Letter from a retired police officer: dead man's arm rises while hands are bagged
A letter read aloud on air, attributed to a self-described retired police officer, describes a single event around 1990. The writer says they were bagging the hands of a robber shot dead by police. As they leaned over the body, the writer says, the dead man's arm lifted straight up at a 90-degree angle. A hospital attendant in the room is said to have reacted at the same time. The letter ends with the writer calling the movement a “dead man's spasm” while calling the timing eerie.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2007.mp3”, starting at 21:08). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The host reads the letter aloud. It comes from a writer who describes themselves as [quote withheld] and who says they have never had a supernatural encounter. According to the letter, around 1990, at night, a robber held up a small Asian bar in a mostly industrial part of a city. A solo patrol officer came upon the scene and confronted the robber on foot in a nearby alley. The robber turned, smiled, crouched, and reached for a gun at his waistband, and the patrolman shot and killed him. The writer says they were working that night and reached the scene within minutes with several other officers. The writer later left for other calls but was sent to the hospital where the body had been taken, to do a follow-up report and secure evidence. The writer describes the room. The robber lay dead and shirtless on a bed, with arms flat and palms up alongside his legs. A hospital attendant was present. The writer held two plastic bags to cover the dead man's hands for gunshot-residue tests. As the writer opened the first bag and leaned over to bag the right hand, the letter states, the dead man's arm lifted straight up at a 90-degree angle, with the elbow still on the bed and the hand pointing at the ceiling. Both the writer and the attendant gasped and stared at each other, and the attendant said something the letter does not repeat. The letter says nothing further happened and that the writer will not embellish. The writer calls it a dead man's spasm, the only one they ever saw. They found the timing “truly eerie” because they were about to reach for that same hand. They add that they figured the man was either cooperating at the end or making one last grab for his gun. The host notes that the letter goes on to name those involved and says he will not relate that.
Reported events, in order
- 0:05
The letter writer identifies themselves as a retired police officer.
- 0:15
Around 1990, at night, a robber holds up a small Asian bar in a mostly industrial area of a city.
- 0:25
A solo patrol officer confronts the robber on foot in a nearby alley. The robber turns, smiles, crouches, and reaches for a gun at his waistband.
- 0:37
The patrolman shoots and kills the robber on the spot.
- 0:49
The writer says they were working that night and were on the scene with several other officers within minutes.
- 1:01
The writer is later sent to the hospital where the body was taken, to do a follow-up report and secure evidence.
- 1:06
The writer describes the robber lying dead and shirtless on a bed, arms flat, palms up alongside his legs.
- 1:14
A hospital attendant is in the room. The writer has two plastic bags to cover the dead man's hands for gunshot-residue testing.
- 1:29
As the writer leans over to bag the right hand, the dead man's arm lifts straight up at a 90-degree angle, elbow still on the bed, hand pointing at the ceiling.
- 1:42
The writer and the attendant gasp and stare at each other. The attendant says something the letter does not repeat.
- 1:52
The letter states that nothing further happened and that the writer will not embellish.
- 1:53
The writer attributes it to a dead man's spasm, the only one they ever saw.
- 2:03
The writer calls the timing eerie because they were about to reach for that same hand.
- 2:09
The writer guesses the man was either cooperating at the end or making one last grab for his gun.
- 2:21
The host notes that the letter goes on to give the names of those involved, which he does not relate.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 1:29
As the writer leaned over the dead robber to bag his right hand, the dead man's arm rose straight up at a 90-degree angle, elbow still on the bed, hand pointing at the ceiling.
- observation· 1:42
The hospital attendant in the room reacted at the same moment as the writer.
- interpretation· 1:53
The writer concludes the arm movement was a spasm after death.
- interpretation· 2:09
The writer also offers a reading that is not physical: the dead man was cooperating, or making a final attempt to reach his gun.
- interpretation· 2:03
The writer found the timing eerie because they were about to reach for that same hand.
- observation· 0:07
The letter writer states they had never had a supernatural encounter or seen a UFO before or since.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a specific, internally coherent, plainly bounded firsthand written story. But it covers a single event whose most obvious cause the writer themselves names, and it has no checkable names, places, or records. That puts it in the upper middle of the scoring guide rather than higher.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand position: [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
- Concrete sensory and procedural detail: a shirtless body, [quote withheld] two plastic bags, and gunshot-residue tests.
- The sequence is ordered and coherent from robbery to shooting to hospital follow-up.
- The writer explicitly limits their claims: [quote withheld] The writer also notes they had never had a supernatural encounter before.
