Caller says they were haunted by a dead cheerleader during Air Force training
Calling on the KFI Los Angeles line and giving their name as [name withheld], the caller says they have been haunted by the ghost of a dead cheerleader. The caller says she was murdered by a photographer later convicted of the killing. The caller reports that she haunted them in 1973 while they were in the Air Force. The haunting led to an incident in formation when they found themself wearing a cheerleader outfit with pom-poms. The caller adds that Brigadier General Chuck Yeager later interviewed them about it. The host rejects the story outright and moves to the next caller.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2001-1.mp3”, starting at 23:13). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
Calling on the KFI line in Los Angeles and giving their name as [name withheld], the caller says they have been haunted by the ghost of a dead cheerleader. The caller says she died quite recently, murdered by a photographer who was “sentenced and convicted” for the killing, and that they had met her five years previously. The caller states that she haunted them in 1973 while they were in the Air Force. According to the caller, they were in a formation of several thousand men going to tech school when [quote withheld] All the senior NCOs and officers came up to look at him, and he was standing there [quote withheld] while the airman behind him rubbed his behind. After that, they say, their life was “a living heck” and they could not understand it. The caller adds that their commanding officer’s former commanding officer was Brigadier General Chuck Yeager, and that Yeager came down to interview them because he had heard about it. The caller places this around [quote withheld] and mentions a person they call Colonel Fox of Kingsway. Asked by the host how any of this continued, they say simply that “everybody saw one.” The host is openly skeptical throughout. He says that such an outfit in boot camp would have been “a ticket home,” that interviewing someone who had done this [quote withheld] Yeager’s list, and finally [quote withheld] The story ends there, and the host takes the next caller.
Reported events, in order
- 0:05
The caller, who gives their name as [name withheld], says they have been haunted by the ghost of a dead cheerleader.
- 0:19
The caller says she died recently, murdered by a photographer who was convicted and sentenced for the killing.
- 0:36
The caller says they had met her five years before the haunting.
- 0:42
The caller says she haunted them in 1973 when they were in the Air Force.
- 0:49
The caller describes being in a formation of several thousand men going to tech school.
- 0:53
The caller says the entire formation was suddenly called to a halt.
- 0:57
He says NCOs and officers came up to look at him, and he was wearing a cheerleader outfit with pom-poms while the airman behind him rubbed his behind.
- 1:10
The caller says their life was “a living heck” afterward and they could not understand it.
- 1:53
The caller says their commanding officer’s former commanding officer was Brigadier General Chuck Yeager.
- 2:01
The caller says Yeager came down to interview them because he had heard about it.
- 2:15
The caller places the events around the time of [quote withheld] and mentions Colonel Fox of Kingsway.
- 2:35
The host says he does not believe the story and moves to the next caller.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- interpretation· 0:05
The caller says they have been haunted by the ghost of a dead cheerleader they had met.
- hearsay· 0:19
The caller says the cheerleader was murdered by a photographer who was convicted and sentenced. The caller does not say how they learned this.
- observation· 0:57
The caller says the formation of several thousand was halted and that he was standing in a cheerleader outfit while the airman behind him rubbed his behind.
- interpretation· 1:10
The caller says their life was “a living heck” after the incident.
- observation· 2:01
The caller says Brigadier General Chuck Yeager came down to interview them because he had heard about it.
- host statement· 2:35
The host says the story is not believable, citing boot camp practice and Yeager’s likely priorities.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a brief firsthand story with some concrete particulars (year, service, a named general). But the telling is confused and has an obvious ordinary framing, and the caller makes no distinction between what they perceived and what they concluded.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand: the caller places themself in the events ([quote withheld]).
- Concrete anchor points: 1973, Air Force, tech school, formation.
- The caller names a figure who can be checked: [quote withheld]
- What the caller describes is not a paranormal event anyone could perceive: [quote withheld]
- The caller does not say how they learned the murder and conviction detail.
- The host explicitly rejects the story: [quote withheld]
- The story is fragmentary and mixed with host commentary, making the sequence hard to reconstruct.
- No time frame for the killing relative to the haunting is given beyond “quite recently.”
- 0:36
- 0:53
- 2:15
What the model inferred (not said on air): Component judgment: source proximity 14 (firsthand but partial and brief); specificity 9; internal consistency 6 (the haunting claim and the outfit episode do not fit together); alternative explanations 4 (a prank or tall-tale reading fits easily); calibration 3. Total 36. This is an editorial score, not a probability.
The story rests entirely on the caller’s word. There is no documentation, no object examined, and no second witness speaking on air, only a few names and a year that could in principle be checked.
Evidence for and against
- Specifics that could be checked are named: 1973, the Air Force, tech school, Brigadier General Chuck Yeager.
- The caller claims many people were present at the formation incident.
- No photograph, recording, or document is offered or examined.
- No other person speaks on air to confirm anything.
- Nobody present is named, and no record is cited for the reported murder and conviction.
- None of the names or the 1973 detail has been checked. No outside check was done.
- [quote withheld] is partly unintelligible.
- 0:57
- 1:53
What the model inferred (not said on air): Named people and a year put this at a score of 11 to 25 ([quote withheld]). It is scored low within that range because the specifics relate to the setting rather than to the claimed haunting.
There is no threat, intrusion, or lasting dread in the story as told. It is absurd rather than frightening, and the host’s response frames it as not believable.
Evidence for and against
- The caller says their life afterward was “a living heck,” the only bad result reported.
- The central event is a formation halted over a cheerleader outfit, which reads as comic.
- The host dismisses it rather than reacting with alarm.
- No figure, contact, or bedroom or bedside element is described.
- The caller’s story is cut off before it is finished, so anything that might have followed is unknown.
- 1:10
What the model inferred (not said on air): Scored near the “mildly eerie” floor but below it, because the story is closer to comedy than horror. This is a judgment about the story, not its truth.
A familiar haunting frame carrying a distinctive and unusual detail: what appears is the caller themself, abruptly wearing a cheerleader outfit in a halted military formation. That is not a stock ghost motif.
Evidence for and against
- What the caller describes, the formation halting because of the caller’s reported outfit, is uncommon.
- A named historical figure (Chuck Yeager) is introduced as an interviewer, an unusual element in a story like this.
- The underlying frame, being haunted by the ghost of a murdered young woman, is a common one.
- The story is too brief to develop any of its distinctive elements.
- The published originality score is worked out automatically compared with this archive. The value above is only the estimate from the content and should be treated as provisional.
- 0:57
What the model inferred (not said on air): This is placed above the “stock elements only” mark because of the outfit detail, but well below “rare combination” because the haunting frame itself is commonplace.
Scoring confidence 0.35 · analysis confidence 0.50 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story (live caller); The host’s on-air statements of skepticism; No physical evidence offered or examined; No second witness speaks on air. The originality score blends the model's score (60) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- As told, the story reads as a prank or a barracks tall tale told on air rather than a report of something perceived. It describes no sighting, sound, or physical effect that could be pinned on something unseen. · The content: a formation of several thousand halting to reveal the caller in a cheerleader outfit. Also the host’s immediate dismissal: [quote withheld] The caller does not say it is a joke.
- Timeline details may be mixed up or imprecise, since the caller places the meeting “five years previously” and ties it to a 1973 event, and refers loosely to [quote withheld] · The caller’s own statements about the timing.
What stands out
The story is framed as a haunting, but what the caller describes is not a ghost, a sound, or a physical effect. The caller reports abruptly appearing in a cheerleader outfit in the middle of a military formation. The host’s on-air rejection of the story is unusually direct for this part of the broadcast.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.