Newspaper carrier reports a translucent man pumping water that never overflows
A caller identified on air as [name withheld] from Iowa says that as a teenager delivering the Des Moines Register at about 3:30 a.m., they saw a translucent old man at an outdoor water pump beside a new subdivision. The man wore a wide-brimmed hat, flannel shirt, baggy pants, and boots. The caller says they froze for about ten seconds, then spoke with the figure for 15 to 20 minutes until they ran out of things to say. The host then comments that freezing was probably the wiser reaction, and the story ends.
This clip comes from the source recording. AI chose where it starts and ends, so it may start or end a little early or late. The word-for-word transcript is not published. You can hear the source recording on the Internet Archive (file “Ghost to Ghost 2006.mp3”, starting at 2:15:27). Is this you, or someone you know? Ask for a correction or removal.
The story as told
The caller, introduced by the host as [quote withheld] says they had [quote withheld] The caller describes a new addition to the town, [quote withheld] The caller says they delivered papers [quote withheld]
On the route they say they rode their bicycle to the southeast house. Because they never cut across lawns, they went up the gravel driveway, turned right, walked the front sidewalk, went up three steps, and put the paper in the screen door. They say they turned, came back down the three steps, and turned right onto the sidewalk. Then they looked up and saw [quote withheld] and boots. They say the man [quote withheld]
They say they disagreed with the fight-or-flight idea and proposed a third response, “frozen.” The caller says they stood frozen about ten seconds. They say what went through their mind was that they had walked over that same spot 15 seconds earlier. They say they decided to talk to the figure, apologized for having walked over where the man was, and asked his name. They report the man was [quote withheld] with a bucket on the spout, [quote withheld] The caller says they spoke for “about 15-20 minutes” until they ran out of things to say. They then digress to watching “creature feature” weekend nights with their younger brother and the convention that the monster catches you from behind if you run. The host replies that freezing and talking were the wiser moves.
Reported events, in order
- 0:35
As a teenager, the caller says they delivered the Des Moines Register at about 3:30 a.m. before school in pitch darkness.
- 0:26
They describe a new addition of houses about five years old southeast of town.
- 0:54
They say they rode their bicycle to the southeast house and walked up the gravel driveway, the front sidewalk, and three steps to leave the paper in the screen door.
- 1:21
They say they turned back, came down the steps, and, looking up, saw an old man in a wide-brimmed hat, flannel shirt, baggy pants, and boots.
- 1:30
They say the man had no color and that they could see right through him.
- 1:52
They say they froze for about ten seconds, thinking they had walked over that exact spot 15 seconds earlier.
- 3:08
They say they spoke to the man, apologized, and asked his name.
- 2:59
They report the man was pumping water from an outside water pump, filling a bucket that never overflowed.
- 3:16
They say they talked for 15 to 20 minutes until they ran out of things to say.
- 3:30
They digress about watching creature features with their younger brother and the convention that the monster catches you from behind if you run.
Claims
Each claim is labeled as something the person telling the story noticed (observation), what they made of it (interpretation), something others told them (hearsay), or something the host said (host statement).
- observation· -3:-16:-26
The caller says they saw an old man in a wide-brimmed hat, flannel shirt, baggy pants, and boots standing where they had just walked.
- observation· -3:-16:-26
The caller says the figure had no color and that they could see through him.
- observation· -3:-16:-26
The caller reports the figure was pumping water into a bucket that never overflowed.
- observation· -3:-16:-26
The caller says they stood frozen for about ten seconds as a third reaction beyond fight or flight.
- observation· -3:-16:-26
The caller says they spoke with the figure for 15 to 20 minutes and then ran out of things to say.
- host statement· -3:-16:-26
The host states that freezing, and getting into the conversation, was the wiser of the moves made.
Scores, with reasons
An AI model gave these scores using a fixed set of scoring rules (scoring-v1). They are editorial judgments and rough guides, not the odds that anything paranormal happened. How scoring works.
