Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2003 (probable)·Caller's story·5 min·at 1:21:57 in the broadcast

Deceased father appears in a truck and warns of coming events

A caller who gives their name as [quote withheld] tells Art Bell that their father, who died on January 31, 1981, later appeared beside them in their truck on a rural back road and warned them of coming hardships. The caller says they heard the voice first. Then they saw a translucent, bluish-gray figure in the passenger seat, which vanished at the pond near their house. The caller says the predicted events later happened: their mother’s death, a layoff, and a divorce.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.75
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 5:29
Play
0:22 · [name withheld] says their father was [quote withheld] and died on January 31, 1981.0:31 · About two months later the caller has a vivid dream in which they tell their father he has died. The father says he can come back whenever needed.0:57 · About ten years later, feeling depressed, the caller reports a persistent feeling that someone is tapping their shoulder and trying to tell them something.1:07 · The caller is driving home from second shift at about three o’clock in the morning, going about 100 mph on a back road in the middle of nowhere.1:23 · The caller lets go of the steering wheel, throws their hands up, and says “what.”1:40 · The caller notes that they happened to be passing an old cemetery at that moment.1:52 · The caller feels an intense “overload” sensation, and the hair stands up on the back of their neck.2:23 · The caller hears their father’s voice begin speaking, saying he wants to prepare them for coming events.2:34 · The father predicts the caller’s mother’s illness and death, a layoff, and a divorce.3:11 · The caller looks to their right and sees their father sitting in the passenger seat, translucent and bluish-gray.3:41 · Questions are answered before the caller asks them. The caller likens it to downloading information.3:57 · The caller’s father suggests going to the old house’s garage to build a wood fire.4:12 · At the pond in front of the house, the father vanishes instantly.4:18 · The caller’s wife runs out asking if the caller is all right. She reports a bright white light above the truck that vanished at the pond.4:47 · The caller tells her it was not a UFO but “Dad.”4:57 · The caller says their mother died and they were laid off a few years later, and they were divorced nine years later.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2003.mp3”, starting at 1:21:57). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

The caller, who gives their name as [quote withheld] tells Art Bell their father [quote withheld] and [quote withheld] About two months after the death, [name withheld] says, they had a vivid dream. In it they told their father he had died, and the father replied that he [quote withheld] Roughly ten years later they were feeling depressed over “silly stuff.” The caller says they had a constant feeling that someone was tapping them on the shoulder and trying to tell them something. They were driving home from a second shift at about three o’clock in the morning, going about 100 miles an hour on a back road [quote withheld] The caller says they let go of the steering wheel, threw their hands up, and said “what.” The caller notes that they were passing an old cemetery at the time. The caller then describes an intense overload sensation and hair standing up on their neck. The caller says they heard their father’s voice telling them he wanted to prepare them for coming events: their mother would get sick and die, they would be laid off, and they would divorce. The caller says they looked to their right and saw their father sitting in the passenger seat, “just like him” but translucent and bluish-gray, and clearer out of the corner of their eye. Questions were answered before they asked them, the caller says, [quote withheld] The father suggested going to the old house’s garage to build a wood fire. At the pond in front of the house, the father vanished instantly. The caller’s wife ran out asking if they were all right. She reported a bright white light above the truck that disappeared at the pond. [name withheld] says they told her [quote withheld] The caller says their mother died and they were laid off a few years later, and they were divorced nine years later.

Reported events, in order

  1. 0:22

    [name withheld] says their father was [quote withheld] and died on January 31, 1981.

  2. 0:31

    About two months later the caller has a vivid dream in which they tell their father he has died. The father says he can come back whenever needed.

  3. 0:57

    About ten years later, feeling depressed, the caller reports a persistent feeling that someone is tapping their shoulder and trying to tell them something.

  4. 1:07

    The caller is driving home from second shift at about three o’clock in the morning, going about 100 mph on a back road in the middle of nowhere.

  5. 1:23

    The caller lets go of the steering wheel, throws their hands up, and says “what.”

  6. 1:40

    The caller notes that they happened to be passing an old cemetery at that moment.

  7. 1:52

    The caller feels an intense “overload” sensation, and the hair stands up on the back of their neck.

  8. 2:23

    The caller hears their father’s voice begin speaking, saying he wants to prepare them for coming events.

  9. 2:34

    The father predicts the caller’s mother’s illness and death, a layoff, and a divorce.

  10. 3:11

    The caller looks to their right and sees their father sitting in the passenger seat, translucent and bluish-gray.

  11. 3:41

    Questions are answered before the caller asks them. The caller likens it to downloading information.

  12. 3:57

    The caller’s father suggests going to the old house’s garage to build a wood fire.

  13. 4:12

    At the pond in front of the house, the father vanishes instantly.

  14. 4:18

    The caller’s wife runs out asking if the caller is all right. She reports a bright white light above the truck that vanished at the pond.

  15. 4:47

    The caller tells her it was not a UFO but “Dad.”

  16. 4:57

    The caller says their mother died and they were laid off a few years later, and they were divorced nine years later.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:37

    In a vivid dream about two months after their father’s death, the caller told their father he had died, and the father said he could come back whenever needed.

