Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 30, 1997 (possible)·Caller's story·2 min·at 2:02:57 in the broadcast

Picture of Jesus falls off a bedroom wall and strikes a girlfriend

A caller who says she is in Honolulu tells Art Bell a brief story. As a teenager, staying at her grandmother’s house, she and her girlfriend were laughing and swearing on a brass bed. A framed picture of Jesus above the bed came off the wall and hit her girlfriend in the head. She says the picture’s wire was unbroken and the nail was set at an angle, and that they stopped laughing immediately. The host then raises the idea of “teenage girls' energy,” and the caller moves on to a second, unrelated story.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.90
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 1:34
Play
0:17 · The caller says that as a teenager she and her girlfriend were staying at her grandmother’s house, where the bedroom held a gold-gilded picture of Jesus on the mount, hanging above a brass bed.0:38 · The two girls lay on the bed joking, calling each other names, and increasingly using swear words.0:58 · The picture of Jesus came off the wall and struck the girlfriend in the head.1:16 · The caller says they examined the picture and found the hanging wire intact and the nail at an angle. She says it would have had to jump up to come off.1:30 · The caller says they immediately stopped laughing.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1997.mp3”, starting at 2:02:57). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller answers the host’s question by saying she is in Honolulu. She introduces her contribution as [quote withheld] and calls the first one “kind of funny.” She says that when she was a teenager, she and her girlfriend were staying at her grandmother’s house. The bedroom had a gold-gilded picture of Jesus on the mount, hanging above a bed with a brass headboard and footboard. She says the two of them lay on the bed joking and calling each other names. The name-calling escalated until they [quote withheld] and laughing. According to the caller, the picture of Jesus then [quote withheld] She says they examined it and found the hanging wire intact and the nail at an angle. She says that would have required the picture to move upward to come off the nail. With no further questions from the host, she says they stopped laughing immediately. The host responds that there are many such stories about teenage girls and that they have [quote withheld] He adds that he does not see how one could get a clearer message. The caller agrees briefly (“Okay. Yeah. Yeah”) and then begins a second, separate story about a feeling of a presence in her apartment two months earlier. That falls outside this story.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:17

    The caller says that as a teenager she and her girlfriend were staying at her grandmother’s house, where the bedroom held a gold-gilded picture of Jesus on the mount, hanging above a brass bed.

  2. 0:38

    The two girls lay on the bed joking, calling each other names, and increasingly using swear words.

  3. 0:58

    The picture of Jesus came off the wall and struck the girlfriend in the head.

  4. 1:16

    The caller says they examined the picture and found the hanging wire intact and the nail at an angle. She says it would have had to jump up to come off.

  5. 1:30

    The caller says they immediately stopped laughing.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:58

    A framed picture of Jesus on the mount came off the wall by itself and struck the caller’s girlfriend on the head.

  • observation· 1:16

    After the fall, the hanging wire was intact and the nail was at an angle. The caller says that would have required the picture to move upward to leave the nail.

  • interpretation· 1:16

    The caller concludes that the picture could not simply have slipped off the angled nail.

  • host statement· 1:10

    The host asserts that adolescent girls generate an energy or power that causes things to happen around them.

  • host statement· 1:27

    The host asserts the event was an unmistakable message.

  • hearsay· 0:58

    The girlfriend was reportedly present on the bed and was the person struck. She does not speak on air.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
55

A short but consistent firsthand story with some concrete detail and a clearly flagged inference. It is scored toward the middle because an ordinary cause (an angled nail plus movement on the bed) fits easily and nothing can be checked independently.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand report of something the caller says she personally witnessed ([quote withheld]).
  • Concrete detail from home: a gold-gilded picture of Jesus above a brass bed in the grandmother’s bedroom.
  • The caller separates what she saw from what she concluded. She reports the intact wire and angled nail and then adds her own inference ([quote withheld]).
  • The sequence is coherent and answers the host’s framing without contradiction.
Against
  • A simple physical cause is readily available. The caller herself notes the nail was at an angle ([quote withheld]), and a frame on an angled nail can slip or be levered off.
  • Two people moving and laughing on a brass bed ([quote withheld]) are a plausible source of vibration or contact.
  • No names, no date, and no location beyond “my grandma's house.” Nothing in the story can be checked.
Uncertain or missing
  • No date or decade is given for the teenage event.
  • The caller opens by calling the story “kind of funny.” I read this as describing the tone of the story rather than presenting it as fiction, but the framing is ambiguous.
  • The labels showing who is speaking shift within what appears to be one caller.
Passages cited
  • 0:17
  • 1:16
  • 0:38