A firsthand story with a clear sequence, a concrete physical description, and a specific time. But no one else backs it up, the identity of the figure is unconfirmed, and early-morning darkness and tiredness are plausible contributors.
Evidence for and against
- Firsthand witness: the caller describes their own experience.
- Concrete details: 3.30 a.m. delivery, gravel driveway, three steps, screen door.
- Coherent sequence from approach to encounter to conversation.
- The caller separates what they perceived ([quote withheld]) from anything they concluded.
- No second witness speaks on air.
- No name, date, or checkable location is given for the event.
- The [quote withheld] claim is not verified.
- Early-morning darkness and the pre-school hour suit a mistaken perception.
- The labels showing who is speaking switch between the host and the caller, so who said some lines is unclear.
- The automatic transcript marks later lines as low confidence.
- 0:35
- 1:30
- 2:59
What the model inferred (not said on air): The component points are my judgment based on how specific and coherent the transcript is, not on statements made by the caller.
The story rests entirely on the caller’s own word. No documentation, photograph, or second witness on air is presented.
Evidence for and against
- The caller gives a clear personal story.
- No physical evidence is claimed to exist.
- No other witness speaks on air.
- No names, dates, or records that could be checked are given.
- Whether the host or caller ever followed up off air is not in this part of the broadcast.
- 0:10
What the model inferred (not said on air): The score follows the scoring guide’s band for the caller’s word only. No independent support is present in this part of the broadcast.
A translucent figure seen alone in darkness at 3:30 a.m. is mildly eerie. But the encounter is not threatening, it turns into an ordinary conversation, and it ends with a light digression about creature features.
Evidence for and against
- A lone encounter in pitch darkness at 3.30 in the morning.
- The figure is described as having no color and being see-through.
- The figure is not reported as threatening or hostile.
- The caller speaks with the figure for 15 to 20 minutes.
- The story ends with humor about monsters and the host’s reassuring comments.
- There is no description of the figure’s manner beyond his actions at the pump.
- 1:30
- 2:28
What the model inferred (not said on air): The creepiness rating reflects the story’s atmosphere for a listener, not any claim about reality.
The translucent figure in a hat is a familiar motif. But the specific detail of a man pumping water into a bucket that never overflows, and a long ordinary conversation with the figure, is distinctive.
Evidence for and against
- A translucent old man in a wide-brimmed hat is a familiar ghost-story figure.
- The bucket that never overflows and the long conversation are unusual specifics.
- The setting (a paper route at night) and the see-through figure are stock elements.
- The published originality score would be calculated against the wider archive. This part of the broadcast alone supports only a provisional figure.
- 2:59
- 1:58
What the model inferred (not said on air): This is my estimate from the content. The comparison with the rest of the archive cannot be calculated from a single story.
Scoring confidence 0.60 · analysis confidence 0.65 · checked against outside sources: no · evidence available: The caller’s firsthand story only; No physical evidence presented or examined; No second witness on air. The originality score blends the model's score (55) with how rare the story's details are across the archive. This method is still provisional.
Ordinary explanations to consider
These are possibilities only. None is a finding about what happened.
- A living person was standing at an outdoor pump in the early morning, and the caller, delivering papers at 3:30 a.m., misread or misremembered details of the man’s appearance. · The caller says they were out at 3.30 in the morning when it was always pitch black.
- Tiredness and darkness at an early-morning hour led to a misperception, or to an experience like those that happen while falling asleep or waking up. · The story takes place before school at about 3:30 a.m., and the caller describes standing frozen for about ten seconds.
- The [quote withheld] could be a mistake in observing an ordinary pump and bucket. · The caller reports water being pumped into a bucket on the spout that never overflowed.
What stands out
The reported encounter is not threatening and becomes a long, ordinary conversation. It includes a specific physical claim: a pump filling a bucket that never overflows. The caller also reframes the usual fight-or-flight response by naming a third reaction, “frozen.”
Related stories
Matched by shared recurring details, categories, and wording.