  • observation· 2:23

    While driving, the caller heard their father’s voice telling them to prepare for coming events, including their mother’s illness and death, a layoff, and a divorce.

  • observation· 3:11

    The caller looked to their right and saw their father sitting in the passenger seat, translucent and bluish-gray, and clearer out of the corner of their eye.

  • observation· 3:41

    Questions were answered before the caller asked them, which the caller describes as downloading information.

  • hearsay· 4:32

    The caller’s wife reported a bright white light above the top of the caller’s truck the whole time they came down the gravel road. It disappeared when they reached the pond.

  • interpretation· 4:47

    The caller told their wife the light was not a UFO but their father.

  • interpretation· 4:57

    The events their father foretold, their mother’s death, a layoff, and a divorce, later happened.

  • host statement· 4:50

    The host observes that the caller referred to their “former wife,” implying the predicted divorce came true.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
62

This is a detailed firsthand story that holds together in sequence and has concrete specifics. But the encounter happened late at night, during high-speed driving after a second shift while the caller was depressed. Ordinary explanations could fit that state, and the caller does not address them.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand story with a stated date: [quote withheld]
  • Concrete sequence and setting: second shift, three o’clock in the morning, back road, gravel road, pond.
  • The caller separates what they perceived from what they concluded. They say they are “not really conscious” of grabbing the wheel, and that the figure is clearer out of the corner of their eye.
Against
  • An alternative explanation the caller does not address: fatigue and drowsiness during a late-night drive at about 100 mph.
  • The predictions are broad life events (illness, layoff, divorce) reported as happening years apart.
  • The labels showing who is speaking shift during the call, so part of the dialogue attribution is uncertain.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether the predicted events were stated before they happened or reconstructed afterward.
Passages cited
  • 0:22
  • 1:12

What the model inferred (not said on air): The scoring assumes the caller is speaking in their own voice as a firsthand witness. The ordinary-explanation point is my own addition, not something the caller raised.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
18

There is only the caller’s assertion, plus specifics that could be checked but were not (name, state, date of death) and a second witness who is claimed but does not speak on air.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A named caller and location: [quote withheld]
  • A stated date for the father’s death: [quote withheld]
  • A claimed second witness: the wife is quoted as reporting a bright white light.
Against
  • No documentation, photograph, recording, or record is presented.
  • The second witness does not speak on air. The light is reported only through the caller.
Uncertain or missing
  • None of the specifics that could be checked are verified in this part of the broadcast.
Passages cited
  • 0:05
  • 4:32

What the model inferred (not said on air): The wife’s claimed sighting is treated as a claim, not as independent backing, under the scoring guide. No outside check was done.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
45

The story is unsettling rather than frightening. A dead father appears inside a vehicle at night with ominous predictions that are said to have come true. But there is no threat, harm, or hostile being.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A translucent, bluish-gray figure appears in the passenger seat beside the driver.
  • Predictions of the mother’s death, a layoff, and a divorce.
  • The figure vanishes instantly at the pond.
Against
  • The encounter is described as a warning from a loved one, not as hostile.
  • No physical harm or attack is reported.
Uncertain or missing
  • The mood of the encounter is largely unstated in the transcript.
Passages cited
  • 3:19
  • 2:34

What the model inferred (not said on air): Creepiness is judged on the story as heard, not on whether it is true.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
58

A dead relative returning with a warning is a familiar theme. But the combination of a passenger-seat figure at high speed, answers given before the questions, and a wife’s report of a light above the truck is distinctive.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The father appears seated in the passenger seat of a moving truck.
  • Questions are reportedly answered before they are asked, likened to downloading.
  • The wife reportedly saw a white light above the truck that vanished at the pond.
Against
  • Warnings from dead relatives and translucent figures are common ghost-story elements.
Uncertain or missing
  • Originality is a provisional estimate based on this part of the broadcast only.
Passages cited
  • 3:41
  • 4:34

What the model inferred (not said on air): The score reflects the distinctive combination of themes. It is not a measure compared with the rest of the archive.

Scoring confidence 0.70 · analysis confidence 0.72 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story; A claimed second witness (the wife) who does not speak on air; No documentation, photograph, or recording presented.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • Fatigue, drowsiness, or imagery from the edge of sleep during a late-night drive after a second shift. · The caller says they worked second shift and were driving at about three o’clock in the morning at roughly 100 mph while feeling depressed. Vivid imagery can occur in that state.
  • The light the wife reported could have an ordinary source in the sky or air, which she interpreted in a frame ready to consider a UFO. · She is quoted as saying she [quote withheld] which shows a UFO explanation was available to her.
  • Broad life events (illness, job loss, divorce) over a decade may have been matched to the predictions after the fact. · The predictions are general life events, and the caller reports them as having happened [quote withheld] and “nine years later.”

What stands out

The caller says this happened while they were driving at high speed. Their dead father sat in the passenger seat and answered questions before they were asked. The caller’s wife also reported a bright white light above the truck that vanished at the pond. The caller did not see that light themselves.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.