Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
date unknown·Caller's story·4 min·at 50:55 in the broadcast

Woman in a white dress pursues a car on Monterey Highway, 1951

A caller named [name withheld], from Los Banos, California, relays a story they say their father told them about their father's cousin [name withheld]. According to [name withheld], in 1951 [name withheld] was driving north from a movie theater in Morgan Hill toward San Jose on a stretch of the Monterey Highway known as “Blood Alley.” A woman in a white dress at the roadside kept pace with the accelerating car and then appeared at the window as a skeletal face. [name withheld] says [name withheld] braked, prayed, and drove back to [name withheld]'s mother's house instead.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.95
How it was toldSecondhand · Live call
0:00 / 4:08
Play
0:09 · [name withheld] says the story happened in 1951 and was given to them by their father. It happened to their father's cousin [name withheld].0:17 · [name withheld] was at a movie theater in Morgan Hill, California, and was leaving toward San Jose.0:31 · [name withheld] drove north on the Monterey Highway, which [name withheld] says is called “Blood Alley,” at about 45 mph in an old car.0:47 · [name withheld] saw a young-looking woman walking slowly at the side of the road in a white dress, looking down, and slowly passed her.1:03 · [name withheld] watched her in the rearview mirror and slowed to 10 to 15 mph, then got a nervous feeling and began to speed up.1:29 · At 35 to 40 mph [name withheld] looked back and she was no farther away.1:53 · At 50 to 55 mph she was closer, on the passenger side.2:41 · At 70 to 75 mph, looking into the side mirror, [name withheld] saw a white dress floating next to the car.2:59 · Looking at the window, [name withheld] reported a skeleton's face with white straw hair, mouth open.3:08 · [name withheld] slammed on the brakes in the middle of the road, closed their eyes, and said a prayer. When [name withheld] looked back, it was gone.3:20 · [name withheld] turned around and drove about 20 miles to their mother's house instead. [name withheld] says [name withheld] never went down that road again if [name withheld] could avoid it.3:31 · [name withheld] told the story to the whole family.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1995.mp3”, starting at 50:55). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

[name withheld], calling from Los Banos, California, says they are passing on a story given to them by their father about their father's cousin, [name withheld], and that the events happened in 1951. [name withheld] had been at a movie theater in Morgan Hill, California, and was driving north toward San Jose on a stretch of the Monterey Highway that [name withheld] says is called “Blood Alley.” [name withheld] says [name withheld] was going about 45 miles an hour in an old car when [name withheld] saw a young-looking woman walking slowly at the side of the road in a white dress, looking down. [name withheld] slowed and watched her in the rearview mirror, easing down to 10 to 15 mph, then got a nervous feeling and sped up. When [name withheld] looked back at 35 to 40 mph, [name withheld] says, she was no farther away than before. At 50 to 55 mph she was closer, at the passenger side. At 70 to 75 mph [name withheld] looked into the side mirror and, [name withheld] says, saw a white dress floating beside the car. Looking at the window, [name withheld] reported seeing the face of a skeleton with white straw hair, mouth open. [name withheld] slammed on the brakes in the middle of the road, closed their eyes tightly, and said a prayer. When [name withheld] looked again, it was gone. [name withheld] turned around and drove about 20 miles to [name withheld]'s mother's house instead. [name withheld] says that as far as they know, [name withheld] never went down that road again if [name withheld] could avoid it. [name withheld] says [name withheld] told the whole family. Art Bell remarks that many people have died on that road.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:09

    [name withheld] says the story happened in 1951 and was given to them by their father. It happened to their father's cousin [name withheld].

  2. 0:17

    [name withheld] was at a movie theater in Morgan Hill, California, and was leaving toward San Jose.

  3. 0:31

    [name withheld] drove north on the Monterey Highway, which [name withheld] says is called “Blood Alley,” at about 45 mph in an old car.

  4. 0:47

    [name withheld] saw a young-looking woman walking slowly at the side of the road in a white dress, looking down, and slowly passed her.

  5. 1:03

    [name withheld] watched her in the rearview mirror and slowed to 10 to 15 mph, then got a nervous feeling and began to speed up.

  6. 1:29

    At 35 to 40 mph [name withheld] looked back and she was no farther away.

  7. 1:53

    At 50 to 55 mph she was closer, on the passenger side.

  8. 2:41

    At 70 to 75 mph, looking into the side mirror, [name withheld] saw a white dress floating next to the car.

  9. 2:59

    Looking at the window, [name withheld] reported a skeleton's face with white straw hair, mouth open.

  10. 3:08

    [name withheld] slammed on the brakes in the middle of the road, closed their eyes, and said a prayer. When [name withheld] looked back, it was gone.

  11. 3:20

    [name withheld] turned around and drove about 20 miles to their mother's house instead. [name withheld] says [name withheld] never went down that road again if [name withheld] could avoid it.

  12. 3:31

    [name withheld] told the story to the whole family.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • hearsay· 0:12

    [name withheld] says the story is a ghost story given to them by their father and concerning their father's cousin [name withheld].

  • observation· 0:47

    [name withheld] saw a young-looking woman walking slowly at the side of the road wearing a white dress, looking down.

