Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
date unknown·Caller's story·4 min·at 33:28 in the broadcast

Pale, unresponsive hitchhiker figure on Piper's Gap Road

A caller who gives the name [name withheld], from Pueblo, Colorado, tells Art Bell a story dated to the summer of 1986, shortly before the caller entered the service. [name withheld] and two high school friends had just left a house in the country that was [quote withheld] They were driving back into town along Piper's Gap Road when fog came down. At an intersection the car pulled over for a man standing at the roadside with his thumb out. The caller says the man never responded, was [quote withheld] and kept staring down the road. The caller drove away and says they still think about it. When asked, the caller says they do not know what they saw and guesses it was a ghost.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.85
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 4:19
Play
0:37 · The caller says they and two high school friends drove, in the summer of 1986, to a house in the country about six or seven miles from their town that was reputed to be haunted.0:49 · They went inside, messed around, saw nothing interesting, got bored, and left.1:14 · Driving back into town on Piper's Gap Road, they ran into heavy fog. The caller assumed it was ordinary weather.1:39 · While driving they discussed stories about people who pick up hitchhikers who then vanish from the car.2:14 · At an intersection they could make out a person standing at the roadside with his thumb out, a hitchhiker.2:22 · The caller wanted to pick the man up, and the caller's friends objected. The caller, who was driving, pulled the car over.2:39 · The front-seat passenger rolled down the window and asked the man whether he needed a ride.2:43 · The caller reports a pale face and that the man was [quote withheld] still looking down the road, motionless and giving no sign he knew they were there.3:08 · The caller hit the gas and drove away as fast as they could.3:21 · Nine years later, the caller says they still think about it and it gives them the shivers.3:28 · Asked by Bell what they thought they saw, the caller says they do not know, had never seen the man before, and guess it was a ghost.4:00 · Bell closes by thanking the caller and mentioning other hitchhiker stories, including one about a hitchhiker speaking of Gabriel's horn.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1995.mp3”, starting at 33:28). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives the name [name withheld] from Pueblo, Colorado (listening on KCSJ) and says they are [quote withheld] places the story in the summer of 1986, shortly before going into the service. The caller says they and [quote withheld] drove out to a place in the country, six or seven miles from their town, that was [quote withheld] They went inside, were [quote withheld] saw nothing interesting, got bored, and left. Driving back toward town on “Piper's Gap Road,” the caller says, it turned very foggy, which they took to be ordinary weather. While driving they talked about people who pick up hitchhikers and then find the passenger gone. Approaching an intersection where another road joined theirs, they could [quote withheld] with his thumb out, a hitchhiker. The caller says they wanted to stop. Their friends objected because of the stories they had just been discussing. The caller was driving and pulled over anyway. The front-seat passenger rolled down the window and asked whether the man wanted a ride. In the caller's telling, the man did not answer. The caller says the man was [quote withheld] kept looking down the road in the direction they had come from, and [quote withheld] The caller says they [quote withheld] Nine years later, the caller says, they still think about it, and it gives them “the shivers.” Asked by Bell what they think they saw, the caller says they do not know, that they had never seen the man before and come from a small town, and that [quote withheld] Bell thanks the caller and remarks on other hitchhiker stories then going around.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:37

    The caller says they and two high school friends drove, in the summer of 1986, to a house in the country about six or seven miles from their town that was reputed to be haunted.

  2. 0:49

    They went inside, messed around, saw nothing interesting, got bored, and left.

  3. 1:14

    Driving back into town on Piper's Gap Road, they ran into heavy fog. The caller assumed it was ordinary weather.

  4. 1:39

    While driving they discussed stories about people who pick up hitchhikers who then vanish from the car.

  5. 2:14

    At an intersection they could make out a person standing at the roadside with his thumb out, a hitchhiker.

  6. 2:22

    The caller wanted to pick the man up, and the caller's friends objected. The caller, who was driving, pulled the car over.

  7. 2:39

    The front-seat passenger rolled down the window and asked the man whether he needed a ride.

  8. 2:43

    The caller reports a pale face and that the man was [quote withheld] still looking down the road, motionless and giving no sign he knew they were there.

  9. 3:08

    The caller hit the gas and drove away as fast as they could.

  10. 3:21

    Nine years later, the caller says they still think about it and it gives them the shivers.

  11. 3:28

    Asked by Bell what they thought they saw, the caller says they do not know, had never seen the man before, and guess it was a ghost.

  12. 4:00

    Bell closes by thanking the caller and mentioning other hitchhiker stories, including one about a hitchhiker speaking of Gabriel's horn.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 2:14

    A figure that looked like a person stood at the roadside with his thumb out, at the point where a side road joined Piper's Gap Road.

  • observation· 2:20

    The standing figure had his thumb out, apparently hitchhiking.

  • observation· 2:43

    A face went ashen or pale during the encounter. In the automatic transcript it is not clear whether this refers to the passenger or to the man at the roadside, since both appear in the same run of text.

  • observation· 3:00

    The man at the roadside was very pale.

  • observation· 3:08

    The man did not move or show any sign of awareness of the car or of being spoken to.

