Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·4 min·at 3:03:32 in the broadcast

A wild man figure reported near an archaeological dig on the Luxembourg-Belgian border

The caller, whose name and location are not given beyond “Europe,” says that in the early 1970s their archaeologist parents were digging at a Gallo-Roman site on the Luxembourg-Belgian border. The caller says a student digger came back in from the porch frightened. She said she had seen a wild-looking, hippie-type man at a tree line across the road. The caller says the group first took him for a vagrant from a nearby village. Later they heard a local World War II story about a man who went mad in the woods, was killed by Nazis, and was called the Red Man of Rodingen. The caller says they and their brother decided the area was haunted. The student left the dig early, and the story ends with the host thanking the caller.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 3:42
Play
0:06 · The caller says the experience happened to them in Europe about ten years ago.0:11 · The caller says both their parents were archaeologists digging a Gallo-Roman site on the Luxembourg-Belgian border for about three years.0:25 · The family stayed in a house on a low, bald, forested mountain. Nearby villages were Pétange and Rodingen, and the dig was near “the Tilburg.”0:38 · Near the end of the summer season, the group had dinner with student diggers on a drizzly, semi-foggy night and was getting ready for bed.0:50 · The caller and their brother were around ten. A female student digger went out on the porch for about five minutes.1:02 · The caller remembers the student coming back looking horribly scared and trembling.1:07 · The student said she had seen a weird hippie guy across the road at the tree line, staring at her.1:15 · The group first thought it was a strange man who had wandered up from Pétange, about a mile and a half to two miles away.1:27 · Later, the student, also called Annie, raised the issue in town. They asked the grocer, but no one in the rural area seemed likely to fit the description.1:49 · The caller then heard a story that during World War II, a man who had lost his wife in the occupation went crazy, ran off to live in the woods, and was killed by the Nazis.2:15 · The caller says no one had heard this story before then.2:21 · The man was called the Red Man of Rodingen and was from a Belgian town eight to ten miles away.2:28 · The caller and their brother said it was haunted, and the student left early because she was so freaked out.2:55 · The host comments that such old or exotic circumstances could work on the mind. The caller agrees and says they remember it to this day.3:11 · The host thanks the caller and remarks that such stories are not confined to the United States.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 3:03:32). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller says the experience happened to them in Europe about ten years ago, though the caller also places it in the early 1970s. The caller says both their parents were archaeologists who dug a Gallo-Roman site on the Luxembourg-Belgian border for about three years. The family always stayed in a house on a low, bald, forested mountain. The caller names the nearby villages as Pétange, on the Luxembourg side, and Rodingen, on the Belgian side. The caller says the dig was near “the Tilburg,” and describes a crew of student diggers.

Near the end of the summer season, on a drizzly, semi-foggy night, the group had dinner and was getting ready for bed. The caller and their brother were around ten. A female student digger went out on the porch for about five minutes and came back. The caller says she looked horribly scared and was trembling. She said she had seen a weird hippie guy across the road at the tree line, south of where they were staying, just standing and staring at her. The group first thought it was a strange man who had wandered up from Pétange, about a mile and a half to two miles away, and did not think much of it.

Later, the caller says, the girl, whom the caller also calls Annie, raised the matter in town, and they asked the grocer. But no one in that rural area seemed likely to fit the description. The caller then heard a story set in World War II, under the Nazi occupation. In it, a man whose wife was lost in the occupation went crazy, ran off to live in the woods, lived roughly, and was hunted down and killed by the Nazis. The caller says no one had heard this story before. The caller says the man was called the Red Man of Rodingen and was from a Belgian town eight to ten miles away. The caller and their brother said the area was haunted. The girl left early that week, with about two weeks left in the season. The host comments that such circumstances could work on the mind. The caller agrees and says they remember it to this day.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:06

    The caller says the experience happened to them in Europe about ten years ago.

  2. 0:11

    The caller says both their parents were archaeologists digging a Gallo-Roman site on the Luxembourg-Belgian border for about three years.

  3. 0:25

    The family stayed in a house on a low, bald, forested mountain. Nearby villages were Pétange and Rodingen, and the dig was near “the Tilburg.”

  4. 0:38

    Near the end of the summer season, the group had dinner with student diggers on a drizzly, semi-foggy night and was getting ready for bed.

  5. 0:50

    The caller and their brother were around ten. A female student digger went out on the porch for about five minutes.

  6. 1:02

    The caller remembers the student coming back looking horribly scared and trembling.

  7. 1:07

    The student said she had seen a weird hippie guy across the road at the tree line, staring at her.

  8. 1:15

    The group first thought it was a strange man who had wandered up from Pétange, about a mile and a half to two miles away.

  9. 1:27

    Later, the student, also called Annie, raised the issue in town. They asked the grocer, but no one in the rural area seemed likely to fit the description.

  10. 1:49

    The caller then heard a story that during World War II, a man who had lost his wife in the occupation went crazy, ran off to live in the woods, and was killed by the Nazis.

  11. 2:15

    The caller says no one had heard this story before then.

  12. 2:21

    The man was called the Red Man of Rodingen and was from a Belgian town eight to ten miles away.

  13. 2:28

    The caller and their brother said it was haunted, and the student left early because she was so freaked out.

  14. 2:55

    The host comments that such old or exotic circumstances could work on the mind. The caller agrees and says they remember it to this day.

