Skip to content
DRAFT ARCHIVE · every story is an AI draft not yet checked by a personHow they are made →
October 31, 2003 (probable)·Caller's story·56 s·at 2:18:40 in the broadcast

Fading runner and a woman who vanishes from the back seat on the highway

A caller to Ghost to Ghost AM says that while driving home there was “always a runner” on the highway who faded away when greeted. The caller also describes a “beautiful blonde gal” who walked the highway, got into the back seat of the car, and then faded out. No name, place, date, or explanation is given for either figure. The host responds that such hitchhiker stories are said to be common in Oregon. The call ends as he takes the next one.

Story statusAI draft, not yet checked
Start and end pointsNot yet checked · confidence 0.60
How it was toldFirsthand · Live call
0:00 / 0:55
Play
-1:-1:-1 · The caller says that while driving home there was always a runner on the highway.0:09 · The caller says you could slow down, come up next to the runner, greet him, and he would fade away.0:18 · The caller says a beautiful blonde woman would always be walking the highway.0:24 · The caller says that if you stopped for her, she would get into the back seat and fade out as you drove off.0:29 · The host says such stories are rife in Oregon and that Oregon is famous for hitchhikers who suddenly disappear.
clip start● reported events: click one to jump thereclip end

This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2003.mp3”, starting at 2:18:40). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.

The story as told

In this brief exchange, the automatic transcript labels most of the caller’s story as the host, although the content is clearly the caller’s. The caller says that while driving home there was “always a runner” along the highway. The caller says you could slow down, pull up next to the runner, look at him, and say hello, and he would fade away. The host repeats back [quote withheld] and the reply is “On the highway.” The caller then describes a “beautiful blonde gal” who would [quote withheld] If you stopped for her, she would get into the back seat, and as you drove off she would fade out. One line containing the words [quote withheld] is garbled and cannot be reliably interpreted. No name, town, highway, date, or time of day is given for either figure. The caller offers no explanation of what the runner or the woman was. The host then says these stories are “rife in Oregon.” He says Oregon is famous for hitchhikers who suddenly disappear, and that some hitchhikers tell drivers about coming Armageddon before vanishing. This part of the broadcast ends as the host answers the next caller, who introduces themselves as Jerry.

Reported events, in order

  1. -1:-1:-1

    The caller says that while driving home there was always a runner on the highway.

  2. 0:09

    The caller says you could slow down, come up next to the runner, greet him, and he would fade away.

  3. 0:18

    The caller says a beautiful blonde woman would always be walking the highway.

  4. 0:24

    The caller says that if you stopped for her, she would get into the back seat and fade out as you drove off.

  5. 0:29

    The host says such stories are rife in Oregon and that Oregon is famous for hitchhikers who suddenly disappear.

Claims

Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).

  • observation· 0:06

    The caller reports that a runner was regularly on the highway when they drove home.

  • observation· 0:12

    The caller reports that greeting the runner caused him to fade away.

  • observation· 0:24

    The caller reports that a blonde woman walking the highway would get into the back seat of the car and fade out.

  • host statement· 0:34

    The host says these hitchhiker stories are common in Oregon.

  • host statement· 0:41

    The host says some hitchhikers tell drivers about coming Armageddon and then disappear.

Scores, with reasons

An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.

Believability
A rough guide to how credible the story is as told
38

The story is firsthand and describes concrete actions: slowing down, greeting the figure, a passenger entering the back seat. But it is extremely brief and garbled, and it gives no names, dates, or road. It therefore falls under the scoring guide’s cap of 40 for a fragment too short to assess.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Firsthand telling of driving home and approaching the figures.
  • A specific sequence: slow down, come alongside, greet, and the figure fades.
  • A second figure with a described sequence: stopping, entering the back seat, fading.
Against
  • No names, town, highway, date, or time of day is given for either figure.
  • Several lines are garbled or carry uncertain speaker labels, such as [quote withheld]
  • The caller does not consider or rule out any ordinary explanation.
Uncertain or missing
  • Whether this part of the story belongs to the caller or the host, given the host labels on caller-sounding content.
  • Whether the two figures are one recurring experience or two separate ones.
Passages cited
  • -1:-1:-1
  • 0:12
  • 0:24

What the model inferred (not said on air): I read the first-person “driving home” story as the caller’s, despite the automatic labels showing the host. I applied the short-fragment cap because the story runs under a minute and is partly unintelligible.