  • observation· 3:04

    The caller says the man was looking down the road in the direction they had come from.

  • hearsay· 1:55

    Before the encounter the group had been talking about stories of people who give hitchhikers a ride and then find them gone from the car.

  • hearsay· 0:37

    The house they visited was reputed to be haunted. Nothing strange is reported inside it.

  • interpretation· 3:44

    The caller's conclusion is that what they saw was a ghost.

  • host statement· 4:00

    The host states that many stories are going around about hitchhikers getting into cars and then disappearing.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
60

A firsthand story with concrete anchors (road name, summer 1986, distance, number of companions) and a coherent sequence. But the only strange things reported are pallor and silence, which an ordinary roadside encounter explains well, and the automatic transcript of the pale-face moment is garbled.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand presence in the car as driver ([quote withheld]).
  • Concrete specifics: “Piper's Gap Road,” [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
  • An ordered sequence, with answers to the host's questions.
  • The caller separates what they saw from what they conclude: “i don't know” comes before [quote withheld]
Against
  • No physical, verifiable trace, and the figure is never said to have vanished.
  • The encounter is fully compatible with meeting a real, unresponsive person on a foggy road.
  • The “ashen” passage is garbled in the automatic transcript, and it is unclear whose face is described.
  • The companions never speak, so their part rests on the caller's word alone.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the pale face describes the man or the passenger.
  • Whether the event occurred exactly at night.
  • The caller's exact age, and the name of their hometown.
Passages cited
  • 1:14
  • 3:08
  • 3:44

What the model inferred (not said on air): Component estimate: source proximity 20 (firsthand, present, driving); specificity 13; internal consistency 12 (garbled pale-face passage); alternative explanations 6 (an ordinary person fits easily); calibration 9 (the caller says outright that they do not know, then names a guess). The total is 60.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
15

Nothing beyond the caller's own story is offered: no documentation, no examined material, and the claimed companions do not speak on air. Some checkable specifics exist (a named road, a year, a region), which places it in the 11 to 25 range.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Checkable specifics are given: “Piper's Gap Road,” [quote withheld] and a North Carolina origin.
  • Two other people are said to have been in the car.
Against
  • No photograph, recording, or document is offered.
  • No second witness speaks on air.
  • No outside check was done, and no outside evidence is in the request.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the road name is transcribed correctly.
  • Whether the town and friends could be identified from the story.
Passages cited
  • 0:37
  • 1:14

What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed at the lower end of the 11 to 25 range because the only checkable items are a road name and a year, and the claimed witnesses are unnamed and silent. No outside check was recorded, so the cap of 50 is not approached.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
33

Mildly eerie: a motionless, pale figure at a foggy roadside who does not respond. But there is no threat, no physical contact, no pursuit, and no intrusion into a home or bedroom.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Night fog on a rural road ([quote withheld]).
  • A figure that is pale and unresponsive rather than interactive.
  • The caller's own lingering unease nine years later ([quote withheld]).
Against
  • No malice, injury, chase, or escalation.
  • The caller leaves the scene immediately, and nothing follows the car.
  • The haunted-house visit produced nothing frightening at all.
Uncertain or missing
  • The visual detail is thin, so the listener's mental image is largely supplied by the “ghost” label.
Passages cited
  • 1:14
  • 3:00

What the model inferred (not said on air): Rated mainly on atmosphere (night, fog, an unresponsive figure) rather than on any reported threat.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
46

The roadside-hitchhiker frame is a familiar urban legend, and the host himself says such stories are numerous. The distinctive element here is that nothing further happens: no vanishing, no message, only a man who will not answer.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The host places it among a large class of similar stories ([quote withheld]).
  • The caller's own group had just been recounting the same kind of legend.
Against
  • The absence of a disappearance and the sheer silence of the figure depart from the standard vanishing-hitchhiker form.
  • The unrelated haunted-house visit before it is an unusual framing device.
Uncertain or missing
  • Originality here is provisional. The comparison with the rest of the archive is calculated separately, and the model's value is an editorial estimate.
Passages cited
  • 2:20
  • 3:08

What the model inferred (not said on air): The model's estimate is set at 40 (familiar frame, one distinctive detail). The published value, compared with the rest of the archive, will be recalculated later.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.70 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story by telephone.; Two companions claimed present in the car, unnamed, who do not speak on air.; No photographs, recordings, documents, or physical traces offered.. The originality score blends the model's score (40) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • The man was an ordinary person standing by the road at night (drunk, injured, stranded, or simply unwilling to respond), and the episode was a normal roadside encounter that the caller later read as paranormal. · The only strange things reported are the man's pallor and silence. The caller says the man [quote withheld] and that they drove off rather than waiting to see anything more.
  • Poor visibility and the car's lighting gave a distorted impression of a figure at a distance. · The caller says the fog “just sat down” and that they could only [quote withheld] at the roadside.

What stands out

The story has no usual payoff. The roadside figure does not vanish, speak, or behave strangely, and the caller's “ghost” reading rests mainly on the man's silence and pallor. The haunted-house opening produces nothing at all, and the reported event happens only afterward, on the road in fog.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.