Nurse's faxed letter about a patient's death and alarm clocks at 11:07
A faxed letter read on air by the host, from a registered nurse in Sandy, Utah, describes a night shift in a 120-bed facility. A patient the letter calls [name withheld] was expected to die. The writer reports that [name withheld]'s breathing and heartbeat stopped at 11:07 p.m. At that same minute, six alarm clocks on the hall went off and a call light in the now-empty room came on. The letter ends with the writer's line, [quote withheld]
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 1:02:24). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
According to the faxed letter read on air, the writer is a registered nurse working a 7-to-7 night shift in a 120-bed facility. The letter describes a patient [quote withheld] [name withheld] was 68 years old, never married, and had no family. [name withheld] held three doctorate degrees, spoke seven languages, and kept a private room decorated with objects collected in travel. The writer says [name withheld] had Epstein-Barr virus and, as the disease progressed, was moved from the private room to a “medicare hall.” The writer says that when they came to work one night, they were told during report that [name withheld] had taken a turn for the worse and would probably die on that shift. Within an hour, they say, a CNA told them that [name withheld] had stopped breathing. The writer went in with two CNAs. As they listened for a heartbeat, [name withheld] opened both eyes, took a deep breath, and went back to breathing normally. At 11:07 p.m., the writer says, they were asked again to check [name withheld]. This time they found no heartbeat. As they backed away, [name withheld] opened both eyes, sat up, and fell back to the pillow. The writer notes that an involuntary muscle movement in a dead person [quote withheld] The writer then reports that another CNA ran in saying six alarm clocks on her 30-bed hall had each gone off at exactly 11:07, though no one there used alarm clocks. Back at the nurse's desk, they say, another nurse called to ask whether there had been a power surge, because the call light in [name withheld]'s empty room had gone off at 11:07.
Reported events, in order
- 0:17
The letter writer, a registered nurse, says they were working their usual 7-to-7 night shift in a 120-bed facility.
- 0:24
They describe a patient they call [name withheld]: 68, never married, no family, three doctorate degrees, seven languages, and a private room with collected objects.
- 1:05
[name withheld] is said to have had Epstein-Barr virus and to have been moved from the private room to a “medicare hall” as the disease progressed.
- 1:23
At report, the nurse is told [name withheld] had taken a turn for the worse and would probably die on their shift.
- 1:36
Within an hour, a CNA tells them [name withheld] had stopped breathing.
- 1:42
The nurse goes in with two CNAs. As they listen for a heartbeat, [name withheld] opens both eyes, takes a deep breath, and goes back to breathing normally.
- 2:00
At 11:07 p.m., they are asked again to check [name withheld].
- 2:10
The nurse finds no heartbeat. [name withheld] opens both eyes, sits up, and falls back to the pillow.
- 2:21
The writer comments that watching an involuntary muscle movement in a dead person frightens anyone.
- 2:34
Another CNA runs in to report that six alarm clocks on the 30-bed hall went off, each at exactly 11:07, though no one there used alarm clocks.
- 3:03
Back at the nurse's desk, another nurse calls to ask if there was a power surge, because the call light in [name withheld]'s empty room had gone off at 11:07.
- 3:25
The letter closes, [quote withheld]
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 1:50
The nurse says they went into the room and, as they listened for a heartbeat, the patient opened both eyes and took a deep breath.
- observation· 2:12
The nurse says that at 11:07 p.m. they checked the patient again and found no heartbeat.
- observation· 2:14
The nurse says the patient opened both eyes, sat up, and fell back to the pillow.
- observation· 2:43
The nurse says six alarm clocks on their 30-bed hall went off at exactly 11:07.
- observation· 2:55
The nurse says no one on the hall used alarm clocks.
- hearsay· 3:12
The nurse says another nurse called to ask whether there had been a power surge, because the call light in [name withheld]'s empty room had gone off at 11:07.
- interpretation· 2:21
The writer puts the patient's movements after death down to involuntary muscle movement, not to anything paranormal.
- hearsay· 1:36
The letter writer says a CNA told them that [name withheld] had stopped breathing.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
A firsthand story by the nurse, who says they were present, with a specific time and sequence. The writer offers an ordinary explanation for the body's movements. It is a faxed letter with no facility name or identifiers that can be checked, and the clock and call-light events have an easy electrical explanation that the letter itself raises.
Evidence for and against
- A firsthand story from the person said to be present at the bedside.
- A precise, consistent time of 11:07 p.m. across three separate reported events.