Evidence strength
Support in the story that others could check
8

Nothing beyond the caller’s word is present: no checkable names, dates, locations, or documents, and no second witness on air.

Evidence for and against
For
  • The caller’s own reported experience of slowing down and greeting the runner.
  • The caller’s own reported experience of the woman entering the car and fading.
Against
  • No physical evidence, photograph, recording, or document is claimed or examined.
  • No other witness speaks on air about these events.
  • No place or time detail that could be checked is given.
Uncertain or missing
  • The garbled “San Diego” line cannot be used as a checkable detail.
  • Speaker labels are unreliable, so even who made the claim is uncertain.
Passages cited
  • 0:06

What the model inferred (not said on air): Scored at the bottom of the scoring guide (the caller’s word only), with nothing that could be checked independently.

Creepiness
How unsettling the story is, for entertainment
38

A roadside figure that dissolves when addressed, and a woman who silently sits in the back seat before fading, are mildly to moderately unsettling. But there is no threat, harm, escalation, or ominous ending.

Evidence for and against
For
  • A figure that fades away when you greet it.
  • A stranger entering the back seat of the caller’s car and then vanishing.
  • The host’s added note that hitchhikers tell drivers of coming Armageddon before disappearing.
Against
  • The caller presents the experiences as routine and not threatening.
  • No reported physical contact, injury, menace, or lasting dread.
Uncertain or missing
  • The very short telling leaves little atmosphere to judge.
Passages cited
  • 0:28

What the model inferred (not said on air): The unsettling part is the intrusion into the car’s back seat. The Armageddon detail comes from the host, not the caller, and is weighted lightly.

Originality
How different it is from familiar recurring details
52

The vanishing-hitchhiker story is a stock legend. But the pairing of a runner who fades when greeted with a woman who fades after sitting in the back seat, both described as recurring, adds a distinctive twist.

Evidence for and against
For
  • Two recurring roadside figures rather than the single classic hitchhiker.
  • The runner disappears when greeted.
  • The woman vanishes from inside the vehicle rather than at the roadside.
Against
  • The core idea is the well-known vanishing hitchhiker, which the host names as a common local story.
  • No message, destination, or identifying detail sets the story apart.
Uncertain or missing
  • The originality score compared with the rest of the archive is provisional. This is a short excerpt from the pilot archive.
Passages cited
  • 0:06
  • 0:18

What the model inferred (not said on air): The automatic score sits near the middle (a familiar story plus one distinctive detail) rather than high, because the underlying legend is common.

Scoring confidence 0.35 · analysis confidence 0.40 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story, told in a live call; No physical evidence, documents, or recordings claimed; No second witness speaking on air. The originality score blends the model's score (48) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.

Ordinary explanations to consider

These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.

  • A brief misperception of a roadside object or person while driving, later recalled as an encounter. · The caller describes these sightings from a moving car ([quote withheld] [quote withheld]). Figures glimpsed at speed are easily misjudged.
  • The memory may be shaped by a widely told roadside legend, which the host immediately names for the region. · The host says [quote withheld] and that Oregon is [quote withheld] This points to a local story pattern that already existed.

What stands out

The vanishing hitchhiker is a familiar legend. Here the vanishing figure is split into two recurring roadside characters: a male runner who fades when spoken to and a woman who fades after entering the back seat. No message, destination, or death is attached to either. The caller gives no town, road name, or explanation, so the story is a bare claim that this happened again and again.

Related stories

Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.