Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 28, 1994 (probable)·Caller's story·35 s·at 37:12 in the broadcast

Caller says devil poster in mother's room tore itself apart after prayer

The caller tells of a four-foot “mod poster” of the devil that belonged to their mother in the early 1970s. The caller says they would not go into their mother's room, asked God to take the poster away, and within three weeks it had torn itself apart. The host thanks the caller and moves on.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.70
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 0:35
Play
0:08 · The caller says their mother had a four-foot “mod poster” of the devil in the early 1970s.0:20 · The caller says they would not go into their mother's room because of the poster.0:25 · The caller says they asked God to take away the poster.0:25 · The caller says that within three weeks the poster had torn itself apart.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1994.mp3”, starting at 37:12). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller says, “I believe that,” then introduces [quote withheld] The caller says their mother had [quote withheld] and says, [quote withheld] The caller describes the poster as [quote withheld] and says, [quote withheld] The caller then says, [quote withheld] The host breaks in with “Okay, very quickly,” and after the caller finishes, says, [quote withheld] The caller does not describe how the poster tore, whether they saw it tear, or any further details about the event.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:08

    The caller says their mother had a four-foot “mod poster” of the devil in the early 1970s.

  2. 0:20

    The caller says they would not go into their mother's room because of the poster.

  3. 0:25

    The caller says they asked God to take away the poster.

  4. 0:25

    The caller says that within three weeks the poster had torn itself apart.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:25

    The caller says the poster tore itself apart within three weeks after they asked God to take it away.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
56

The story is firsthand but brief, with some specific details (the poster's size, the years). Ordinary explanations (the poster wearing out, someone tearing it) fit easily, and the caller does not hedge or acknowledge other possibilities. The story is internally consistent.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Specific details: “four-foot mod poster,” [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] The caller is a firsthand witness to the poster and its torn state.
Against
  • The caller did not see the tearing, only the result after three weeks. The story is very short. Ordinary explanations come easily. No one else backs it up.
Uncertain or missing
  • The timeline is vague (“within three weeks”). How the poster tore is not described.
Passages cited
  • 0:08
  • 0:14
  • 0:25

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score balances specific firsthand details against easy ordinary explanations and the caller's lack of hedging.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
5

The story rests only on the caller's word. No physical evidence is presented or examined, no other witnesses speak, and no checkable records are mentioned.

Evidence for and against
Against
  • No names, no location, no documents. No second witness.
Uncertain or missing
  • The poster itself is not available for examination.
Passages cited
  • 0:25

What the model inferred (not said on air): The evidence score is at the bottom of the scale because this is a single claim that has not been checked.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
25

A devil poster tearing itself apart after prayer is mildly eerie, but there is no threat or direct confrontation, and the event is described after the fact without lasting dread.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The poster is [quote withheld] and the caller [quote withheld] which suggests some fear.
Against
  • No physical contact, no threat, no escalation, and the event is resolved.
Uncertain or missing
  • The emotional impact is not described in detail.
Passages cited
  • 0:20

What the model inferred (not said on air): The creepiness is judged low to moderate. It rests on the unsettling image and the supernatural tearing but is softened by the brief, matter-of-fact delivery.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
66

The core motif, an object tearing itself apart after prayer, is somewhat unusual, and the detail of a “four-foot mod poster” of the devil sets it apart further. But the story's structure is simple and brief.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The combination of a mod poster, a devil image, and prayer leading to destruction is not a stock ghost-story element.
Against
  • The general theme of prayer causing supernatural change is familiar.
Uncertain or missing
  • The story's very short length makes originality hard to judge.
Passages cited
  • 0:25

What the model inferred (not said on air): A provisional automated score; originality compared with the rest of the archive will be computed later.

Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.60 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller's firsthand story only. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • The poster may have worn out naturally over three weeks because of conditions in the room or poor adhesion, causing it to tear or fall apart. · The caller says the poster [quote withheld] after three weeks, a time frame that fits the material gradually giving way.
  • A person or animal in the household may have torn the poster. · The caller does not report seeing the tearing, only its result afterward.

What stands out

The story is unusually brief and centers on an object (a poster) rather than a figure or presence. The detail of a “four-foot mod poster” of the devil, combined with a prayer leading to its destruction, is distinctive.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.