- The writer separates what they saw from how they explain it, naming involuntary muscle movement as the likely cause of the body's movements.
- The sequence hangs together and fits the host's framing without contradiction.
- An unverified faxed letter, with no facility name, full name, or records referenced.
- Several clock and light activations in one minute fit a shared electrical cause, which the letter itself mentions.
- No independent witness speaks on air. The CNAs and the other nurse claimed in the letter are not heard from.
- The labels showing who is speaking are automatic. The host reads the letter, so lines labeled as the host are the letter's text.
- Whether the clocks were plugged in, or were all the same type, is not stated.
- The patient's age as reported, the exact type of facility, and the date of the events are unstated.
- 1:42
- 2:21
- 2:43
What the model inferred (not said on air): My judgment of the components: source proximity high (firsthand), specificity moderate to high (a time and counts, but no identifiers that can be checked), internal consistency high, alternative explanations moderately available (an electrical event; a reflex after death), and calibration good (the writer names an ordinary cause). The cap for secondhand stories does not apply, but the letter form and the lack of specifics that can be checked keep the score below the “detailed, consistent, checkable” level.
Only the writer's written word is available. Some specifics that could be checked are given (a city, a first name, a time), but nothing is verified, and there is no documentation or second on-air witness.
Evidence for and against
- Partial identifying specifics: [quote withheld] and the time 11:07 p.m.
- Several people are claimed to have been involved.
- No photograph, recording, log, or document is presented or examined.
- No second witness speaks on air.
- The facility and the patient are unnamed or go by a made-up name.
- Whether the fax has a signature or return address is not stated.
- The name “[name withheld]” and the city are unclear in the transcript.
- 0:12
- 0:24
What the model inferred (not said on air): Falls at 11 to 25 (specifics that could be checked are given but not checked; other witnesses are only claimed). No outside check was done, so the cap of 50 is not approached.
The setting is a night-shift nursing hall, and the story centers on a death, a body that moves after the heartbeat stops, and devices going off in an empty room at the same minute. There is no threat or malevolence, which keeps it below the frightening range.
Evidence for and against
- A patient is reported to die during the writer's shift.
- The body is said to open its eyes, sit up, and fall back after no heartbeat is found.
- Devices are said to go off at the moment of death, including a call light in an empty room.
- The writer says the group was [quote withheld]
- No presence is described as threatening or hostile.
- The writer offers a natural explanation for the body's movement.
- The letter closes on a respectful note, not an ominous one.
- The emotional intensity of the original letter cannot be judged from the host's reading.
- 2:12
- 2:59
What the model inferred (not said on air): Judged as a story: a death plus devices going off together in a care setting is unsettling but not menacing. There is no physical threat and no escalation beyond the single night, so it lands in the middle of the range.
Clocks or devices acting oddly at the moment of a death is a familiar idea. But the mix of six alarm clocks on a hall where clocks were said not to be used, plus a call light in the emptied room, gives it a distinctive detail.
Evidence for and against
- A specific, unusual cluster: six alarm clocks at the same minute plus a call light.
- The writer states the alarm clocks were not in use on that hall.
- Devices reacting at the time of a death is a recurring ghost-story theme.
- The bedside death scene uses familiar elements.
- Published originality is computed compared with the rest of the archive. With a small pilot archive, that part carries little weight and the value is provisional.
- 2:43
- 2:55
What the model inferred (not said on air): Automatic estimate: a familiar idea (devices acting oddly at a death) with a distinctive detail (six unused alarm clocks going off at one minute, plus a call light), placed near the middle of the scale.
Scoring confidence 0.70 · analysis confidence 0.72 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The writer's firsthand story (faxed letter read on air); No documentation, photograph, or recording presented or examined; No second witness speaking on air. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- An electrical disturbance or power surge could explain several plug-in alarm clocks and a nurse-call light turning on at the same moment. · The letter itself reports another nurse asking [quote withheld] because of the call light.
- Clocks that were set or reset together, or that shared a common time signal, could go off at the same time without any paranormal cause. · The clocks are said to have gone off [quote withheld] on one 30-bed hall.
- Muscle movement or a reflex after death can cause the eyes to open, or the body to sit up or fall back, shortly after death. · The writer names [quote withheld]
What stands out
The story is built around a single minute, 11:07 p.m., that ties together a death, six alarm clocks on a hall where clocks were said not to be used, and a call light in the emptied room. The writer gives an ordinary explanation for the body's movements (involuntary muscle movement) but leaves the clocks and the call light unexplained.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.