Papers swirl after a caller mocks a house ghost named [name withheld]
[name withheld], calling from Pennsylvania, says that in 1996 in Dubuque, Iowa, they mocked coworkers’ talk of a ghost named [name withheld]. Later, alone during election work, they say, a stack of papers rose and swirled around them until they said they believed. The papers then stopped. The host notes that [name withheld] is about the fourth caller that morning whose experience followed mocking.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2004.mp3”, starting at 2:02:04). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
[name withheld], who gives their location as Pennsylvania, says the event happened in 1996, when they went to Dubuque, Iowa, with friends to work on the presidential election. Over several days, [name withheld] says, they heard people talking about [quote withheld] [name withheld] says they figured out that [name withheld] was a ghost said to live in one of the people’s homes, follow them around, ride in the car, and sometimes be visible. [name withheld] says they had been raised a very fundamental Christian and did not believe such things were possible, so they mocked the people [quote withheld] One night, [name withheld] says, the others went out for pizza while [name withheld] watched a news station. A stack of papers near the entertainment center [quote withheld] and began flying, swirling, and going. [name withheld] says they first thought it was a joke or “Candid Camera,” and told the unseen pranksters to stop playing around. The papers then began flying at the caller and swirling around them [quote withheld] [name withheld] says they batted the papers down and were terrified. [name withheld] recalls saying clearly, [quote withheld] and says that as soon as it was said the papers stopped. [name withheld] says they were breathing hard and horrified. Art Bell remarks that [name withheld] is about the fourth caller that morning whose experience came from mocking the whole thing.
Reported events, in order
- 0:06
[name withheld] says they are in Pennsylvania and that the story happened to them in 1996.
- 0:17
The caller says they went to Dubuque, Iowa, with friends to work on the 1996 presidential election.
- 0:25
The caller says they heard people talking about a guy named [name withheld] and learned [name withheld] was a ghost said to live in one of the people’s homes.
- 0:39
The caller says [name withheld] was said to follow them, ride in the car, and be sometimes visible and sometimes not.
- 1:01
The caller says they were raised a fundamental Christian, did not believe such things, and mocked the people arrogantly.
- 1:25
One night, while the others went for pizza and the caller watched news, a stack of papers near the entertainment center raised up and began flying and swirling.
- 1:56
The caller first thought it was a joke or Candid Camera. Then the papers began flying at the caller and swirling around them like a tornado. The caller batted the papers down and was terrified.
- 2:03
The caller says they addressed [name withheld], saying they believed, and the papers stopped immediately.
- 2:18
The host remarks that [name withheld] is about the fourth caller that morning whose experience came from mocking the whole thing.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- hearsay· 0:30
People in Dubuque reportedly described [name withheld] as a ghost who lived in one of their homes.
- hearsay· 0:39
They reportedly said [name withheld] followed them around and rode in the car, and sometimes they could see him and sometimes not.
- observation· 1:25
[name withheld] says a stack of papers near the entertainment center raised up on the side and began flying and swirling.
- observation· 1:56
The caller says the papers then flew at them and swirled around them in a tornado-like effect while the caller batted them down.
- interpretation· 2:03
The caller says they addressed [name withheld] and said they believed.
- observation· 2:12
The caller says the papers stopped as soon as the caller said they believed.
- host statement· 2:18
The host says [name withheld] is about the fourth caller that morning whose experience came from mocking the whole thing.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
This is a firsthand, fairly specific story with a stated year, places, and sequence, and it is consistent within itself. However, easy ordinary possibilities such as a draft or prank are not addressed, and no one but the caller backs it up.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand telling of a single event.
- Names a location and year: Pennsylvania, Dubuque, Iowa, 1996.
- Describes a sequence: papers lift, swirl, fly at the caller, and stop after the caller speaks.
- No other witness to the paper event speaks on air.
- A fan, draft, or staged prank is not ruled out.
- The other people and the exact room are not identified.
- The automatic transcript may contain errors.
- Room layout, paper type, and ventilation are unknown.
- 0:06
- 1:25
- 2:03
- 2:12
What the model inferred (not said on air): I place this in the clear-but-uncorroborated range because the story is specific and in order, while obvious ordinary explanations remain available and untested.
Only the caller’s word is present. The caller gives a year and places but no names for the other people, no documentation, and no second witness speaking on air.
Evidence for and against
- A year and cities are mentioned that sound checkable.
- The caller gives a fairly detailed sequence of events.
- No physical evidence, recording, or document is described.
- The other witnesses are unnamed and do not speak.
- The alleged ghost is not independently identified.
- The people and home involved are not identified.
- The paper movement was not preserved or examined.
- 0:25
- 1:25
What the model inferred (not said on air): Despite the place and year, this remains the caller’s word alone with no checkable independent support, so I score it at the bottom of the evidence range.
The story escalates suddenly from swirling papers to papers flying at the caller, and the caller says they were terrified and horrified. It is brief and partly framed as a possible joke, which reduces sustained dread.
Evidence for and against
- Papers reportedly fly at the caller and swirl around them.
- The caller says they were terrified and horrified.
- The movement reportedly stops only after the caller addresses [name withheld] and says they believe.
- The strange event involves paper, not physical harm.
- The caller first thinks it is Candid Camera or a joke.
- The host responds with a fairly light comment.
- The transcript does not describe how violent or sustained the paper movement was.
- 1:50
- 1:56
- 2:12
What the model inferred (not said on air): I rate it as genuinely unsettling but not frightening for long, because the threat is limited to paper and the story includes a comic frame.
This uses a familiar poltergeist or object-movement setup with a skeptic who mocks. The specific verbal surrender to “[name withheld]” and the paper tornado are distinctive details, but the overall pattern is common.
Evidence for and against
- A named ghost, [name withheld].
- Papers reportedly swirl like a tornado and stop when the caller says they believe.
- The host notes this is about the fourth call that morning involving mocking.
- Object movement after mocking is a stock ghost-story pattern.
- No especially unusual setting or event beyond the paper movement.
- How new the story is compared with the rest of the archive cannot be fully judged from one transcript.
- 0:30
- 1:56
- 2:03
- 2:18
What the model inferred (not said on air): I score it just above the stock level because the named ghost and the exact point at which the papers stop give it a memorable shape, while the core motif remains familiar.
Scoring confidence 0.82 · analysis confidence 0.85 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story.; No physical evidence or recording described.; Other witnesses mentioned but unnamed and not on air.. The originality score blends the model's score (52) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- A draft, fan, or air current near the entertainment center could lift and swirl lightweight papers. · The papers were in a stack near the entertainment center, and [name withheld] describes them raising [quote withheld] before swirling.
- A staged prank using a hidden fan, string, or helper could account for the movement and its stopping. · [name withheld] first thought it was a joke or “Candid Camera,” and the friends had just left for pizza.
What stands out
The story’s distinctive turn is the move from mockery to belief. The papers reportedly speed up after [name withheld] challenges the pranksters and stop when [name withheld] addresses [name withheld] by name and declares belief. The host’s remark that this is the fourth such call about mocking that morning also frames it as part of a pattern on the broadcast.
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.