision, which the host says he has never heard before, and the dream images of an abyss and a Pope’s hat are distinctive.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The event is described as happening in the caller’s vision rather than in the room.
  • The host says it is new to him.
  • The dream contains unusual images: an abyss and a screaming form like a Pope’s hat.
Against
  • A dark mass forming a face and a smiling figure are common motifs.
  • A nightmare following a frightening experience is a common pattern.
Uncertain or missing
  • The transcript is short and partly garbled, so some distinctive detail may be lost.
Passages cited
  • 1:27
  • 4:15

What the model inferred (not said on air): Provisional model score of about 65. With a small pilot archive, the part of the score that compares the story with the archive carries little weight, so this is treated as provisional.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.65 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story (live call); No physical evidence, photograph, or recording mentioned; No second witness on air.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A disturbance of the eye or of vision (for example a visual aura, or a shape produced inside the eye itself) that the caller first suspected was an eye problem. · The caller says, [quote withheld] and describes a gray spot [quote withheld] that they tried to wipe away and rinse.
  • Expectation and suggestion may have turned an unclear visual form into a face, given that the caller had been praying for a sign and says the form became clearer as their fear grew. · The caller says they would pray for a sign, that [quote withheld] and that they do not know if they “fed it fear.”
  • An ordinary vivid dream or nightmare following a distressing experience. The caller calls the second episode a dream. · The caller says, [quote withheld] and ends with [quote withheld]

What stands out

The event is described as happening entirely within the caller’s own field of vision, a shape growing inside their eye rather than a figure standing in the room, which the host says is new to him. The story is also split into a waking vision and an immediately following dream with a different set of images (an abyss, a Pope’s hat, screaming).

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.