Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
date unknown·Caller's story·2 min·at 55:04 in the broadcast

Missing

Unavailable.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.85
How it was toldUnclear · Told by the host
0:00 / 2:22
Play
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1995.mp3”, starting at 55:04). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

Unavailable.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

    Scores, with reasons

    An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

    Believability
    A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
    0

    Evidence for and against
    Evidence strength
    Support in the story that others could check
    0

    Evidence for and against
    Creepiness
    How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
    0

    Evidence for and against
    Originality
    How different it is from familiar recurring details
    51

    Evidence for and against

    Scoring confidence 0.00 · analysis confidence 0.00 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: the word of the person telling it. The originality score blends the model's score (0) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

    What stands out

    Unavailable for analysis

    Related stories

    Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.