What the model inferred (not said on air): The component weights are mine. The details cited come from the transcript. I am not treating the host’s enthusiasm or the caller’s laughter as evidence in either direction.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
12

There is nothing beyond the caller’s own word, plus a claimed but silent second witness and physical details that were not produced. This sits at the low end of the 11 to 25 range.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A specific claimed second witness ([quote withheld]), claimed rather than independent confirmation.
  • Physical details that could in principle be inspected (an intact wire, an angled nail) are described but not produced.
Against
  • No photograph, document, or recording is offered or examined.
  • No checkable names, dates, or addresses. The grandmother’s house is not located.
  • The claimed second witness does not speak on air.
Uncertain or missing
  • It is not stated whether the picture or nail still exist or could be inspected.
Passages cited
  • 1:16

What the model inferred (not said on air): Treating the girlfriend’s presence as a claimed witness rather than backing from someone else follows the scoring guide.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
22

A single startling fall of an object in a bedroom, without threat, rising tension, or lasting dread, and framed by the caller as amusing. Mildly eerie at most.

Evidence for and against
For
  • An object in a bedroom leaves the wall and strikes a person on the head.
  • The caller says the laughter stopped immediately, which suggests the moment felt significant ([quote withheld]).
  • The host frames it as an unmistakable rebuke ([quote withheld]).
Against
  • The caller frames it as a short, humorous story ([quote withheld]).
  • Only one brief event, with no repetition, no threat, and no lingering presence.
  • No description of a figure, sound, or atmosphere.
Uncertain or missing
  • No description is given of the impact or of the girlfriend’s reaction.
Passages cited
  • 0:58
  • 1:30

What the model inferred (not said on air): The host’s reading of a “message” is not treated as raising the score, per the scoring guide on host reactions.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
57

A familiar frame (an object falls off a wall) with one distinctive detail: the intact wire and angled nail, offered as evidence against a simple fall. This is a provisional model score, before any comparison with the rest of the archive.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A specific detail: the falling object is a gold-gilded picture of Jesus on the mount, above the bed it falls onto.
  • The caller’s own report that the wire was intact and the nail angled, which is an outright claim that a simple fall is unlikely.
Against
  • A picture falling from a wall is a common report of a strange event at home.
  • The [quote withheld] beat is a familiar religious-story frame.
Uncertain or missing
  • Novelty compared with the rest of the archive was not computed for this pilot analysis.
Passages cited
  • 0:17
  • 1:16

What the model inferred (not said on air): How rare this theme is in the archive cannot be computed here. The comparison with the archive carries little weight in the pilot.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.72 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story (brief).; One claimed second witness (the girlfriend), who does not speak on air.; No photograph, document, recording, or physical trace offered or examined.. The originality score blends the model's score (45) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • The picture slipped or was levered off the angled nail for physical reasons. · The caller says the supporting nail was at an angle. A frame hung on an angled nail can slide or be levered off its nail rather than needing an upward jump.
  • Movement of the girls on the brass bed knocked the frame loose. · The caller says both girls were lying on a brass bed, laughing and moving. Vibration or contact with the headboard or footboard could knock a loosely hung picture loose.

What stands out

The standout feature is not the fall itself but the caller’s added physical detail: the hanging wire was unbroken and the nail set at an angle. She offers this as the reason she thinks the picture could not simply have slipped. Otherwise it is a very short story from home, told as one of two by the same caller.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.