- The only strange event is one movement of a corpse, for which the writer themselves supplies an ordinary bodily explanation: [quote withheld]
- No names, no city, no hospital, and no date beyond “Around 1990.” Nothing in the story can be checked.
- The story reaches the audience through the host reading a letter, so no detail can be tested by questioning the writer.
- The writer's own alternative ([quote withheld]) reads as a way of framing the story, not as a claim that something unseen acted.
- The writer is not on air. The host reads the letter, and it cannot be questioned.
- It is not stated whether the letter is complete as read or was edited by the host.
- 0:05
- 1:10
- 1:52
What the model inferred (not said on air): The component scores are an editorial judgment, not taken from the broadcast: source proximity 22 (direct witness, present in the room), specificity 14 (procedural detail but no verifiable identifiers), internal consistency 17, alternative explanations 3 (a spasm after death fits easily and is conceded), calibration 13 (clear separation of observation from conclusion). The total is 69, reported as 68. No secondhand or joke cap applies because the letter writer is the stated witness.
The story is the writer's word plus a claimed witness who does not speak. Checkable specifics are hinted at but withheld and never verified. This sits in the low band, and nothing is examined or independently confirmed.
Evidence for and against
- The writer's own detailed written story about a procedure they say they performed.
- A second person is claimed to have been present and to have reacted. This is a claimed witness only, not independent confirmation.
- Checkable specifics are hinted at: the names of those involved, and gunshot-residue testing.
- No document, photograph, recording, report, or medical record is presented or examined on air.
- The letter is anonymous. No city, hospital, officer, attendant, or case is named, so nothing is checkable.
- The one item named but withheld ([quote withheld]) is explicitly not read out.
- Whether the letter contains backing documentation is unknown. The host says he is withholding part of it.
- 1:42
- 2:21
What the model inferred (not said on air): Placed in the 11 to 25 band (checkable specifics mentioned but not checked; other witness claimed). Reported as 18. A hard cap of 50 applies and is not approached.
Unsettling rather than frightening. A corpse moves at the exact moment it is being handled, and two people share a startle. There is no menace, no escalation, and no lingering activity.
Evidence for and against
- The disturbance is a dead body moving during a medical or forensic procedure in a hospital room.
- The image is vivid: an arm rising to a 90-degree angle, elbow still on the bed, hand pointed at the ceiling.
- The timing is presented as the disturbing element: [quote withheld]
- A second person is said to have reacted with alarm at the same moment.
- No threat, no harm, and no follow-up activity: “Nothing further happened.”
- The writer supplies an ordinary bodily explanation and treats the matter as the closest they came to something strange, not as an attack.
- The broadcast gives no description of the room, lighting, or atmosphere beyond the procedural details.
- 1:29
- 2:03
What the model inferred (not said on air): A judgment about the story as heard, not about whether it is true. The setting (a hospital room, a dead body) and the near-touch timing raise it above a merely eerie anecdote.
The setup is familiar: a cop, a shooting, a hospital. It carries one genuinely uncommon detail, a precisely angled movement of a dead man's arm at the instant of contact.
Evidence for and against
- The event is unusual for this kind of story: not a figure, sound, or object, but a corpse's arm rising at a precise 90-degree angle during evidence bagging.
- The distinctive element is the timing relative to the officer's reach, which the writer themselves highlights.
- Police and forensic settings and a body that seems to move are familiar story material. The writer closes with a stock bodily explanation.
- Published originality is provisional pending comparison with the rest of the archive. No similarity check is available in this pass.
- 1:29
What the model inferred (not said on air): The automated originality estimate is 55 (familiar setup with a distinctive detail). The comparison with the rest of the archive is provisional here. With a small pilot archive, the published originality stays close to the estimate, so I report 55 and mark it provisional.
Scoring confidence 0.74 · analysis confidence 0.74 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: A letter read aloud on air by the host; the writer's stated firsthand written story.; A second claimed witness (the hospital attendant) who does not speak on air and is not named.; No document, photograph, recording, or record is presented or examined on air.; The letter is said to name those involved in the city, but the host says he will not relate that.. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- Muscle activity after death (a cadaveric spasm or a last reflex) caused the arm to lift. · The writer themselves raises this: [quote withheld] The writer adds that it was the only such spasm they ever saw.
- The arm lifted mechanically, or was triggered, while the body and arm were being moved or handled during the bagging. · The letter places the movement exactly as the officer [quote withheld] that is, while the body was being handled.
What stands out
The strange thing here is not a ghost, figure, or sound but a single, precisely described movement of a corpse. An arm rises to a 90-degree angle at the moment an officer leans in to bag the same hand. The writer supplies the ordinary explanation themselves while still calling the timing eerie.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.