Fragment: Prayer to cast an unwanted presence out of a room
An unidentified caller describes, in a fragment, an intense and tense experience in their room. The caller says they prayed to Jesus and the Lord to cast “whatever it was” out. They say it took [quote withheld] with no unit given, but felt like an hour. The host adds that it smelled really bad. He dubs it [quote withheld] says it hovered over the caller and was foul, and asks what these things are.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 1998.mp3”, starting at 3:42:23). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The story opens mid-sentence with an unidentified caller describing something that was “so intense tense” and saying they could not believe it was happening to them. The caller compares their experience to [quote withheld] The caller then says that was not their case. They [quote withheld] and asked them to cast “whatever it was” out of their room. The caller says this took [quote withheld] with no unit given, but [quote withheld] The host interjects that [quote withheld] Then he says he will dub it [quote withheld] The host adds that [quote withheld] He calls it “actually scary stuff” and asks twice, [quote withheld] The fragment has no description of what the presence looked like, no location beyond “my room,” no date, no other witness, and no statement of what happened after the prayer. The beginning and ending of the story are missing.
Reported events, in order
- 0:00
The caller says an experience was very intense and tense and that they could not believe it was happening to them.
- 0:09
The caller says they prayed to Jesus and the Lord and asked them to cast whatever it was out of their room.
- 0:23
The caller says the casting out took no longer than 10, with no unit given, but felt like an hour.
- 0:24
The host interjects that it smelled really bad.
- 0:28
The host says he will dub it [quote withheld]
- 0:33
The host states that it hovered over the caller and was foul.
- 0:41
The host calls the story scary and asks what these things are.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· 0:00
The caller says the experience was very intense and tense and that they could not believe it was happening to them.
- observation· 0:09
The caller says they prayed to Jesus and the Lord and asked them to cast whatever it was out of their room.
- hearsay· 0:09
The caller contrasts their experience with a previous caller who prayed to Jesus and nothing happened, saying that was not their case.
- observation· 0:23
The caller says the casting out took no longer than 10, with no unit given, but felt like an hour.
- interpretation· 0:09
The caller refers to the cause only as “whatever it was” and asks for it to be cast out. That suggests an unwanted outside presence, but the caller does not say what it was.
- host statement· 0:24
The host states that it smelled very bad.
- host statement· 0:28
The host says he will dub it [quote withheld]
- host statement· 0:33
The host states that it hovered over the caller and was foul.
- host statement· 0:41
The host calls the story scary and asks what these things are.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a firsthand but very short fragment with almost nothing that can be checked, so it is capped at 40 as too short to assess. It is consistent on its own terms, but the missing beginning and the host-dominated ending limit confidence.
Evidence for and against
- The caller gives a firsthand sequence: intense feeling, prayer to Jesus and the Lord, a request to cast it out, and how long it took.
- The caller sets their experience apart from another caller’s reported failure of prayer.
- No statement of when, where, what, who else was present, or what happened after the prayer.
- The host, not the caller, supplies the foul smell and the hovering.
- The story is incomplete and has nothing checkable.
- The labels showing who is speaking may be unreliable.
- The unit of “10” is not given.
- Because the start is missing, the caller’s full claim cannot be judged.
- 0:00
- 0:09
What the model inferred (not said on air): Closeness to the source would ordinarily score high for a firsthand witness, but the fragment is so short and has so little concrete detail that the score is lower.
The only evidence is the caller’s word, with nothing checkable and no backing from anyone else. This places the score in the lowest range.
Evidence for and against
- The story consists only of the caller’s word and the host’s retelling.
- No names, dates, places, or records are given that could be checked.
- No physical evidence, recording, photograph, document, or mark is claimed.
- No second witness speaks on air to confirm the event.
- The host’s statements are commentary, not independent verification.
- The host may be repeating details the caller gave earlier, but those details are not in this part of the broadcast.
- 0:09
- 0:33
What the model inferred (not said on air): Because nothing in this part of the broadcast can be independently verified, the evidence score cannot rise above the lowest range.
A foul-smelling presence hovering over the caller, and a prayer to cast it out, is moderately unsettling. But the fragment has no threat, harm, or growing dread. The host’s joking tone lowers the creepiness further.
Evidence for and against
- The host describes a foul-smelling presence that hovered over the caller.
- The caller describes the experience as intense and tense.
- The prayer to cast it out suggests an unwanted presence.
- No threat, physical harm, or lasting dread is reported.
- The host’s joking label “mr hinky monster” lightens the tone.
- The fragment is very short.
- In this part of the broadcast, the smell and hovering come from the host, not the caller.
- 0:24
- 0:33
What the model inferred (not said on air): A listener would likely find the foul smell and hovering presence eerie, but not extremely frightening, given how short the fragment is and how little detail it has.
The story uses a familiar setup: an unwanted presence, a foul smell, and prayer as a way to remove it. The fragment is too brief to show an unusual structure or rare motifs, so the model’s score is moderate and provisional.
Evidence for and against
- The specific image of a foul-smelling presence hovering over the caller before being cast out by prayer is a distinctive combination.
- The fragment is too broken up to have much shape as a story.
- Prayer stopping a presence is a familiar ghost-story motif.
- A foul-smelling presence is a common sensory detail in haunting stories.
- The very short fragment limits any judgment of originality.
- 0:09
- 0:33
What the model inferred (not said on air): The published originality score, compared with the rest of the archive, is not computed here. This is a provisional judgment by the model.
Scoring confidence 0.35 · analysis confidence 0.45 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand word, but only a fragment.; The host’s summary remarks about smell and hovering, not independent evidence.. The originality score blends the model's score (40) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- A foul odor from an ordinary source, such as gas, mold, sewage, or an animal, could produce a bad smell in a room and heighten alarm if no source was found. · The host says [quote withheld] and [quote withheld]
- An experience while falling asleep or waking up in a room could produce a sense of a presence, intense fear, and a stretched sense of time. · The caller refers to “my room” and says the experience was “so intense tense” and [quote withheld]
- Hearing another caller’s story about prayer could shape how this caller understood an intense experience in a room. · The caller compares themselves with [quote withheld]
What stands out
The surviving story is unusually sparse and dominated by the host’s summary. The caller describes only an intense, tense experience and a prayer to cast something out. The host supplies the foul smell and the hovering. The fragment lacks the beginning and end of the caller’s story.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.