  15. 3:11

    The host thanks the caller and remarks that such stories are not confined to the United States.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 1:07

    A student digger reported seeing a wild-looking, hippie-type man across the road at the tree line.

  • hearsay· 1:38

    The student described the figure as a wild-looking, hippie-type man who was just standing and staring at her.

  • hearsay· 1:49

    The caller heard a local story that during World War II a man lost his wife, went crazy, lived in the woods, and was killed by the Nazis.

  • hearsay· 2:21

    The man in the local story was called the Red Man of Rodingen.

  • interpretation· 2:28

    The caller and their brother concluded that the whole area was haunted.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
56

The caller did not see the figure themself. The core sighting is secondhand, from a student digger, but the story gives concrete places, a clear sequence, and a reported aftermath. An ordinary explanation, a living person seen in poor light, is available and was first offered by the caller. The date is also inconsistent within the story.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Concrete setting: Gallo-Roman dig on the Luxembourg-Belgian border, nearby Pétange and Rodingen, student diggers, dinner, drizzly night.
  • The caller separates what they saw (the digger frightened and trembling) from what she said she saw.
  • The caller first offers an ordinary explanation: [quote withheld]
Against
  • The core sighting is secondhand. The alleged witness does not speak on air.
  • The dates don't match: [quote withheld] versus [quote withheld]
  • Some names and words are unclear in the transcript, such as “Peytonge,” “Tilburg,” and “her suit.”
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the figure was a living person or something else is not resolved.
  • The local Red Man story is reported only as something “we heard,” with no source named.
Passages cited
  • 0:06
  • 1:07
  • 1:15

What the model inferred (not said on air): I treat this as a typical brief secondhand sighting story. It is specific enough to judge, but the caller did not witness it directly, and a simple ordinary explanation is left open.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

There is a claimed secondhand witness and a set of checkable names and places. But there is no physical evidence, no one backs it up on air, and no outside check was made. This falls in the part of the scoring guide for checkable details that are claimed but not checked, or other witnesses who are claimed.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Named or place-specific details: Gallo-Roman dig, Luxembourg-Belgian border, Pétange, Rodingen, early 1970s.
  • A second claimed witness (the student digger) is reported to have seen the figure.
Against
  • The student digger does not speak on air.
  • No photograph, recording, document, or physical trace is mentioned.
  • No outside check was performed.
Uncertain or missing
  • The transcription of place names and the “Red Man” story is uncertain in places.
  • The caller's date is inconsistent, which makes the timeline harder to check.
Passages cited
  • 0:11
  • 1:07
  • 1:49

What the model inferred (not said on air): Checkable details exist, but none are verified in the transcript. The claimed witness is not an independent second witness on air.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
48

The story has a rural night setting, a frightened student digger, a wild-looking man staring from a tree line, and a wartime legend of a madman killed by Nazis. It is unsettling but has no direct threat, physical contact, or long encounter for the caller.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A student digger is reported as [quote withheld] after seeing the figure.
  • The figure is described as [quote withheld] at a tree line.
  • The later story involves a man going mad in the woods and being killed by Nazis.
Against
  • No harm or threat is reported to the caller or others.
  • The group first treats it as a wandering stranger, and the host responds with an ordinary-sounding comment.
Uncertain or missing
  • The figure's appearance and intent are not described beyond the staring.
  • The story ends unresolved rather than building.
Passages cited
  • 1:02
  • 1:07
  • 1:56

What the model inferred (not said on air): Creepiness is judged from the reported images and the frightened witness, not from the caller's delivery or whether the story is true.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
53

The story uses familiar ghost-story elements: a figure at a tree line, a rural haunted area, and a local legend of a dead man. But the archaeological-dig setting and the specific [quote withheld] label give it a distinctive frame.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The setting is an archaeological dig with student diggers and the caller's archaeologist parents.
  • The legend is tied to a named local figure, [quote withheld]
Against
  • The core sighting, a figure seen at a rural tree line at night, is a common motif.
  • A local legend attached after a sighting is a familiar story pattern.
Uncertain or missing
  • Originality compared with the rest of the archive is not calculated here. The score is the model's provisional estimate.
  • Place names are transcribed in different ways, so how specific the setting is remains partly uncertain.
Passages cited
  • 0:11
  • 1:07
  • 2:21

What the model inferred (not said on air): I score this as a familiar setup with a distinctive detail, rather than a stock story or something wholly new.

Scoring confidence 0.78 · analysis confidence 0.76 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: the caller's firsthand story about the dinner, the student digger's reported fright, and the local story; the alleged sighting is secondhand within the story; no photograph, recording, document, or second witness on air. The originality score blends the model's score (50) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A living person, such as a vagrant or local man, was seen at the tree line. · The caller themself first suggests [quote withheld]
  • Low light and fog on an unfamiliar rural night may have made a person or shape look more alarming. · The night is described as “drizzly, semi-foggy,” and the sighting is at a tree line across the road.
  • The later local Red Man story may have shaped how the group read the sighting after the fact. · The caller says they first thought it was a wandering man, then later heard the World War II story and decided the area was haunted.

What stands out

The story is set at an archaeological dig, with a family of archaeologists, rather than in a haunted home. The strange part is entirely secondhand: the caller reports a student digger's sighting and a local wartime legend.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.