  • observation· 1:29

    When [name withheld] looked back at 35 to 40 mph, the woman had not fallen farther behind.

  • observation· 1:59

    As [name withheld] accelerated, the woman came closer, on the passenger side.

  • observation· 2:57

    [name withheld] saw a white dress floating next to the car.

  • observation· 2:59

    [name withheld] reported seeing a skeleton's face with white straw hair, mouth open, at the window.

  • observation· 3:20

    After [name withheld] braked and prayed, the figure was gone.

  • interpretation· 0:03

    [name withheld] presents the story as a ghost story.

  • host statement· 2:09

    The host asserts that many people have died on that road.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
55

A coherent, ordered secondhand story with concrete specifics (year, towns, road, speeds). But it reaches the caller through at least two retellings, and it shows no awareness of possible ordinary causes. The cap for secondhand stories applies.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Concrete, checkable specifics: 1951, Morgan Hill, San Jose, the Monterey Highway (“Blood Alley”), speeds, and sequence.
  • An ordered, consistent escalation from roadside sighting to window image with no self-contradictions.
  • At one point the caller separates what [name withheld] did from what [name withheld] concluded: [quote withheld]
Against
  • The story is secondhand: it was given to the caller by their father about their father's cousin.
  • The caller raises and addresses no alternative explanation.
  • The details reach the caller at third hand, allowing drift before the broadcast.
Uncertain or missing
  • [name withheld]'s age and other circumstances are unstated.
  • Some lines are garbled or oddly attributed in the automatic transcript.
Passages cited
  • 0:12
  • 0:26
  • 2:50

What the model inferred (not said on air): The components (source proximity, specificity, consistency, alternative explanations, and calibration) are my judgment from what was said. The cap of 60 for secondhand stories is applied by rule.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
14

Only the caller's secondhand word is present. There are checkable specifics (a year, towns, a named road, and a named person), but nothing was checked and there is no documentation or on-air second witness.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Checkable specifics given but not verified: 1951, Morgan Hill, San Jose, the Monterey Highway (“Blood Alley”).
  • A named person, [name withheld], is identified as the one who experienced it.
Against
  • No photograph, recording, document, or physical trace is claimed.
  • No second witness speaks on air.
  • The story is relayed through the caller's father before reaching the broadcast.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether [name withheld] or any family member could be contacted is not addressed.
  • The road name “Blood Alley” is given as a local usage without any source.
Passages cited
  • 0:09
  • 0:17
  • 3:31

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score falls in the 11 to 25 range because checkable identifiers exist but were never checked. The cap of 50 is far above this score.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
68

The story escalates steadily, from a figure that will not fall behind to one that arrives at the passenger window. It ends in a skeletal face with an open mouth right beside the driver, an intrusion into the closed space of a moving car at night.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Sustained escalation as the driver accelerates and the figure keeps pace.
  • The figure reaches the passenger side of the car.
  • A skeleton's face with white straw hair and open mouth is reported at the window.
  • The driver abandons the route and is said never to use the road again.
Against
  • The event ends quickly after the prayer, with no injury or lasting pursuit.
  • The first sighting is of an ordinary-looking pedestrian, which mutes the opening.
Uncertain or missing
  • The look of the face is reported at third hand and could have changed in retelling.
Passages cited
  • 2:04
  • 2:59
  • 3:37

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score is my judgment of the story's effect on a listener, not a claim about the events.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
50

The core idea, a woman in white at the roadside who cannot be outrun, is a familiar road-ghost frame. But the escalation to a skeletal face at the driver's window, and the mirror-by-mirror pacing, give it a distinctive detail.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Unusual detail: the figure changes from an ordinary pedestrian to a skeleton with white straw hair at the car window.
  • The pursuit is tracked step by step through the rearview mirror, speed, and side mirror.
Against
  • A woman in white on a lonely highway is a very common ghost-story motif.
  • The “Blood Alley” fatal-accident framing is a stock road-legend setting.
Uncertain or missing
  • Novelty compared with the rest of the archive cannot be assessed from a single story.
Passages cited
  • 0:53
  • 2:59

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score is a provisional estimate based on content. The published value would be adjusted by comparison with the rest of the archive, which is not available here.

Scoring confidence 0.70 · analysis confidence 0.75 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's secondhand story (their father's account of cousin [name withheld]'s experience).. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Mistaking a real pedestrian at night in poor lighting, with the later window image produced by lighting, reflections, or the driver's expectation. · The encounter begins with an apparently ordinary woman walking at the roadside after a night movie showing, and all later sightings are reported through mirrors or a window at speed.
  • A deliberate prank or hoax by a person at the roadside. · The figure is said to stay alongside the car and approach the passenger side, which is behavior a person could perform deliberately.
  • Details may have drifted across two retellings ([name withheld] to [name withheld]'s family, then [name withheld]'s father to [name withheld]) before the story reached the broadcast. · [name withheld] says the story was given to them by their father and happened to their father's cousin, so it has passed through at least two tellings before the call.

What stands out

The story is a secondhand road-legend-style pursuit. The figure is first seen as an ordinary pedestrian, then is reported to keep pace with an accelerating car before turning into a skeletal face at the window. The escalation through a mirror and a side window is the distinctive part.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.